Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7281 - 7300 of 7400
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/1999/68 7 April 1998 10 March 1999 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences Liechtenstein UNITED NATIONS E Distr. Economic and Social GENERAL Council E/CN.4/1999/68 10 March 1999 Original: ENGLISH UNSPE/CN.4/1999/68https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f1999%2f68&Lang=en
Special Rapporteur on violence against women, its causes and consequences
Report to HRC E/CN.4/2005/72/Add.2 from 2 February 2004 to 8 February 2004 20 December 2004 Special Rapporteur on violence against women its causes and consequences El Salvador UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. GENERAL Council UNSPE/CN.4/2005/72/Add.2https://spinternet.ohchr.org/Download.aspx?SymbolNo=E%2fCN.4%2f2005%2f72%2fAdd.2&Lang=en
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia
Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar v. Australia CAT/C/61/D/614/2014 Communication number s : 614/2014 Author: Subakaran R. Thirugnanasampanthar represented by counsel Robert James de Vere McCaw Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/614/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2254/en-US
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security (ETS No. 078A)
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security ETS No. 078A 078A Paris 1972 12 14T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 78 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 078Ahttps://rm.coe.int/1680074619
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
TAJIKISTAN: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/TJK/CO/3 NULL 2018 06 14T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/TJK/CO/3 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 18 June 2018 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment Committee UHRICAT/C/TJK/CO/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/b95b8546-f518-4d51-bbbc-773d902e4c7e
TEK GIDA IS SENDIKASI v. Turkey
TEK GIDA IS SENDIKASI v. Turkey TUR 04/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to form and join trade unions on account of the dismissal in 2004 of forty employees working in three factories of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47507
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
TODOROV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 13/10/2021 00:00:00 21/05/2022 19:35:01 Case Description: This case concerns a disproportionate interference in 2011 and 2012 with the right to peaceful enjoyment of their possessions of the applicants Todorov and Others EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60335
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria
TOMOV AND NIKOLOVA v. Bulgaria BGR 21/10/2016 00:00:00 17/11/2016 15:23:26 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and administrative EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-39501
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia
TOMOV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 09/07/2019 00:00:00 25/07/2019 15:06:12 Case Description: These cases concern a structural problem highlighted by the European Court applying the pilot judgment procedure of inhuman and degrading treatment caused by the poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52617
TONELLO v. Hungary
TONELLO v. Hungary HUN 24/04/2018 00:00:00 18/05/2018 11:04:24 Case Description: The Shaw group concerns violations of the applicants right to respect for their family life on account of the authorities failure to effectively address the issues arising EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49455
TUMELIAI v. Lithuania
TUMELIAI v. Lithuania LTU 09/04/2018 00:00:00 23/04/2018 17:08:01 Case Description: These cases concern decisions by the domestic courts ordering the applicants to demolish/alter constructions they had built on the basis of lawful construction permits EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49341
TURNALI v. Turkey
TURNALI v. Turkey TUR 06/11/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:08:36 Case Description: Protection of private and family life: dismissal of a daughter s request for paternity establishment as out of the statutory limitation period without allowing her to plead EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37318
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines
Tayag Vertido v. Philippines CEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008 Communication number s : 018/2008 Author: Karen Tayag Vertido Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Philippines Submission date 29 Nov 2007 Date of decision 16 Jul 2010 Comment: The JUTBCEDAW/C/46/D/18/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1700/en-US
Tcholatch v. Canada
Tcholatch v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002 Communication number s : 1052/2002 Author: Natalya Tcholatch Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 03 Feb 1998 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1052/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1339/en-US
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia
Tharchanamoorthy v. Australia CAT/C/72/D/944/2019 Communication number s : 944/2019 Author: Niroshanth Tharchanamoorthy Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Australia Submission date 23 May 2019 Date of decision 12 Nov 2021 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/944/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3341/en-US
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway
The Jewish community of Oslo et al. v. Norway CERD/C/67/D/30/2003 Communication number s : 030/2003 Author: The Jewish community of Oslo the Jewish community of Trondheim Rolf Kirchner Julius Paltiel the Norwegian Antiracist Centre and Nadeem Butt Type of JUTBCERD/C/67/D/30/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1740/en-US
The Special Rapporteur on the right to education- Mission to the Seychelles
The Special Rapporteur on the right to education Mission to the Seychelles A/HRC/26/27/ADD.1 NULL 2014 05 05T00:00:00 SR Education United Nations A/HRC/26/27/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 May 2014 Original: English Human Rights Council Twenty UHRIA/HRC/26/27/ADD.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/146547a1-8e1f-438c-890d-95188492b020
The prevention of ill-treatment of foreign nationals deprived of their liberty in the context of forced removals at borders
The prevention of ill treatment of foreign nationals deprived of their liberty in the context of forced removals at borders c cm 2023 03 30 CPT/Inf 2023 7 part The prevention of ill treatment of foreign nationals deprived of their liberty in the context CPTCPT/Inf(2023)07-parthttps://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-standards-inf-2023-7-part-en