Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 6321 - 6340 of 6612
Stitou and Ben Hmdou v. Spain
Stitou and Ben Hmdou v. Spain E/C.12/72/D/86/2018 Communication number s : 86/2018 Author: Mohammed Stitou and Mariem Ben Hmdou Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 72 Country Spain Submission date 28 Nov 2018 Date of decision 10 Oct 2022 JUTBE/C.12/72/D/86/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3606/en-US
Stolyar v. Russian Federation
Stolyar v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/88/D/996/2001 Communication number s : 996/2001 Author: Vadim Stolyar Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Feb 1999 Date of decision 31 Oct 2006 JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/996/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1311/en-US
Summary of Stakeholders’ submissions on the United States of America - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3 General Assembly Distr.: General 6 March 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty sixth session 4 15 May 2020 Summary of Stakeholders submissions on the United UPRA/HRC/WG.6/36/USA/3https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/summary-stakeholders-submissions-united-states-america-report-office-united
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security (ETS No. 078A)
Supplementary Agreement for the Application of the European Convention on Social Security ETS No. 078A 078A Paris 1972 12 14T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States signatories to Treaty ETS 78 and for accession by the non member States COEETS No. 078Ahttps://rm.coe.int/1680074619
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia
Susith Wasitha Ranawaka v. Australia CAT/C/68/D/855/2017 Communication number s : 855/2017 Author: Susith Wasitha Ranawaka represented by counsel Michaela Byers Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Australia Submission date 20 Nov JUTBCAT/C/68/D/855/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2699/en-US
T. A. v. Sweden
T. A. v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/226/2003 Communication number s : 226/2003 Author: T. A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 16 Jan 2003 Date of decision 06 May 2005 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/34/D/226/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/138/en-US
T.A. v. Switzerland
T.A. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/914/2019 Communication number s : 914/2019 Author: T.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 13 Feb 2019 Date of decision 28 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/73/D/914/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3052/en-US
T.C. v. Peru
T.C. v. Peru CAT/C/75/D/930/2019 Communication number s : 930/2019 Author: T.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Peru Submission date 31 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/75/D/930/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3738/en-US
T.K.T. v. Switzerland
T.K.T. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/866/2018 Communication number s : 866/2018 Author: T.K.T. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 16 Mar 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/71/D/866/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3373/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/228/2003 Communication number s : 228/2003 Author: T.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 06 Mar 2003 Date of decision 18 Nov 2003 Comment: Committee member Mr. Fernando Mari o Men JUTBCAT/C/31/D/228/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/154/en-US
T.M. v. Sweden
T.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/68/D/860/2018 Communication number s : 860/2018 Author: T.M. represented by counsel Daniel Carnestedt Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Jan 2018 Date of decision 06 Dec 2019 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/68/D/860/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2702/en-US
T.P. AND K.M. v. the United Kingdom
T.P. AND K.M. v. the United Kingdom GBR 10/05/2001 00:00:00 26/10/2016 20:41:06 Case Description: Protection of family life: Disproportionate interference due to the failure of the local authority to ensure adequate involvement of a mother in the decision EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-2484
T.P.F. v. Peru
T.P.F. v. Peru CEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009 Communication number s : 022/2009 Author: T.P.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 50 Country Peru Submission date 18 Jun 2009 Date of decision 17 Oct 2011 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/50/D/22/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1704/en-US
T.P.S. v. Canada
T.P.S. v. Canada CAT/C/24/D/99/1997 Communication number s : 099/1997 Author: T.P.S. name withheld Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Canada Submission date 19 Nov 1997 Date of decision 16 May 2000 Comment: An individual opinion JUTBCAT/C/24/D/99/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/216/en-US
T.S. v. Russian Federation
T.S. v. Russian Federation CEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014 Communication number s : 69/2014 Author: T.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 66 Country Russian Federation Submission date 07 May 2014 Date of decision 28 Feb 2017 Comment: This JUTBCEDAW/C/66/D/69/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3448/en-US
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia
T.W. and G.M. v. Slovakia CCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010 Communication number s : 1963/2010 Author: T.W. and G.M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 110 Country Slovakia Submission date 23 Feb 2009 Date of decision 25 Mar 2014 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1963/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1812/en-US
TASEV v. North Macedonia
TASEV v. North Macedonia MKD 16/08/2019 00:00:00 26/08/2019 11:34:26 Case Description: Protection of private life: Unforeseeable interference due to the authorities refusal in 2012 to grant the applicant s request to have his ethnicity entry in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52659
TRIVKANOVIC v. Croatia (no. 2)
TRIVKANOVIC v. Croatia no. 2 HRV 21/04/2021 00:00:00 11/05/2021 15:56:40 Case Description: Functioning of justice: Denial of access to a court due to the domestic courts manifestly unreasonable refusal to reopen civil proceedings against the State seeking EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-57593
TSIRLIS & KOULOUMPAS v. Greece
TSIRLIS KOULOUMPAS v. Greece GRC 29/05/1997 00:00:00 07/11/2016 09:36:22 Case Description: Protection of rights in detention and access to and effective functioning of justice: Arbitrary detention of Jehovah s Witnesses ministers following the authorities EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-22126
TSMOKALOV v. Ukraine
TSMOKALOV v. Ukraine UKR 03/11/2022 00:00:00 14/11/2022 14:58:48 Case Description: The case concerns an error of the applicant s diagnosis and as a consequence an inappropriate medical treatment which took place in state hospitals in 2001 and 2002 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-61860