Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 121
A/HRC/47/11: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Oman
United Nations A/HRC/47/11 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/11https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4711-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-oman
Bakhtiyari v. Australia
Bakhtiyari v. Australia CCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002 Communication number s : 1069/2002 Author: Ali Aqsar Bakhtiyari and Roqaiha Bakhtiyari Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 79 Country Australia Submission date 25 Mar 2002 Date of decision 29 Oct JUTBCCPR/C/79/D/1069/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1092/en-US
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA
CASE OF CHIRAGOV AND OTHERS v. ARMENIA 13216/05 MULLER M. VINE C. BUTLER M. IVERS M. POYNOR B. SWAROOP S. YILDIZ K. ARM 6/16/2015 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Article 35 3 Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0616JUD001321605https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155353
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA 26261/05 26377/06 HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE MEMORIAL RUS 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nulla poena sine lege ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002626105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117127
CASE OF OBSERVER AND GUARDIAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF OBSERVER AND GUARDIAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 13585/88 N/A GBR 11/26/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 13 or 14 10 Costs and expenses partial award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1126JUD001358588https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57705
CASE OF PORMES v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF PORMES v. THE NETHERLANDS 25402/14 VAN DIJK B. NLD 7/28/2020 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 Expulsion Article 8 1 Respect for private life 451 628 429 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0728JUD002540214 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:0728JUD002540214https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-203836
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 2)
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 2 13166/87 N/A GBR 11/26/1991 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 13 and 14 10 Costs and expenses award domestic proceedings Costs and expenses award Convention proceedings Attorney ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1991:1126JUD001316687https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57708
D and E v. Australia
D and E v. Australia CCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002 Communication number s : 1050/2002 Author: D and E and their two children Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Australia Submission date 01 Feb 2002 Date of decision 11 Jul 2006 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1050/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1275/en-US
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
H.K v. Australia
H.K v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/701/2015 Communication number s : 701/2015 Author: H.K Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60th session Country Australia Submission date 16 Sep 2015 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: Views violation. JUTBCAT/C/60/D/701/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2327/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bahrain, Ecuador and Tunisia
Human Rights CouncilMORNING AND MIDDAY 19 September 2012Concludes Interactive Dialogue with Human Rights Council Advisory Committee and Starts Debate on Human Rights Bodies and MechanismsThe Human Rights Council today adopted the outcome of the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bahrain
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom, India and Brazil
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom India and Brazil.Karen Pierce Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-kingdom
J.X.F.P. v. Australia
J.X.F.P. v. Australia CAT/C/75/D/770/2016 Communication number s : 770/2016 Author: J.X.F.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country Australia Submission date 26 Aug 2016 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/75/D/770/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3739/en-US
Jongenburger-Veerman v. Netherlands
Jongenburger Veerman v. Netherlands CCPR/C/85/D/1238/2004 Communication number s : 1238/2004 Author: G. J. Jongenburger Veerman Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Netherlands Submission date 07 Nov 2003 Date of decision 01 Nov 2005 JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1238/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/989/en-US
Nasir v. Australia
Nasir v. Australia CCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012 Communication number s : 2229/2012 Author: Nasir Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Australia Submission date 24 Oct 2012 Date of decision 29 Mar 2016 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2229/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3091/en-US
Pillai et al. v. Canada
Pillai et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008 Communication number s : 1763/2008 Author: Ernest Sigman Pillai and Laeticia Swenthi Joachimpillai Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 101 Country Canada Submission date 29 Feb 2008 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/101/D/1763/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1631/en-US