Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 1067
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
A.L. v. Italy
A.L. v. Italy CCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015 Communication number s : 2570/2015 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 126 Country Italy Submission date 09 Oct 2014 Date of decision 26 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2570/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2894/en-US
A.L. v. Russian Federation
A.L. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/132/D/3038/2017 Communication number s : 3038/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Russian Federation Submission date 14 Feb 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3038/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3175/en-US
A.N.A. v. Denmark
A.N.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015 Communication number s : 094/2015 Author: A.N.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 73 Country Denmark Submission date 14 Sep 2015 Date of decision 15 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/94/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2656/en-US
Aïcha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria
A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011 Communication number s : 2086/2011 Author: A cha Dehimi and Noura Ayache represented by Philippe Grant of Track Impunity Always TRIAL a Swiss association against impunity Type of decision: JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2086/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1911/en-US
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia
AVAKEMYAN v. Armenia ARM 30/03/2017 00:00:00 30/01/2018 15:07:59 Case Description: This group of four cases concerns the non enforcement or delayed enforcement of final domestic judgments adopted in favour of the applicants notably concerning property EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46455
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus
Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. v. Belarus CCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012 Communication number s : 2201/2012 Author: Aleksandr Tyvanchuk et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Feb 2012 Date of decision 26 Mar 2018 JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2201/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2439/en-US
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco
Ali Aarrass v. Morocco CAT/C/68/D/817/2017 Communication number s : 817/2017 Author: Ali Aarrass represented by counsel Dounia Alamat and Christophe Marchand Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 68 Country Morocco Submission date 17 Mar 2017 JUTBCAT/C/68/D/817/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2695/en-US
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka
Asantha Aravinda v. Sri Lanka CCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014 Communication number s : 2508/2014 Author: Dodanpegamage Asantha Aravinda Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Sri Lanka Submission date 31 Oct 2011 Date of decision 02 Jul 2021 JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2508/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3197/en-US
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago
Ashby v. Trinidad and Tobago CCPR/C/74/D/580/1994 Communication number s : 580/1994 Author: Glenn Ashby Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 74 Country Trinidad and Tobago Submission date 06 Jul 1994 Date of decision 21 Mar 2002 Comment: Under JUTBCCPR/C/74/D/580/1994https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/951/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.S. v. Austria
B.S. v. Austria CAT/C/75/D/1118/2022 Communication number s : 1118/2022 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Austria Submission date 08 Dec 2021 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/75/D/1118/2022https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3619/en-US
B.Z. et al. v. Albania
B.Z. et al. v. Albania CCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016 Communication number s : 2837/2016 Author: B.Z. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 121 Country Albania Submission date 13 Jan 2016 Date of decision 08 Nov 2017 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2837/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2362/en-US
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine
BALITSKIY v. Ukraine UKR 03/02/2012 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:28:05 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the convictions of the applicants between 2002 and 2011 on the basis of self incriminating statements made in the absence of a lawyer and in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31116
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey
BATI AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 03/09/2004 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of judgments 1 concerns the ineffectiveness of investigations criminal prosecutions and disciplinary proceedings in relation to killing torture ill EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37206
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom
BEGHAL v. the United Kingdom GBR 28/05/2019 00:00:00 12/06/2019 17:29:15 Case Description: Protection of private life: Arbitrary interference due to the use of counter terrorism legislation by border control officers Schedule 7 Powers to stop and question EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-52217
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania
BRAGADIREANU v. Romania ROU 06/03/2008 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: This group currently consisting of 121 judgments 1 mainly concerns the inhuman and/or degrading treatment suffered by the applicants due to overcrowding and poor EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12985