Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 201 - 220 of 12135
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
B.V. v. Belgium
B.V. v. Belgium BEL 02/08/2017 00:00:00 11/09/2017 09:42:58 Case Description: Protection against ill treatment: Lack of serious and thorough investigations carried after the applicant had lodged a criminal complaint alleging rape and indecent assault. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47595
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands
B.d.B. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/35/D/273/1988 Communication number s : 273/1988 Author: B.d.B. G.B. C.J.K. L.P.M.W. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 35 Country Netherlands Submission date 14 Jan 1988 Date of decision 30 Mar 1989 JUTBCCPR/C/35/D/273/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/427/en-US
B. v. Romania (no. 2)
B. v. Romania no. 2 ROU 19/05/2013 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: Lack of adequate legal protection of the applicant on the occasion of her psychiatric confinements as from 2000 and during proceedings which led to maintaining the measure EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13089
BABADAG v. Turkey
BABADAG v. Turkey TUR 12/01/2011 00:00:00 09/11/2016 16:14:15 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-35626
BAJRAMI v. Albania
BAJRAMI v. Albania ALB 12/03/2007 00:00:00 24/10/2016 16:48:47 Case Description: Protection of family life: Failure to take necessary measures to reunite a divorced father with his child abducted abroad and lack of an effective remedy for preventing or EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-237
BAK v. Poland
BAK v. Poland POL 16/04/2007 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:36:03 Case Description: The cases of Bak and Majewski concern the excessive length of criminal and civil proceedings respectively violations of Article 6 1 . They also concern certain problems in the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-20594
BAKOVA v. Slovakia
BAKOVA v. Slovakia SVK 12/02/2003 00:00:00 02/11/2016 13:55:44 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Infringement of the right to a public hearing before a tribunal in proceedings concerning a claim for restitution of property. EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-7869
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania
BALKUNAS v. Lithuania LTU 07/07/2020 00:00:00 21/07/2020 14:49:16 Case Description: This case concerns the disproportionate limitation of the applicant s right of access to a tribunal due to the refusal of the Supreme Court in 2017 to partly exempt him EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55627
BALSAN v. Romania
BALSAN v. Romania ROU 23/08/2017 00:00:00 15/09/2017 15:07:24 Case Description: This case concerns the failure of the investigating prosecuting and judicial authorities to comply with their positive obligation under Article 3 to protect the applicant from EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-47601
BAPTISTA DO ROSARIO v. Portugal
BAPTISTA DO ROSARIO v. Portugal PRT 04/04/2002 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9493
BAR-BAU SP. Z O. O. v. Poland
BAR BAU SP. Z O. O. v. Poland POL 10/04/2012 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Insufficient reasons given bythe Supreme Court of Cassation for refusing the cassation appeal on points of law in civil proceedings for damages instituted against EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19235
BARAC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro
BARAC AND OTHERS v. Montenegro MNE 13/03/2012 00:00:00 02/11/2016 17:36:39 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Final domestic judgment based on a law which was no longer in forceat the relevant time. Status of Execution: The EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-11162
BARAN v. Poland
BARAN v. Poland POL 28/08/2013 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:13:46 Case Description: Unlawful deprivation of liberty in a psychiatric hospital refusal of civil claim for compensation by the domestic courts disregarding a final judicial decision in another set of EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-19529
BARATA DIAS v. Portugal
BARATA DIAS v. Portugal PRT 04/10/2001 00:00:00 02/11/2016 16:02:55 Case Description: Access to and effective functioning of justice: Excessive length of civil proceedings. Article 6 1 Status of Execution: Case closed. Main measures adopted: Individual EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-9961
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy
BARLETTA AND FARNETANO v. Italy ITA 26/03/2020 00:00:00 27/03/2020 17:50:04 Case Description: The Trapani group of cases formerly part of the Ceteroni group concerns the excessive length of proceedings before the civil courts violations of Article 6 1 and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55019
BARRILLOT v. France
BARRILLOT v. France FRA 29/07/2003 00:00:00 08/11/2016 11:10:23 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Excessive length of criminal proceedings in particular excessive length of the pre trial investigation stage. Article 6 1 EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-32553