Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 22
CASE OF ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION “ROMUVA” v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ANCIENT BALTIC RELIGIOUS ASSOCIATION ROMUVA v. LITHUANIA 48329/19 VAL IUKAS E. LTU 6/8/2021 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 9 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0608JUD004832919https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210282
CASE OF BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. LITHUANIA 41288/15 WINTEMUTE R.W. RASKEVICIUS T.V. LTU 1/14/2020 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0114JUD004128815https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-200344
CASE OF CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. GREECE
CASE OF CANEA CATHOLIC CHURCH v. GREECE 25528/94 GRC 12/16/1997 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 14 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Not necessary to examine P1 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 Pecuniary damage financial award Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1997:1216JUD002552894https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58124
CASE OF CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF CARVALHO PINTO DE SOUSA MORAIS v. PORTUGAL 17484/15 PARENTE RIBEIRO V. PRT 7/25/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Non pecuniary ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0725JUD001748415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-175659
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM
CASE OF COEME AND OTHERS v. BELGIUM 32492/96 32547/96 32548/96 33209/96 33210/96 N/A BEL 6/22/2000 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 in respect of Mr Coeme fair hearing Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 and 6 3 Violation of Art. 6 1 tribunal established ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0622JUD003249296https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59194
CASE OF DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF DUDGEON v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 7525/76 N/A GBR 10/22/1981 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 8 Just satisfaction reserved Offences against the Person Act 1861 Criminal Law Amendment Act 1885 451 425 429 203 319 268 358 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1981:1022JUD000752576https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57473
CASE OF ŞERİFE YİĞİT v. TURKEY
CASE OF ER FE Y T v. TURKEY 3976/05 TANRIKULU M.S. KIRIK N. TUR 11/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed exhaustion of domestic remedies No violation of Art. 14 P1 1 No violation of Art. 8 Social Security Act Articles 134 and 143 of the Civil ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1102JUD000397605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-101579
CASE OF FÁBIÁN v. HUNGARY
CASE OF F BI N v. HUNGARY 78117/13 GR D A. HUN 9/5/2017 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 Protection of property Article 1 para. 1 of Protocol No. 1 Deprivation of property Peaceful enjoyment of possessions ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0905JUD007811713https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-176769
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
CASE OF HIRST v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 2 74025/01 ABRAHAMSON E. GBR 10/6/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of P1 3 No separate issue under Art. 14 No separate issue under Art. 10 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1006JUD007402501https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-70442
CASE OF HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF HOPPEN AND TRADE UNION OF AB AMBER GRID EMPLOYEES v. LITHUANIA 976/20 PA KEVI I T A. LTU 1/17/2023 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 11 1 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0117JUD000097620https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222320
CASE OF IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF IRELAND v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 5310/71 N/A GBR 1/18/1978 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 14 5 Just satisfaction not applied Civil authorities Special Powers Act Northern Ireland 96 95 285 489 276 293 430 343 100 350 89 90 192 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1978:0118JUD000531071https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57506
CASE OF KOKKINAKIS v. GREECE
CASE OF KOKKINAKIS v. GREECE 14307/88 N/A GRC 5/25/1993 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 No violation of Art. 7 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 9 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs and expenses award domestic ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:0525JUD001430788https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57827
CASE OF LUPENI GREEK CATHOLIC PARISH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF LUPENI GREEK CATHOLIC PARISH AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 76943/11 HATNEANU D.O. BORSANYI C.T. ROU 5/19/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Manifestly ill founded Ratione materiae No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0519JUD007694311https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-154984
CASE OF METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF METROPOLITAN CHURCH OF BESSARABIA AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 45701/99 N/A MDA 12/13/2001 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 9 Violation of Art. 13 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 1 and 11 Non pecuniary damage financial ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2001:1213JUD004570199https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-59985
CASE OF MIZZI v. MALTA
CASE OF MIZZI v. MALTA 26111/02 FARRUGIA Marse Ann lawyer St. Venera MLT 1/12/2006 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed estoppel Violation of Art. 6 1 Violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 14 6 1 and 14 8 Non pecuniary damage financial award Costs ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:0112JUD002611102https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71983
CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE
CASE OF S.A.S. v. FRANCE 43835/11 SHARMA S. RAMBY DE MELLO M. MUMAN T. SINGH JUSS S. FRA 7/1/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Actio popularis Preliminary objections dismissed ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0701JUD004383511https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-145466
CASE OF T.C. v. ITALY
CASE OF T.C. v. ITALY 54032/18 MARSELLA L. NARDI O. ITA 5/19/2022 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0519JUD005403218https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-217264
CASE OF THE MOSCOW BRANCH OF THE SALVATION ARMY v. RUSSIA
CASE OF THE MOSCOW BRANCH OF THE SALVATION ARMY v. RUSSIA 72881/01 RYAKHOVSKIY V. PCHELINTSEV A. RUS 10/5/2006 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 11 read in the light of Art. 9 Not necessary to examine under Art. 14 Non pecuniary damage financial award Federal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2006:1005JUD007288101https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-77249
CASE OF THLIMMENOS v. GREECE
CASE OF THLIMMENOS v. GREECE 34369/97 N/A GRC 4/6/2000 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Preliminary objection rejected estoppel Violation of Art. 14 9 Not necessary to examine Art. 9 Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary damage claim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2000:0406JUD003436997https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58561
CASE OF TINNELLY & SONS LTD AND OTHERS AND McELDUFF AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF TINNELLY SONS LTD AND OTHERS AND McELDUFF AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 20390/92 N/A GBR 7/10/1998 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 14 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 8 Not necessary to examine Art. 13 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1998:0710JUD002039092https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58195