Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 173
A/HRC/46/5: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Belarus
United Nations A/HRC/46/5 General Assembly Distr.: General 4 January 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty sixth session 22 February 19 March 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/46/5https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc465-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-belarus
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
A/HRC/47/8: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Australia
United Nations A/HRC/47/8 General Assembly Distr.: General 24 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/8https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc478-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-australia
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand
A.U. and H.R. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015 Communication number s : 2567/2015 Author: A.U. and H.R. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 118 Country New Zealand Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2567/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2233/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
CASE OF ABDULLA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULLA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 30971/12 PIERCE G. GBR 6/30/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing 445 76 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003097112 FOURTH SECTION ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003097112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155715
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK
CASE OF BIAO v. DENMARK 38590/10 PETERSEN S. DNK 5/24/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Non ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0524JUD003859010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163115
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HANIF AND KHAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 52999/08 61779/08 HOWELLS GBR 12/20/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Pecuniary and non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Juries Act 1974 1974 Act 445 76 180 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:1220JUD005299908https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-108168
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF OLIARI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 18766/11 36030/11 SCHUSTER A. D AMICO M. CLARA M. PITEA C. ITA 7/21/2015 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0721JUD001876611https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-156265
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN
CASE OF SARGSYAN v. AZERBAIJAN 40167/06 GASPARYAN N. OHANYAN K. AZE 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Continuing situation Preliminary objection ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD004016706https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155662
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE INITIAL REPORT OF NIUE, ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE AT ITS SIXTY-SECOND SESSION (14 JANUARY–1 FEBRUARY 2013)
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS ON THE INITIAL REPORT OF NIUE ADOPTED BY THE COMMITTEE AT ITS SIXTY SECOND SESSION 14 JANUARY 1 FEBRUARY 2013 CRC/C/NIU/CO/1 NULL 2013 06 26T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/NIU/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 26 June 2013 UHRICRC/C/NIU/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/9e0aa568-dff5-4d2b-a5b7-d4dc0dcfbf36
Cayzer v. Australia
Cayzer v. Australia CCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017 Communication number s : 2981/2017 Author: Graham Cayzer Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Australia Submission date 13 Jul 2016 Date of decision 25 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2981/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3676/en-US
Dafnis v. Greece
Dafnis v. Greece CCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020 Communication number s : 3740/2020 Author: Andreas Dafnis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Greece Submission date 20 Apr 2020 Date of decision 19 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3740/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3678/en-US
Dean v. New Zealand
Dean v. New Zealand CCPR/C/95/D/1512/2006 Communication number s : 1512/2006 Author: Allan Kendrick Dean Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 95 Country New Zealand Submission date 08 Sep 2006 Date of decision 17 Mar 2009 Comment: An individual JUTBCCPR/C/95/D/1512/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1510/en-US
Fahmo Mohamud Hussein v. Denmark
Fahmo Mohamud Hussein v. Denmark CCPR/C/124/D/2734/2016 Communication number s : 2734/2016 Author: Fahmo Mohamud Hussein Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 124 Country Denmark Submission date 15 Feb 2016 Date of decision 18 Oct 2018 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/124/D/2734/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2558/en-US
Fifth Opinion on Denmark
Fifth Opinion on Denmark DNK ACFC/OP/V 2019 003 2019 11 07 2020 01 29 ACFC/OP/V 2019 003 Published on 29/01/2020 Secretariat of the Framework Convention for the Protection of National Minorities Council of Europe F 67075 Strasbourg Cedex FCNMACFC/OP/V(2019)003https://hudoc.fcnm.coe.int/eng?i=5th_OP_Denmark_en