Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 19 of 19
A.H.G. v. Canada
A.H.G. v. Canada CCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011 Communication number s : 2091/2011 Author: A.H.G. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Canada Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 25 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2091/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1926/en-US
A.K. et al. v. Australia
A.K. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014 Communication number s : 2365/2014 Author: A.K. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Australia Submission date 13 Mar 2014 Date of decision 08 Jul 2021 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2365/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3109/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi
B.N. and S.R. v. Burundi CAT/C/71/D/858/2018 Communication number s : 858/2018 Author: B.N. and S.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Burundi Submission date 22 Dec 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/858/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3375/en-US
Bellini v. Italy
Bellini v. Italy CRPD/C/27/D/51/2018 Communication number s : 51/2018 Author: Maria Simona Bellini Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Italy Submission date 28 Mar 2017 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/51/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3604/en-US
Brough v. Australia
Brough v. Australia CCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003 Communication number s : 1184/2003 Author: Corey Brough Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 86 Country Australia Submission date 04 Mar 2003 Date of decision 17 Mar 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/86/D/1184/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1241/en-US
D.G. et al. v. Philippines
D.G. et al. v. Philippines CCPR/C/128/D/2568/2015 Communication number s : 2568/2015 Author: D.G. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Philippines Submission date 25 Mar 2013 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2568/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2841/en-US
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
Estela Deolinda Yrusta and Alejandra del Valle Yrusta v. Argentina
Estela Deolinda Yrusta and Alejandra del Valle Yrusta v. Argentina CAT/C/65/D/778/2016 Communication number s : 778/2016 Author: Estela Deolinda Yrusta and Alejandra del Valle Yrusta represented by the Provincial Public Defender of Santa Fe Gabriel Ganon JUTBCAT/C/65/D/778/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2593/en-US
Eugénie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eug nie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016 Communication number s : 2835/2016 Author: Eug nie Chakupewa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3232/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
M.T. v. Uzbekistan
M.T. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013 Communication number s : 2234/2013 Author: M.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Dec 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2234/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2015/en-US
Madafferi v. Australia
Madafferi v. Australia CCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001 Communication number s : 1011/2001 Author: Francesco Madafferi and Anna Maria Immacolata Madafferi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Australia Submission date 16 Jul 2001 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1011/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1123/en-US
Midiam Iricelda Valdez Cantú et al. v. Mexico
Midiam Iricelda Valdez Cant et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/127/D/2766/2016 Communication number s : 2766/2016 Author: Midiam Iricelda Valdez Cant and Mar a Hortencia Rivas Rodr guez on their own behalf and on behalf of V ctor Manuel Guajardo Rivas their missing JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2766/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2803/en-US
Neupane et.al. v. Nepal
Neupane et.al. v. Nepal CCPR/C/120/D/2170/2012 Communication number s : 2170/2012 Author: Shanta Neupane and Nisha Neupane Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Nepal Submission date 14 Dec 2012 Date of decision 21 Jul 2017 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2170/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2309/en-US
Padilla et al. v. Mexico
Padilla et al. v. Mexico CCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016 Communication number s : 2750/2016 Author: Mar a Eugenia Padilla Garc a Ricardo Ulises T llez Padilla and Mar a Eugenia Zald var Padilla on their own behalf and on behalf of Christian T llez Padilla their JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2750/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2780/en-US
Szijjarto v. Hungary
Szijjarto v. Hungary CEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004 Communication number s : 004/2004 Author: Andrea Szijjarto Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Hungary Submission date 12 Feb 2004 Date of decision 14 Aug 2006 Comment: Under rule 60 1 c of JUTBCEDAW/C/36/D/4/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1716/en-US
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women's Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak, Gülen Khan, and Melissa Özdemir (descendants of the deceased) v. Austria
The Vienna Intervention Centre against Domestic Violence and the Association for Women s Access to Justice on behalf of Banu Akbak G len Khan and Melissa zdemir descendants of the deceased v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005 Communication number s : 006/2005 JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/6/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1711/en-US
Z.B. v. Hungary
Z.B. v. Hungary CCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016 Communication number s : 2768/2016 Author: Z.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 123 Country Hungary Submission date 23 May 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2768/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2538/en-US