Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1614
A.B. v. Finland
A.B. v. Finland CRC/C/86/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 051/2018 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Finland Submission date 27 Jun 2018 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/86/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2946/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
A.J. v. United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland CEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018 Communication number s : 126/2018 Author: A.J. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 74 Country United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland JUTBCEDAW/C/74/D/126/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2666/en-US
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon
Achille Benoit Zogo Andela v. Cameroon CCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016 Communication number s : 2764/2016 Author: Cyrille Gervais Moutono Zogo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Cameroon Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2764/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2360/en-US
Akhidenor et al. v. Canada
Akhidenor et al. v. Canada CAT/C/21/D/67/1997 Communication number s : 067/1997 Author: E.O. Akhidenor E. Ainabe R. Akhidenor J. Akhidenor K. Akhidenor and W. Akhidenor Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 21 Country Canada Submission JUTBCAT/C/21/D/67/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/241/en-US
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan
Ashim Rakishev and Dmitry Rakishev v. Kazakhstan CAT/C/61/D/661/2015 Communication number s : 661/2015 Author: Ashim Rakishev father and Dmitry Rakishev son represented by counsel Anara Ibraeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country JUTBCAT/C/61/D/661/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2276/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BAJIC v. Croatia
BAJIC v. Croatia HRV 13/02/2013 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:24:46 Case Description: Right to life: Lack of an adequate prompt and effective investigation into the applicants claims that their relatives death resulted from medical malpractice. Article 2 in its EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-10133
BARSOVA v. Russia
BARSOVA v. Russia RUS 22/10/2019 00:00:00 25/10/2019 16:33:48 Case Description: The applicant women in this group of cases were victims of different forms of domestic violence from their male partners/ex partners including repeated assaults abusive and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54105
BIANCHI v. Switzerland
BIANCHI v. Switzerland CHE 22/09/2006 00:00:00 27/10/2016 18:58:12 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure of authorities to take adequate measures in implementation of an order for the return of a father s son under the 1980 Hague Convention EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4726
BOCHAN v. Ukraine (No. 2)
BOCHAN v. Ukraine No. 2 UKR 05/02/2015 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Unfair civil and criminal review proceedings before the Supreme Court following initial judgments of the European Court Bochan No. 1 Yaremenko EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31248
Benítez Gamarra v. Paraguay
Ben tez Gamarra v. Paraguay CCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008 Communication number s : 1829/2008 Author: Ernesto Ben tez Gamarra Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Paraguay Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1829/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1222/en-US
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden
C. T. and K. M. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/279/2005 Communication number s : 279/2005 Author: C.T. and K.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 07 Sep 2005 Date of decision 17 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/37/D/279/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/102/en-US
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.A. v. RUSSIA 49097/08 N/A RUS 1/17/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0117JUD004909708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108605
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA
CASE OF A AND B v. CROATIA 7144/15 BOJIC I. VRANJICAN DEREK T. DRENSKI LASAN V. HRV 6/20/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Effective investigation Procedural aspect No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0620JUD000714415https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-194217
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A, B AND C v. LATVIA
CASE OF A B AND C v. LATVIA 30808/11 MOLA I. LVA 3/31/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0331JUD003080811https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161741