Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 97
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. CHE 11/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1126JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-138948
CASE OF AL-DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF AL DULIMI AND MONTANA MANAGEMENT INC. v. SWITZERLAND 5809/08 MICHEL J. C. OBEIDAT T. FRIES S. CHE 6/21/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione personae Preliminary objection dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0621JUD000580908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164515
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF ARSLAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ARSLAN v. TURKEY 23462/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 10 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002346294https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58271
CASE OF BAŞKAYA AND OKÇUOGLU v. TURKEY
CASE OF BA KAYA AND OK UOGLU v. TURKEY 23536/94 24408/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 3 Lack of jurisdiction to examine complaint under Art. 14 No violation of Art. 7 first applicant Violation of Art. 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002353694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58276
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF CEYLAN v. TURKEY
CASE OF CEYLAN v. TURKEY 23556/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 10 Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses partial award Convention proceedings Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002355694https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58270
CASE OF EL-MASRI v. "THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA"
CASE OF EL MASRI v. THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA 39630/09 SKILBECK R. GOLDSTON J. PAVLI D. MKD 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD003963009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115621
CASE OF FATİH TAŞ v. TURKEY (No. 3)
CASE OF FAT H TA v. TURKEY No. 3 45281/08 AKMESE I. POLAT Y. TUR 4/24/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0424JUD004528108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182443
CASE OF FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF FATULLAYEV v. AZERBAIJAN 40984/07 ASHUROV I. AZE 4/22/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 6 2 Remainder inadmissible Pecuniary damage claim dismissed Non pecuniary damage award Articles 147.1 and 147.2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0422JUD004098407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-98401
CASE OF GÎRLEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF G RLEANU v. ROMANIA 50376/09 HATNEANU D. O. ROU 6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Articles 12 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD005037609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184064
CASE OF GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIA
CASE OF GENOV AND SARBINSKA v. BULGARIA 52358/15 EKIMDZHIEV M. BONCHEVA K. BGR 11/30/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:1130JUD005235815https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-213520
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF GERGER v. TURKEY
CASE OF GERGER v. TURKEY 24919/94 N/A TUR 7/8/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 Preliminary objections rejected non exhaustion of domestic remedies lack of jurisdiction Violation of Art. 6 1 independent and impartial tribunal Not necessary to examine ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0708JUD002491994https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58272
CASE OF GILLAN AND QUINTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF GILLAN AND QUINTON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 4158/05 FERGUSON C. GBR 1/12/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Sections 44 47 of the Terrorism Act 2000 Paragraph 3.5 of the Code of Practice 451 203 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0112JUD000415805https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-96585
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY 4871/16 KALECK W. DEU 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208279