Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 5617
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 NULL 2019 12 06T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/BEL/CO/6 International Covenant on Distr.: General 6 December 2019 Civil and Political Rights English Original: French Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/BEL/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/943606ba-aac7-4b1e-9f9b-ec5c020ce60b
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BELGIUM: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/BEL/CO/5 NULL 2020 03 26T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/BEL/CO/5 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 26 March 2020 English Original: French Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights Concluding UHRIE/C.12/BEL/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1add8c47-dff7-4b9e-a1c7-d96f9d1e4110
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine
BELOUSOV v. Ukraine UKR 07/02/2014 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Details of this case together with status of execution can be found under the case of KAVERZIN http://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng i 004 31569 Status of Execution: Details of this EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32054
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine
BURMYCH AND OTHERS v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2017 00:00:00 19/10/2017 17:05:32 Case Description: These cases relate to the major structural problem of non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions concerning both pecuniary and non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47973
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal
Bahadur Maharjan v. Nepal CCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009 Communication number s : 1863/2009 Author: Dev Bahadur Maharjan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 105 Country Nepal Submission date 31 Dec 2008 Date of decision 19 Jul 2012 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1863/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1238/en-US
Barzhig v. France
Barzhig v. France CCPR/C/41/D/327/1988 Communication number s : 327/1988 Author: Herve Barzhig Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 41 Country France Submission date 09 Sep 1988 Date of decision 11 Apr 1991 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/41/D/327/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/547/en-US
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan
Boboev et.al. v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012 Communication number s : 2173/2012 Author: Dzhuraboy Boboev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Tajikistan Submission date 09 Jul 2012 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2173/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2311/en-US
Bujdosó v. Hungary
Bujdos v. Hungary CRPD/C/10/D/4/2011 Communication number s : 004/2011 Author: J nos Fiala Disability Rights Center Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 10 Country Hungary Submission date 14 Sep 2011 Date of decision 09 Sep 2013 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/10/D/4/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1988/en-US
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada
C.A.R.M. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/38/D/298/2006 Communication number s : 298/2006 Author: C.A.R.M. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 38 Country Canada Submission date 26 Jun 2006 Date of decision 18 May 2007 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/38/D/298/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/92/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. NORTH MACEDONIA 55798/16 55808/16 55817/16 55820/16 55823/16 GERICKE C. MKD 4/5/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0405JUD005579816https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-216861
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 34098/11 GUZMAN M. SWE 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Somalia 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003409811 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD003409811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145789
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A. AND OTHERS v. SWEDEN 14499/09 RIMSTEN E. SWE 6/28/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 Extradition Conditional Yemen No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition Conditional Yemen 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0628JUD001449909https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-111553
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN 68519/10 LINDBERG C. O. SWE 4/3/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Iraq 350 620 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910 FIFTH SECTION CASE OF A.A.M. v. SWEDEN Application ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0403JUD006851910https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142085
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA 49097/08 N/A RUS 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD004909708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108605
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF A.A. v. SWITZERLAND 58802/12 MOTZ S. HASSAN T. CHE 1/7/2014 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 3 Prohibition of torture Expulsion 350 620 444 110 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0107JUD005880212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-139903
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A.A. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 8000/08 THE AIRE CENTRE GBR 9/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Art. 8 in case of expulsion to Nigeria Sections 3 5 a and 5 of the Immigration Act 1971 Sections 82 1 82 2 j and k and 84 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0920JUD000800008https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-106282