Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3101 - 3119 of 3119
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/66/D/776/2016 Communication number s : 776/2016 Author: X and Y represented by counsel Marcel Zirngast Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Switzerland Submission date 19 Oct 2016 Date of decision 23 Apr JUTBCAT/C/66/D/776/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2581/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/900/2018 Communication number s : 900/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Dec 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/900/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3362/en-US
X v. Switzerland
X v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/775/2016 Communication number s : 775/2016 Author: X represented by counsel Roman Schuler Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Aug 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/67/D/775/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2625/en-US
Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan
Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/118/D/2205/2012 Communication number s : 2205/2012 Author: Yashar Agazade and Rasul Jafarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 02 Nov 2012 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2205/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2235/en-US
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea
Yoon and Choi v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/88/D/1321 1322/2004 Communication number s : 1322/2004 1321/2004 Author: Yeo Bum Yoon and Myung Jin Choi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 18 Oct 2004 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1321-1322/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1323/en-US
Young v. Australia
Young v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/941/2000 Communication number s : 941/2000 Author: Edward Young Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 29 Jun 1999 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Committee members Ruth JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/941/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1076/en-US
Z.W. v. Australia
Z.W. v. Australia CAT/C/62/D/669/2015 Communication number s : 669/2015 Author: Z.W. represented by counsel Frances Milne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Australia Submission date 20 Mar 2015 Date of decision 28 Nov 2017 JUTBCAT/C/62/D/669/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2413/en-US
Zündel v. Canada
Z ndel v. Canada CCPR/C/78/D/953/2000 Communication number s : 953/2000 Author: Ernst Z ndel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Canada Submission date 21 Aug 2000 Date of decision 27 Jul 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/953/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/955/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CAT/C/53/D/511/2012 Communication number s : 511/2012 Author: Z. represented by Norman Gibson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 53 Country Australia Submission date 29 Sep 2011 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/511/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2057/en-US
Z v. Denmark v. Denmark
Z v. Denmark v. Denmark CCPR/C/116/D/2422/2014 Communication number s : 2422/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Denmark Submission date 10 Jun 2014 Date of decision 11 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2422/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2096/en-US
Z. v. Sweden
Z. v. Sweden CAT/C/54/D/556/2013 Communication number s : 556/2013 Author: Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 54 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Jul 2013 Date of decision 08 May 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/54/D/556/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1987/en-US
Zhirnov v. Russian Federation
Zhirnov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/109/D/1795/2008 Communication number s : 1795/2008 Author: Oleg Anatolevich Zhirnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 109 Country Russian Federation Submission date 03 Sep 2004 Date of decision 28 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/109/D/1795/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1683/en-US
Ziablitsev v. France
Ziablitsev v. France E/C.12/71/D/176/2020 Communication number s : 176/2020 Author: Sergei Ziablitsev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country France Submission date 06 Jan 2020 Date of decision 02 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/71/D/176/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3000/en-US
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
v. Denmark,France,Paraguay,Switzerland
v. Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland CRC/C/92/2 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 83/2019 31/201774/2019 .30/2017 Author: Type of decision: Follow up report Session No 92 Country Denmark France Paraguay Switzerland Submission date Date JUTBCRC/C/92/2https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3755/en-US