Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1961
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland
5th Round Evaluation Report on Poland POL 2018 12 07 2019 01 28 Adoption: 7 December 2018 Publication: 28 January 2019 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2018 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2018)1-Final-eng-Poland-PUBLIC
A. A. C. v. Sweden
A. A. C. v. Sweden CAT/C/37/D/227/2003 Communication number s : 227/2003 Author: A.A.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 37 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Feb 2003 Date of decision 16 Nov 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/37/D/227/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/112/en-US
A A. v. Azerbaijan
A A. v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/35/D/247/2004 Communication number s : 247/2004 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 28 Feb 2004 Date of decision 25 Nov 2005 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/35/D/247/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/123/en-US
A.A. v. Switzerland
A.A. v. Switzerland CHE 02/05/2020 00:00:00 19/02/2020 17:13:47 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Risk of ill treatment of an asylum seeker in the case of his deportation to Afghanistan lack of a rigorous and thorough examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54771
A.B.V. v. Russia
A.B.V. v. Russia RUS 02/01/2019 00:00:00 24/01/2019 10:13:38 Case Description: The applicants in this group of cases are five mothers with unenforced residence orders in their favour over their children who were abducted by their former partners and one EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51193
A.B. v. the Netherlands
A.B. v. the Netherlands NLD 29/04/2002 00:00:00 27/10/2016 17:05:40 Case Description: Protection of correspondence: Unjustified interference due to the control of a detainee s correspondence with the European Commission of Human Rights by prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-4373
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
A.P., GARCON AND NICOT v. France
A.P. GARCON AND NICOT v. France FRA 06/07/2017 00:00:00 11/08/2017 14:38:41 Case Description: Protection of private life: Disproportionate interference with regard to the second and third applicants due to refusal of transgender persons requests to have EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47539
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3620/en-US
A.Y. v. Switzerland
A.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/74/D/887/2018 Communication number s : 887/2018 Author: A.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Switzerland Submission date 11 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/74/D/887/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3614/en-US
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
A v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CAT/C/67/D/854/2017 Communication number s : 854/2017 Author: A represented by counsel Philip Grant of TRIAL International Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 67 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 01 Nov JUTBCAT/C/67/D/854/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2623/en-US
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey
ABDULKADIR DEMIR v. Turkey TUR 09/10/2012 00:00:00 09/11/2016 15:45:01 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Non enforcement or delayed enforcement of domestic judicial decisions mostly delivered against entities owned or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35375
ABELE v. Latvia
ABELE v. Latvia LVA 29/01/2018 00:00:00 13/02/2018 17:06:02 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment / conditions of detention: Living conditions in Brasa Prison for a deaf/mute person. Article 3 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-48873
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania
ADRIAN CONSTANTIN v. Romania ROU 12/07/2011 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Unfair criminal proceedings which ended with the applicant s conviction to a suspended prison sentence for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16525
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark
AGGERHOLM v. Denmark DNK 15/12/2020 00:00:00 09/02/2021 09:54:42 Case Description: This case concerns the inhuman or degrading treatment in 2013 of a man suffering from paranoid schizophrenia who was strapped to a restraint bed in a psychiatric hospital EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56537
AKA v. Turkey
AKA v. Turkey TUR 23/09/1998 00:00:00 07/11/2016 17:30:19 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-26578
AKKUS v. Turkey
AKKUS v. Turkey TUR 09/07/1997 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property: Disproportionate interference due to the administration s delay in paying additional compensation for expropriation with regard to the difference between EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5460
AKTAS AND ASLANISKENDER v. Turkey
AKTAS AND ASLANISKENDER v. Turkey TUR 25/09/2019 00:00:00 30/10/2019 17:27:44 Case Description: The case concerns a violation of the right to respect for private life on account of the authorities refusal in 2007 of the applicants request for changing EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-54133