Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 523
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 18 January 2002 in UNIV-11-chttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.M.A. v. Switzerland
A.M.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/45/D/344/2008 Communication number s : 344/2008 Author: A.M.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 45 Country Switzerland Submission date 22 May 2008 Date of decision 12 Nov 2010 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/45/D/344/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/63/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRALIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/AUS/CO/5 6 NULL 2019 11 01T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/AUS/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 1 November 2019 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/AUS/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/565aabfe-16c4-47bc-9476-e15faeda599d
Abramova v. Belarus
Abramova v. Belarus CEDAW/C/49/D/23/2009 Communication number s : 023/2009 Author: Inga Abramova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 49 Country Belarus Submission date 03 Apr 2009 Date of decision 25 Jul 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/49/D/23/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1703/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017 Communication number s : 3082/2017 Author: Ahmed Souaiene and A cha Souaiene Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Sep 2017 Date of decision 27 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2873/en-US
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland
Ali Fadel v. Switzerland CAT/C/53/D/450/2011 Communication number s : 450/2011 Author: Ali Fadel represented by counsel Tarig Hassan of Advokatur Kanonengasse Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Switzerland Submission date 03 Feb JUTBCAT/C/53/D/450/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2035/en-US
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan
Annadurdy Khadzhiyev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013 Communication number s : 2252/2013 Author: Annadurdy Khadzhiyev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 09 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2252/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2480/en-US
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan
Askarov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012 Communication number s : 2231/2012 Author: Azimjan Askarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Nov 2012 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2231/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2112/en-US
BELL v. Belgium
BELL v. Belgium BEL 06/04/2009 00:00:00 25/10/2016 12:18:05 Case Description: The Dumont group concerning the excessive length of judicial proceedings civil and criminal was closed 17 cases in December 2015 CM/ResDH 2015 245 . The examination of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-1201
Ben Salem v. Tunisia
Ben Salem v. Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/269/2005 Communication number s : 269/2005 Author: Ali Ben Salem Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 May 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/39/D/269/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/87/en-US
C.N. v. Burundi
C.N. v. Burundi CAT/C/60/D/579/2013 Communication number s : 579/2013 Author: G.N. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Burundi Submission date 11 Dec 2013 Date of decision 01 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/579/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3016/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA
CASE OF A AND B v. ROMANIA 48442/16 48831/16 DRAGOMIR D. E. ROU 6/2/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 3 a Abuse of the right of application No violation of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0602JUD004844216https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-202621
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A. v. THE NETHERLANDS 4900/06 SCH LLER P.J. FERSCHTMAN M. NLD 7/20/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 in case of expulsion to Libya No violation of Art. 13 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 444 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0720JUD000490006https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-100038
CASE OF ABDULKHAKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABDULKHAKOV v. RUSSIA 14743/11 RYABININA Y. TRENINA D. RUS 10/2/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Uzbekistan Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1002JUD001474311https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113287
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687