Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 13 of 13
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF GÎRLEANU v. ROMANIA
CASE OF G RLEANU v. ROMANIA 50376/09 HATNEANU D. O. ROU 6/26/2018 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression general Article 10 1 Freedom of expression Non pecuniary damage award Article 41 Non pecuniary damage Just satisfaction Articles 12 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0626JUD005037609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-184064
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF ILAŞCU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF ILA CU AND OTHERS v. MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 48787/99 N/A MDA RUS 7/8/2004 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Inhuman treatment Substantive aspect the Republic of Moldova ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2004:0708JUD004878799https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-61886
CASE OF SAADI v. ITALY
CASE OF SAADI v. ITALY 37201/06 CLEMENTI S. MANARA B. ITA 2/28/2008 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Expulsion Conditional Tunisia Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 350 620 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0228JUD003720106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-85276
CASE OF TRABELSI v. BELGIUM
CASE OF TRABELSI v. BELGIUM 140/10 CHATEAU A. BEL 9/4/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Extradition the United ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0904JUD000014010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146372
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review DPRK
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review DPRK A/HRC/42/10 NULL 2019 06 25T00:00:00 UPR United Nations A/HRC/42/10 Distr.: General 25 June 2019 General Assembly Original: English Human Rights Council Forty second session 9 27 September UHRIA/HRC/42/10https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/6458ae54-1c03-4362-9697-d5c504f5d28d
Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Democratic People’s Republic of Korea
United Nations A/HRC/42/10 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 June 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty second session 9 27 September 2019 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/42/10https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-democratic-peoples-republic-0
Sayadi and Vinck v. Belgium
Sayadi and Vinck v. Belgium CCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006 Communication number s : 1472/2006 Author: Nabil Sayadi and Patricia Vinck Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 94 Country Belgium Submission date 14 Mar 2006 Date of decision 22 Oct 2008 JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1472/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1477/en-US