Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 365
A/HRC/38/5/Add.1: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Tonga - AddendumViews on conclusions and/or recommendations, voluntary commitments and replies presented by the State under review
United Nations A/HRC/38/5/Add.1 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 June 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty eighth session 18 June 6 July 2018 Agenda item 6 Universal Periodic Review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic UPRA/HRC/38/5/Add.1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc385add1-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-tonga-addendumviews
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
Arenz et al. v. Germany
Arenz et al. v. Germany CCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002 Communication number s : 1138/2002 Author: Paul Arenz Thomas R der and Dagmar R der Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Germany Submission date 26 Sep 2002 Date of decision 24 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/1138/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1062/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF BĂRBULESCU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF B RBULESCU v. ROMANIA 61496/08 COSTINESCU D. JUVERDEANU O. ROU 1/12/2016 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Positive obligations Article 8 1 Respect for ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0112JUD006149608https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-159906
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA
CASE OF BAYATYAN v. ARMENIA 23459/03 CARBONNEAU A. BURNS J.M. KHACHATRYAN R. ARM 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 Non pecuniary damage award Article 75 of the Criminal Code 154 237 152 269 354 216 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002345903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105611
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 10843/84 N/A GBR 9/27/1990 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 8 No violation of Art. 12 451 429 203 319 450 240 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0927JUD001084384 COURT PLENARY CASE OF COSSEY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM Application no. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1990:0927JUD001084384https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57641
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE
CASE OF DAVYDOV AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE 17674/02 39081/02 ZHERDEV G. BUSHCHENKO A. UKR 7/1/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 37 Striking out applications general Art. 37 1 Striking out applications Struck out of the list Art. 37 Striking ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0701JUD001767402https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-99750
CASE OF ENVER ŞAHİN v. TURKEY
CASE OF ENVER AH N v. TURKEY 23065/12 ELBAN S. ELBAN H.K. ERBEK F. TUR 1/30/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 P1 2 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 2 of Protocol No. 1 Right to education general Non pecuniary damage ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0130JUD002306512https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-180499
CASE OF GLASENAPP v. GERMANY
CASE OF GLASENAPP v. GERMANY 9228/80 N/A DEU 8/28/1986 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected incompatibility Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion No violation of Art. 10 149 148 14 128 ECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0828JUD000922880 COURT PLENARY CASE OF ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1986:0828JUD000922880https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57494
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY
CASE OF ILNSEHER v. GERMANY 10211/12 27505/14 AHMED A. TEGEBAUER I. J. DEU 12/4/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 e Persons of unsound mind No violation of Article 7 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:1204JUD001021112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-187540
CASE OF KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KIMLYA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 76836/01 32782/03 HODKIN P. KRYLOVA G. KUZMICHEV M. RUS 10/1/2009 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 9 read in the light of Art. 11 Non pecuniary damage award Section 9 1 of the Religions Act 26 126 184 243 145 146 154 152 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:1001JUD007683601https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94565
CASE OF LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY
CASE OF LOIZIDOU v. TURKEY 15318/89 DEMETRIADES A. TUR 12/18/1996 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected ratione temporis Violation of P1 1 No violation of Art. 8 Just satisfaction reserved Prohibited Military Areas Decree of 1979 section 9 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1996:1218JUD001531889https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58007
CASE OF MACATĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF MACAT v. LITHUANIA 61435/19 MIZARAS V. WINTEMUTE R. DINGILEVSKIS M. LTU 1/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0123JUD006143519https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222072
CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA
CASE OF MANOLE AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA 13936/02 NAGACEVSCHI V. GRIBINCEA V. MDA 9/17/2009 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Violation of Art. 10 Just satisfaction reserved Article 4 of Governmental Decision No. 502 1996 Article 13 2 of Law No. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0917JUD001393602https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-94075
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753