Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 7521 - 7540 of 7582
X and Y v. Georgia
X and Y v. Georgia CEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009 Communication number s : 024/2009 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Georgia Submission date 24 Jun 2009 Date of decision 13 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/61/D/24/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2051/en-US
X and Y v. Switzerland
X and Y v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/807/2017 Communication number s : 807/2017 Author: X and Y Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 27 Sep 2016 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/807/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3372/en-US
X. v. Austria
X. v. Austria CEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014 Communication number s : 067/2014 Author: X. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Austria Submission date 15 Nov 2013 Date of decision 11 Jul 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/64/D/67/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2108/en-US
X v. Colombia
X v. Colombia CCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005 Communication number s : 1361/2005 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Colombia Submission date 13 Jan 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2007 Comment: An individual opinion co signed by JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1361/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1338/en-US
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic
X. v. Czech Republic v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010 Communication number s : 1961/2010 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 04 Jan 2010 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1961/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1952/en-US
X. v. Denmark
X. v. Denmark CCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010 Communication number s : 2007/2010 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Nov 2010 Date of decision 26 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/2007/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1816/en-US
X v. Denmark
X v. Denmark CCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014 Communication number s : 2389/2014 Author: Helle Holm Thomsen Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Denmark Submission date 12 May 2014 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2389/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2061/en-US
X v. Latvia
X v. Latvia CCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018 Communication number s : 3254/2018 Author: X Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Latvia Submission date 02 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3254/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3494/en-US
X v. Norway
X v. Norway CCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014 Communication number s : 2474/2014 Author: X Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Norway Submission date 28 Oct 2014 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2474/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2018/en-US
X. v. Republic of Korea
X. v. Republic of Korea CCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009 Communication number s : 1908/2009 Author: X. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Republic of Korea Submission date 19 Oct 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1908/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1809/en-US
X. v. Switzerland
X. v. Switzerland CAT/C/63/D/704/2015 Communication number s : 704/2015 Author: X. represented by counsel Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 63 Country Switzerland Submission date 24 Sep 2015 Date of decision 17 May 2018 Comment: Decision JUTBCAT/C/63/D/704/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2742/en-US
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland
XERO FLOR W POLSCE SP. Z O.O. v. Poland POL 07/08/2021 00:00:00 04/10/2021 09:59:18 Case Description: The case concerns the breach of the applicant company s right to a tribunal established by law due to the participation of judge M.M. in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-58569
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark
Y.A.A. and F.H.M. v. Denmark CCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015 Communication number s : 2681/2015 Author: Y.A.A. and F.H.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Nov 2015 Date of decision 10 Mar 2017 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2681/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2293/en-US
Y.C. v. Denmark
Y.C. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013 Communication number s : 059/2013 Author: Y.C. represented by counsel City Advokaterne Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 59 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jan 2013 Date of decision 24 Oct 2014 JUTBCEDAW/C/59/D/59/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1882/en-US
Y.M. v. Russian Federation
Y.M. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011 Communication number s : 2059/2011 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Russian Federation Submission date 05 Jul 2010 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2059/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2113/en-US
Y.M. v. Spain
Y.M. v. Spain CRC/C/78/D/8/2016 Communication number s : 008/2016 Author: Y.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 78 Country Spain Submission date 16 Dec 2016 Date of decision 31 May 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/78/D/8/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2396/en-US
Y.W. v. Denmark
Y.W. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013 Communication number s : 051/2013 Author: Y.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 68 Country Denmark Submission date 02 Jan 2013 Date of decision 02 Mar 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/60/D/51/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2052/en-US
Y.Z. v. Belarus
Y.Z. v. Belarus CCPR/C/118/D/2135/2012 Communication number s : 2135/2012 Author: Y.Z. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country Belarus Submission date 01 Dec 2011 Date of decision 03 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2135/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2166/en-US
Y. v. Canada,Sri Lanka
Y. v. Canada Sri Lanka CCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013 Communication number s : 2280/2013 Author: Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 114 Country Canada Sri Lanka Submission date 29 Jul 2013 Date of decision 22 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2280/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1995/en-US
YAMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
YAMAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 15/05/2018 00:00:00 26/07/2018 10:34:58 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial on account of excessive length of proceedings lasted for nearly eight years and six months at two levels of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-49897