Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1641 - 1660 of 2190
Conclusions XXI-4 - Spain - Article 8-2
Conclusions XXI 4 Spain Article 8 2 ESP 08 02 000 05/12/2019 04/03/2020 Article 8 Right of employed women to protection Paragraph 2 Illegality of dismissal during maternity leave The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report ESCXXI-4/def/ESP/8/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXI-4/def/ESP/8/2/EN
Conclusions XXII-1 - Poland - Article 1-2
Conclusions XXII 1 Poland Article 1 2 POL 01 02 000 29/01/2021 02/02/2021 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of the information contained in the ESCXXII-1/def/POL/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-1/def/POL/1/2/EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Czernin v. Czech Republic
Czernin v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/83/D/823/1998 Communication number s : 823/1998 Author: Rudolf Czernin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Dec 1996 Date of decision 29 Mar 2005 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/823/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1163/en-US
D.C. v. Switzerland
D.C. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/889/2018 Communication number s : 889/2018 Author: D.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/73/D/889/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3334/en-US
D.J.D.G. et al v. Canada,Colombia
D.J.D.G. et al v. Canada Colombia CCPR/C/99/D/1872/2009 Communication number s : 1872/2009 Author: D.J.D.G. et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 99 Country Canada Colombia Submission date 08 Apr 2009 Date of decision 26 Jul 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/99/D/1872/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1102/en-US
D.N.S. v. Denmark
D.N.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/81/D/144/2019 Communication number s : 144/2019 Author: D.N.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 81 Country Denmark Submission date 24 Jun 2019 Date of decision 23 Feb 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/81/D/144/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3050/en-US
D.T.T. v. Colombia
D.T.T. v. Colombia CCPR/C/107/D/1904/2009 Communication number s : 1904/2009 Author: D.T.T. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Colombia Submission date 18 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1904/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1513/en-US
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic
D.V. and H.V. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008 Communication number s : 1848/2008 Author: D.V. and H.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Czech Republic Submission date 07 Sep 2006 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1848/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1343/en-US
DEBELIANOVI v. Bulgaria
DEBELIANOVI v. Bulgaria BGR 29/06/2007 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: Protection of property: Non enforcement of a court decision ordering the restitution of a house which had been classified as a national cultural monument on the ground EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3797
DIYA 97 v. Ukraine
DIYA 97 v. Ukraine UKR 21/01/2011 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfairness of commercial proceedings and infringement of the principle of legal certainty due to the Supreme Court s disregard EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31132
DRUZSTEVNI ZALOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic
DRUZSTEVNI ZALOZNA PRIA AND OTHERS v. the Czech Republic CZE 26/01/2009 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:27:14 Case Description: Protection of property and Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Placement of a credit union in receivership without EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6154
DYLUS v. Poland
DYLUS v. Poland POL 23/12/2021 00:00:00 20/01/2022 18:20:37 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the Supreme Court in 2013 to hear the cassation appeal lodged by the applicant a lawyer by profession in the disciplinary proceedings against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-59367
David v. Sweden
David v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/220/2002 Communication number s : 220/2002 Author: Ruben David Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Nov 2002 Date of decision 02 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/220/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/135/en-US
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark CERD/C/80/D/46/2009 Communication number s : 046/2009 Author: Mahali Dawas and Yousef Shava Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jun 2009 Date of decision 06 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/80/D/46/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1727/en-US
Decision on the merits: Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace v. Italy, Complaint No. 102/2013
Decision on the merits: Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace v. Italy Complaint No. 102/2013 ITA 91 162 163 91 159 163 2016 07 05 2016 11 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 5 July ESCcc-102-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-102-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, complaint No. 114/2015
Decision on the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France complaint No. 114/2015 FRA 17 01 163 17 02 163 07 10 000 11 01 000 13 01 000 31 02 163 30 00 163 91 00 163 2018 01 24 2018 06 15 ESCcc-114-2015-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-114-2015-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits:European Organisation of Military Associations and Trade Unions (EUROMIL) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 164/2018
Decision on the merits:European Organisation of Military Associations and Trade Unions EUROMIL v. Ireland Complaint No. 164/2018 IRL 01 02 000 26 02 163 2020 10 21 2021 03 18 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ESCcc-164-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-164-2018-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Federation of Catholic Family Associations in Europe (FAFCE) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 89/2013
Decision on the merits: Federation of Catholic Family Associations in Europe FAFCE v. Ireland Complaint No. 89/2013 IRL 07 10 000 17 01 163 2014 09 12 2015 02 18 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS ESCcc-89-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-89-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Fellesforbundet for Sjøfolk (FFFS) v. Norway, Collective Complaint No. 74/2011
Decision on the merits: Fellesforbundet for Sj folk FFFS v. Norway Collective Complaint No. 74/2011 NOR 01 02 000 24 00 163 91 102 163 91 201 163 02/07/2013 16/10/2013 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE ESCcc-74-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-74-2011-dmerits-en