Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 54
A.B.H. v. Denmark
A.B.H. v. Denmark CCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015 Communication number s : 2603/2015 Author: A.B.H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Apr 2015 Date of decision 08 Jul 2019 Comment: An individual opinion by JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2603/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2778/en-US
A.S. v. Sweden
A.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/74/D/949/2019 Communication number s : 949/2019 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Sweden Submission date 26 Jul 2019 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/74/D/949/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3611/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF A.M. v. THE NETHERLANDS 29094/09 TER MEULEN MOUWEN E. NLD 7/5/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 13 3 Right to an ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0705JUD002909409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-164460
CASE OF AL-JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL JEDDA v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 27021/08 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 5 1 Non pecuniary damage award Regulation No. 1 of the Coalition Provisional Authority 293 210 448 220 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD002702108https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105612
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF H. AND B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF H. AND B. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 70073/10 44539/11 WILSON SOLICITORS LLP MALIK AND MALIK SOLICITORS GBR 4/9/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Afghanistan 350 620 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0409JUD007007310https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-118339
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HASSAN v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 29750/09 SHINER P. OTTY T. HICKMAN T. GBR 9/16/2014 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Deprivation of liberty Lawful arrest or detention No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0916JUD002975009https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146501
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF HODE AND ABDI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 22341/09 THRILLING I. GBR 11/6/2012 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 1 Respect for family life Respect for home Article 8 Right to respect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1106JUD002234109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114244
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KASYMAKHUNOV AND SAYBATALOV v. RUSSIA 26261/05 26377/06 HUMAN RIGHTS CENTRE MEMORIAL RUS 3/14/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nulla poena sine lege ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0314JUD002626105https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117127
CASE OF MOUVEMENT RAËLIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF MOUVEMENT RA LIEN SUISSE v. SWITZERLAND 16354/06 ELKAIM E. CHE 7/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 3 Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression General Article 10 1 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0713JUD001635406https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-112165
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
H.G. v. Sweden
H.G. v. Sweden CCPR/C/132/D/3266/2018 Communication number s : 3266/2018 Author: H.G. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Nov 2018 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3266/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3178/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Oman, Austria, and Rwanda
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Oman Austria and Rwanda. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Oman were Nepal Pakistan Philippines Qatar Russian Federation Saudi Arabia UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-oman-austria
J.D. v. Denmark
J.D. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2204/2012 Communication number s : 2204/2012 Author: J.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 18 Sep 2012 Date of decision 26 Oct 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2204/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2217/en-US
J.I. v. Sweden
J.I. v. Sweden CCPR/C/128/D/3032/2017 Communication number s : 3032/2017 Author: J.I. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Sweden Submission date 31 Oct 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of Committee JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3032/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2829/en-US
M.L.A. v. Sweden
M.L.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/135/D/3216/2018 Communication number s : 3216/2018 Author: M.L.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 135 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Jul 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3216/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3675/en-US