Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 586
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A A. v. Azerbaijan
A A. v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/35/D/247/2004 Communication number s : 247/2004 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 28 Feb 2004 Date of decision 25 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/35/D/247/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/123/en-US
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
A.L. v. Spain
A.L. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/16/2017 Communication number s : 016/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 15 May 2017 Date of decision 31 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/81/D/16/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2526/en-US
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine
AFANASYEV v. Ukraine UKR 05/07/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases concern physical or psychological torture and/or ill treatment by the police mostly in order to obtain confessions substantive violations of Article 3 lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31348
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia
ANANYEV AND OTHERS v. Russia RUS 04/10/2012 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: This group of cases concerns in particular poor conditions of pre trial detention in the remand centres SIZO under the authority of the Federal Penitentiary Service EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14142
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alakuş v. Türkiye
Alaku v. T rkiye CCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020 Communication number s : 3736/2020 Author: Mukadder Alaku Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country T rkiye Submission date 23 Dec 2019 Date of decision 26 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3736/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3737/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985
Baban v. Australia
Baban v. Australia CCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001 Communication number s : 1014/2001 Author: Omar Sharif Baban Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Australia Submission date 19 Dec 2000 Date of decision 06 Aug 2003 Comment: Under rule 86 of JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/1014/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1057/en-US
Blanco Abad v. Spain
Blanco Abad v. Spain CAT/C/20/D/59/1996 Communication number s : 059/1996 Author: Encarnaci n Blanco Abad Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 20 Country Spain Submission date 12 Feb 1996 Date of decision 14 May 1998 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/20/D/59/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/246/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDI MAHAMUD v. MALTA 56796/13 CAMILLERI K. CAMILLERI M. MLT 5/3/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0503JUD005679613https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-162424
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA
CASE OF ABDULLAHI ELMI AND AWEYS ABUBAKAR v. MALTA 25794/13 28151/13 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 11/22/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect Violation of Article 5 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1122JUD002579413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168780
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ADEN AHMED v. MALTA
CASE OF ADEN AHMED v. MALTA 55352/12 CAMILLERI M. CAMILLERI K. MLT 7/23/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 4 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0723JUD005535212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-122894
CASE OF AHMET ÖZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY
CASE OF AHMET ZKAN AND OTHERS v. TURKEY 21689/93 N/A TUR 4/6/2004 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect Violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Life Substantive aspect No violation of Article 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0406JUD002168993https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61696
CASE OF AKIMENKOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF AKIMENKOV v. RUSSIA 2613/13 50041/14 AGRANOVSKIY D.V. RUS 2/6/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0206JUD000261313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180554
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044