Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 4354
9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 9. Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment New York 10 December 1984 Entry into force : 26 June 1987 in accordance with article 27 1 . 1 UNIV-9https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-9&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.A.M. v. Sweden
A.A.M. v. Sweden CAT/C/48/D/413/2010 Communication number s : 413/2010 Author: A.A.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Sweden Submission date 19 Feb 2010 Date of decision 23 May 2012 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/48/D/413/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/49/en-US
A.A. v. Sweden
A.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/72/D/918/2019 Communication number s : 918/2019 Author: A.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Sweden Submission date 15 Feb 2019 Date of decision 24 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/72/D/918/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3078/en-US
A.B. v. Canada
A.B. v. Canada CCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014 Communication number s : 2387/2014 Author: A.B. represented by counsel Laura Brittain then Benjamin Liston Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Canada Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2387/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2197/en-US
A.F. v. Italy
A.F. v. Italy CEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019 Communication number s : 148/2019 Author: A.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Italy Submission date 16 Aug 2018 Date of decision 20 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/148/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3205/en-US
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2
A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 A/HRC/27/56/Add.2 NULL 2014 08 28T00:00:00 SR Truth justice reparation Addendum Mission to Uruguay Summary The Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth justice reparation and guarantees of non recurrence Pablo de Greiff paid an UHRIA/HRC/27/56/Add.2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/8159e491-d477-481e-be72-8ac2a8107329
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A and B v. Azerbaijan
A and B v. Azerbaijan CAT/C/74/D/905/2018 Communication number s : 905/2018 Author: A and B Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Azerbaijan Submission date 22 Dec 2018 Date of decision 27 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/74/D/905/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3586/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
A. v. Denmark
A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013 Communication number s : 53/2013 Author: A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 62 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Apr 2013 Date of decision 19 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/62/D/53/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3027/en-US
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
Abbassi v. Algeria
Abbassi v. Algeria CCPR/C/89/D/1172/2003 Communication number s : 1172/2003 Author: Salim Abbassi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Algeria Submission date 31 Mar 2003 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: Individual opinions JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1172/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1354/en-US
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018 3207/2018 Communication number s : 3201/2018 3202/2018 3203/2018 3204/2018 3205/2018 3206/2018 3207/2018 3200/2018 Author: Mukhamadrasul Abdurasulov Osmonali Otamirzaev Bakhodir Zhalalov Abdurashit JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018-3207/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3645/en-US