Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 461 - 480 of 1102
Conclusions 2021 - Moldova - Article 11-1
Conclusions 2021 Moldova Article 11 1 MDA 11 01 000 31/12/2021 15/02/2022 Article 11 Right to protection of health Paragraph 1 Removal of the causes of ill health The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by the ESC2021/def/MDA/11/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2021/def/MDA/11/1/EN
Conclusions 2021 - Montenegro - Article 11-1
Conclusions 2021 Montenegro Article 11 1 MNE 11 01 000 31/12/2021 17/02/2022 Article 11 Right to protection of health Paragraph 1 Removal of the causes of ill health The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by ESC2021/def/MNE/11/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2021/def/MNE/11/1/EN
Conclusions 2022 - Armenia - Article 2-6
Conclusions 2022 Armenia Article 2 6 ARM 02 06 163 20/01/2023 24/02/2023 Article 2 Right to just conditions of work Paragraph 6 Information on the employment contract The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by ESC2022/def/ARM/2/6/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=2022/def/ARM/2/6/EN
Conclusions XIII-4 - Denmark - Article 16
Conclusions XIII 4 Denmark Article 16 DNK 16 00 000 30/09/1996 30/09/1996 Article 16 Right of the family to social legal and economic protection The Committee noted the information contained in the Danish report in response to its request for information ESCXIII-4/def/DNK/16//ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XIII-4/def/DNK/16//EN
Conclusions XV-2 - Spain - Article 18-2
Conclusions XV 2 Spain Article 18 2 ESP 18 02 000 31/12/2001 31/12/2001 Article 18 Right to engage in a gainful occupation in the territory of other States Parties Paragraph 2 Simplifying existing formalities and reducing dues and taxes The Committee ESCXV-2/def/ESP/18/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XV-2/def/ESP/18/2/EN
Conclusions XX-1 - Croatia - Article 1-2
Conclusions XX 1 Croatia Article 1 2 HRV 01 02 000 07/12/2012 07/12/2012 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of the information contained in the ESCXX-1/def/HRV/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XX-1/def/HRV/1/2/EN
Conclusions XXII-1 - Poland - Article 1-2
Conclusions XXII 1 Poland Article 1 2 POL 01 02 000 29/01/2021 02/02/2021 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of the information contained in the ESCXXII-1/def/POL/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-1/def/POL/1/2/EN
Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention
Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention CAT/C/GHA/CO/1/1 NULL 2011 06 15T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/GHA/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 15 June 2011 and Other Cruel Inhuman or UHRICAT/C/GHA/CO/1/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5cb7ba51-1ee7-469a-b820-0fb35317e599
Conteris v. Uruguay
Conteris v. Uruguay CCPR/C/25/D/139/1983 Communication number s : 139/1983 Author: Ilda Thomas alleged victim s sister Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Uruguay Submission date 16 Mar 1983 Date of decision 17 Jul 1985 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/25/D/139/1983https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/317/en-US
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
D.C. v. Switzerland
D.C. v. Switzerland CAT/C/73/D/889/2018 Communication number s : 889/2018 Author: D.C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Oct 2018 Date of decision 22 Apr 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/73/D/889/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3334/en-US
D.K.N. v. Spain
D.K.N. v. Spain CRC/C/80/D/15/2017 Communication number s : 015/2017 Author: D.K.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 80 Country Spain Submission date 13 Mar 2017 Date of decision 01 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/80/D/15/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2509/en-US
D.Z. v. Netherlands
D.Z. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016 Communication number s : 2918/2016 Author: D.Z. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Netherlands Submission date 23 Nov 2016 Date of decision 19 Oct 2020 Comment: Individual opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2918/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3295/en-US
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador
Dassum and Dassum v. Ecuador CCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013 Communication number s : 2244/2013 Author: Roberto Isa as Dassum and William Isa as Dassum Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ecuador Submission date 12 Mar 2012 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2244/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3094/en-US
Dayras et al. v. France
Dayras et al. v. France CEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007 Communication number s : 013/2007 Author: Mich le Dayras Nelly Campo Trumel Sylvie Delange Fr d rique Remy Cremieu Micheline Zeghouani H l ne Muzard Fekkar and Ad le Daufrene Levrard Type of decision: JUTBCEDAW/C/44/D/13/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1712/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation LO and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees TCO v. Sweden Complaint No. 85/2012 SWE 06 02 000 06 04 000 19 04 000 03/07/2013 05/02/2014 European Committee of Social ESCcc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Confédération française de l'Encadrement CFE-CGC v. France, Collective Complaint No. 16/2003
Decision on the merits: Conf d ration fran aise de l Encadrement CFE CGC v. France Collective Complaint No. 16/2003 FRA 02 01 000 04 02 000 06 04 000 27 00 163 12/10/2004 31/03/2005 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux ESCcc-16-2003-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-16-2003-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No.148/2017
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists ICJ v. Czech Republic Complaint No.148/2017 CZE 17 00 035 2020 10 20 2021 03 17 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 20 October ESCcc-148-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-148-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and Inclusion Europe v. Belgium: Complaint No. 141/2017
Decision on the merits: International Federation for Human Rights FIDH and Inclusion Europe v. Belgium: Complaint No. 141/2017 BEL 15 01 000 91 172 163 17 02 163 91 178 163 2020 09 09 2021 02 03 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-141-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-141-2017-dmerits-en