Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 4121 - 4140 of 5009
JUSSY v. France
JUSSY v. France FRA 08/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:09:01 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings before industrial courts. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32335
Jaddoe v. Netherlands
Jaddoe v. Netherlands CCPR/C/135/D/3256/2018 Communication number s : 3256/2018 Author: Dewradj Jaddoe Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Netherlands Submission date 12 Jun 2017 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3256/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3644/en-US
Jaime Calderón Bruges v. Colombia
Jaime Calder n Bruges v. Colombia CCPR/C/104/D/1641/2007 Communication number s : 1641/2007 Author: Jaime Calder n Bruges Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Colombia Submission date 22 May 2007 Date of decision 23 Mar 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1641/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1623/en-US
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands
Jean Baptiste Mugimba v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/768/2016 Communication number s : 768/2016 Author: Jean Baptiste Mugimba represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2578/en-US
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands
Jean Claude Iyamuremye v. Netherlands CAT/C/66/D/771/2016 Communication number s : 771/2016 Author: Jean Claude Iyamuremye represented by counsels Bart Stapert Caroline Buisman and Devika Kamp Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country JUTBCAT/C/66/D/771/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2579/en-US
Jean Emmanuel Kandem Foumbi v. Cameroon
Jean Emmanuel Kandem Foumbi v. Cameroon CCPR/C/112/D/2325/2013 Communication number s : 2325/2013 Author: Jean Emmanuel Kandem Foumbi Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country Cameroon Submission date 18 Nov 2013 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2325/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1942/en-US
Joint First and Second Evaluation Rounds Evaluation Report on Kazakhstan
Joint First and Second Evaluation Rounds Evaluation Report on Kazakhstan KAZ 2022 03 25 2022 06 15 Adoption: 25 March 2022 Public Publication: 15 June 2022 GrecoEval 1/2Rep 2021 1 Joint First and Second Evaluation Rounds Evaluation Report on Kazakhstan GRECOGrecoEval1-2Rep-2021-1-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Kazakhstan-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval1-2Rep-2021-1-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Kazakhstan-PUBLIC
José Antonio Cañada Mora v. Spain
Jos Antonio Ca ada Mora v. Spain CCPR/C/112/D/2070/2011 Communication number s : 2070/2011 Author: Jos Antonio Ca ada Mora represented by counsel Jos Luis Maz n Costa Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country Spain Submission date JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2070/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1908/en-US
K.B. v. Russian Federation
K.B. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2193/2012 Communication number s : 2193/2012 Author: K.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 22 Aug 2012 Date of decision 10 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2193/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2100/en-US
K.J. v. Lithuania
K.J. v. Lithuania CCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015 Communication number s : 2674/2015 Author: K.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Lithuania Submission date 05 Feb 2015 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2674/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3296/en-US
K.J. v. Poland
K.J. v. Poland POL 01/06/2016 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: These cases concern violation of the applicants right to respect for family life on account of the authorities failure to facilitate reunion between the applicants and their EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20638
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium
K.K. and R.H. v. Belgium CRC/C/89/D/73/2019 Communication number s : 73/2019 Author: K.K. and R.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belgium Submission date 30 Jan 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/89/D/73/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2995/en-US
K.K. et al. v. Russian Federation
K.K. et al. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/127/D/2912/2016 Communication number s : 2912/2016 Author: K.K. and others Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Russian Federation Submission date 27 Oct 2016 Date of decision 05 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2912/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2808/en-US
K.K. v. Russian Federation
K.K. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/72/D/98/2016 Communication number s : 098/2015 Author: K.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/98/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2653/en-US
K.M. v. Belarus
K.M. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2199/2012 Communication number s : 2199/2012 Author: K.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 17 Sep 2012 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2199/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2383/en-US
K.S. v. Poland
K.S. v. Poland CEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018 Communication number s : 128/2018 Author: K.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 76 Country Poland Submission date 11 Apr 2017 Date of decision 06 Jul 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/76/D/128/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3034/en-US
KABAR v. Turkey
KABAR v. Turkey TUR 28/06/2022 00:00:00 03/07/2022 22:00:17 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of the breach of the principle of equality of arms in civil proceedings Article 6 1 . The Court noted that EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-60717
KAHRAMAN v. Turkey
KAHRAMAN v. Turkey TUR 31/01/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:16:29 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair trial due to the applicants lack of access to classified documents furthermore in some cases also due to the non EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37368
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia
KALASHNIKOV v. Russia RUS 15/10/2002 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service FSIN EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14068
KALKANOV v. Bulgaria
KALKANOV v. Bulgaria BGR 09/01/2009 00:00:00 04/11/2016 14:40:21 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair civil proceedings due to the refusal by the Supreme Court of Cassation to examine a decisive argument raised by the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14323