Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 4916
A.B. v. Germany
A.B. v. Germany CAT/C/64/D/727/2016 Communication number s : 727/2016 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Hana Frankova Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 64 Country Germany Submission date 05 Feb 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/727/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2462/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A/HRC/41/15/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Cyprus - Addendum
United Nations A/HRC/41/15/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 20 June 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty first session 24 June 12 July 2019 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/41/15/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4115add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-cyprus
A/HRC/47/11: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Oman
United Nations A/HRC/47/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/11https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4711-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-oman
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
A.M. v. Finland
A.M. v. Finland CCPR/C/45/D/398/1990 Communication number s : 398/1990 Author: A.M. name deleted on behalf of his wife Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 45 Country Finland Submission date 24 Jan 1990 Date of decision 23 Jul 1992 JUTBCCPR/C/45/D/398/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/623/en-US
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
A.R.U. v. Netherlands
A.R.U. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/49/D/509/1992 Communication number s : 509/1992 Author: A.R.U. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Netherlands Submission date 21 Apr 1992 Date of decision 19 Oct 1993 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/509/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/393/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
A.W.K. v. New Zealand
A.W.K. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010 Communication number s : 1998/2010 Author: A.W.K. represented by counsel Frank Deliu Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 112 Country New Zealand Submission date 02 Aug 2010 Date of decision 28 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1998/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1896/en-US
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark
A.W.R.A.P. v. Denmark CERD/C/71/D/37/2006 Communication number s : 037/2006 Author: A.W.R.A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Jul 2006 Date of decision 08 Aug 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/71/D/37/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1735/en-US
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy
A.Y.O.AQ v. Italy CCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019 Communication number s : 3587/2019 Author: A.Y.O.AQ Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 134 Country Italy Submission date 02 May 2018 Date of decision 25 Mar 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/3587/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3145/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan
A. et al. v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002 Communication number s : 1079/2002 Author: A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 98 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 29 Apr 2002 Date of decision 19 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1079/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1545/en-US
Açikkollu v. Türkiye
A ikkollu v. T rkiye CCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020 Communication number s : 3730/2020 Author: M m ne A ikkollu Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country T rkiye Submission date 29 Jan 2020 Date of decision 25 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3730/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3761/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia
ANCHUGOV AND GLADKOV v. Russia RUS 09/12/2013 00:00:00 04/11/2016 11:41:33 Case Description: These two cases concern the blanket ban on voting rights imposed automatically pursuant to Article 32 3 of the Constitution on all convicted offenders deprived of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-14110
ANDRONE v. Romania
ANDRONE v. Romania ROU 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 15:17:22 Case Description: Protection of property and access to and efficient functioning of justice: Quashing of a final judgment ordering return of nationalized property following a request lodged by EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-16101
ARRAS AND OTHERS v. Italy
ARRAS AND OTHERS v. Italy ITA 14/05/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 09:13:26 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Retroactive legislative interference in litigation between private parties without compelling reason of general EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28252
ARUTYUNOV v. Russia
ARUTYUNOV v. Russia RUS 18/03/2019 00:00:00 05/04/2019 11:14:01 Case Description: Violation of the applicant s right to property on account of a prohibition to sell his car for several years following a registration authorities mistake vehicle s engine EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51871