Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 3821 - 3835 of 3835
Yuri Bolshakov v. Russian Federation
Yuri Bolshakov v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/112/D/1946/2010 Communication number s : 1946/2010 Author: Yuri Bolshakov not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Feb 2010 JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1946/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1886/en-US
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation
Yury Orkin v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014 Communication number s : 2410/2014 Author: Yury Orkin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Russian Federation Submission date 16 Dec 2013 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2410/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2781/en-US
Z.T. v. Norway
Z.T. v. Norway CAT/C/35/D/238/2003 Communication number s : 238/2003 Author: Z.T. No.2 Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 35 Country Norway Submission date 31 Jul 2001 Date of decision 14 Nov 2005 Comment: The author s previous communication JUTBCAT/C/35/D/238/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/128/en-US
Z. v. Australia
Z. v. Australia CAT/C/53/D/511/2012 Communication number s : 511/2012 Author: Z. represented by Norman Gibson Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 53 Country Australia Submission date 29 Sep 2011 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/511/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2057/en-US
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania
Z v. United Republic of Tanzania CRPD/C/22/D/24/2014 Communication number s : 24/2014 Author: Z Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country United Republic of Tanzania Submission date 12 Jun 2014 Date of decision 19 Sep 2019 Comment: This JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/24/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3131/en-US
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine
ZELENCHUK AND TSYTSYURA v. Ukraine UKR 22/08/2018 00:00:00 05/09/2018 11:48:13 Case Description: The cases 1 of this group concern the long lasting moratorium on the alienation of agricultural land found by the Court to be in violation of the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-50173
Ziablitsev v. France
Ziablitsev v. France E/C.12/71/D/176/2020 Communication number s : 176/2020 Author: Sergei Ziablitsev Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country France Submission date 06 Jan 2020 Date of decision 02 Mar 2022 Comment: This document JUTBE/C.12/71/D/176/2020https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3000/en-US
Zilkija Selimović et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina
Zilkija Selimovi et al. v. Bosnia and Herzegovina CCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010 Communication number s : 2003/2010 Author: Zilkija Selimovi et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 111 Country Bosnia and Herzegovina Submission date 04 May 2010 Date JUTBCCPR/C/111/D/2003/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1859/en-US
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan
Zoolfia v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007 Communication number s : 1585/2007 Author: Batyrova Zoolfia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 96 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 06 Jul 2007 Date of decision 30 Jul 2009 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/96/D/1585/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1521/en-US
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth EVALUATION round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors SECOND COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2017 10 18 2017 10 20 I. INTRODUCTION The Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the GRECOGrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2017-17-Final-eng-Luxembourg-2ndRC-PUBLIC
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG
fourth evaluation round Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2015 06 19 2015 07 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Luxembourg authorities GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-5E-Final-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
Äärelä and Näkkäläjärvi v. Finland
rel and N kk l j rvi v. Finland CCPR/C/73/D/779/1997 Communication number s : 779/1997 Author: Anni rel and Jouni N kk l j rvi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Finland Submission date 04 Nov 1997 Date of decision 24 Oct 2001 JUTBCCPR/C/73/D/779/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/939/en-US
v. Argentina
v. Argentina CAT/C/52/D/366/2008 Communication number s : 366/2008 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Argentina Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/366/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1827/en-US
v. Burundi
v. Burundi CAT/C/52/D/503/2012 Communication number s : 503/2012 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Burundi Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/503/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1839/en-US
v. Denmark
v. Denmark CAT/C/52/D/466/2011 Communication number s : 466/2011 Author: Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: No issues found JUTBCAT/C/52/D/466/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1829/en-US