Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1185
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A.B. v. Spain
A.B. v. Spain CRC/C/83/D/24/2017 Communication number s : 024/2017 Author: A.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 12 Jul 2017 Date of decision 07 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/83/D/24/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2634/en-US
A.L. v. Spain
A.L. v. Spain CRC/C/81/D/16/2017 Communication number s : 016/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Spain Submission date 15 May 2017 Date of decision 31 May 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCRC/C/81/D/16/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2526/en-US
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine
AGROKOMPLEKS v. Ukraine UKR 08/03/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Unfair insolvency proceedings against an oil refinery in which the State was a major shareholder due to the lack of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31565
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine
AGROTEHSERVIS v. Ukraine UKR 30/11/2005 00:00:00 07/11/2016 14:16:38 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice and protection of property: Breach of the principle of legal certainty as well as of right to property on account of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26152
AKVARDAR v. Turkey
AKVARDAR v. Turkey TUR 24/02/2020 00:00:00 20/03/2020 16:31:03 Case Description: Protection of property rights: Disproportionate interference due to the applicant s inability to obtain the compensation due for expropriation of land which had belonged to EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54933
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey
AKYOL AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 26/05/2020 00:00:00 26/05/2020 16:45:54 Case Description: Freedom of expression: Unjustified interference on account of disciplinary punishments eleven days of solitary confinement imposed under the Regulations on the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55167
ALVANOS AND OTHERS v. Greece
ALVANOS AND OTHERS v. Greece GRC 20/06/2008 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:42:24 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to the Supreme Court due to the latter s formalistic approach regarding the admissibly grounds of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22899
ANTUNES AND PIRES v. Portugal
ANTUNES AND PIRES v. Portugal PRT 21/09/2007 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Failure to communicate to the applicants several documents presented by the public prosecutor and/or the memoranda EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9917
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain
ARROZPIDE SARASOLA AND OTHERS v. Spain ESP 23/01/2019 00:00:00 06/02/2019 16:53:15 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the Supreme Court s dismissal of the applicants amparo appeals concerning the calculation of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51361
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia
ARSHINCHIKOVA v. Russia RUS 29/06/2007 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:03:34 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Breach of the principle of legal certainty through quashing of a binding and enforceable judgment by the Supreme EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-27544
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova MDA 08/02/2006 00:00:00 02/11/2016 11:48:46 Case Description: Breach right to a fair hearing and the principle of legal certainty and interference with the right to peaceful enjoyment of possessions: Quashing of two final EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7510
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova (no. 2)
ASITO v. the Republic of Moldova no. 2 MDA 13/06/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 10:38:31 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice and protection of property: Denial of the applicant company s right to a fair hearing and infringement of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-6868
Aboufaied v. Libya
Aboufaied v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008 Communication number s : 1782/2008 Author: Tahar Mohamed Aboufaied Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 05 Apr 2008 Date of decision 21 Mar 2012 Comment: The texts of JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1782/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1364/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Spain
Ali Aarrass v. Spain CCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010 Communication number s : 2008/2010 Author: Ali Aarrass Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Spain Submission date 25 Nov 2010 Date of decision 21 Jul 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2008/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1860/en-US
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan
Allakulov v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014 Communication number s : 2430/2014 Author: Khidirnazar Allakulov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 120 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 09 Sep 2011 Date of decision 19 Jul 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/120/D/2430/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2318/en-US
Alzery v. Sweden
Alzery v. Sweden CCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005 Communication number s : 1416/2005 Author: Mohammed Alzery Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 88 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Jul 2005 Date of decision 25 Oct 2006 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1416/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1300/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US