Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1521 - 1540 of 1814
D.C. and D.E. v. Georgia
D.C. and D.E. v. Georgia CAT/C/60/D/573/2013 Communication number s : 573/2013 Author: D.C. and D.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Georgia Submission date 01 Jul 2013 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/60/D/573/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3428/en-US
D.R. v. Australia
D.R. v. Australia CRPD/C/17/D/14/2013 Communication number s : 014/2013 Author: Philip French Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 Country Australia Submission date 14 Aug 2013 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/14/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2387/en-US
D.V. v. Croatia
D.V. v. Croatia CCPR/C/122/D/2859/2016 Communication number s : 2859/2016 Author: D.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 122 Country Croatia Submission date 14 Jul 2016 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2859/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3278/en-US
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark
Dawas and Shava v. Denmark CERD/C/80/D/46/2009 Communication number s : 046/2009 Author: Mahali Dawas and Yousef Shava Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Denmark Submission date 16 Jun 2009 Date of decision 06 Mar 2012 Comment: JUTBCERD/C/80/D/46/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1727/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation LO and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees TCO v. Sweden Complaint No. 85/2012 SWE 06 02 000 06 04 000 19 04 000 03/07/2013 05/02/2014 European Committee of Social ESCcc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Roma and Travellers Forum (ERTF) v. Czech Republic , Complaint No.104/2014
Decision on the merits: European Roma and Travellers Forum ERTF v. Czech Republic Complaint No.104/2014 CZE 11 00 000 16 00 000 2016 05 17 2016 10 28 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 17 ESCcc-104-2014-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-104-2014-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights Leagues (FIDH) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 72/2011
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights Leagues FIDH v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 72/2011 GRC 11 01 000 11 02 000 11 03 000 23/01/2013 05/06/2013 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ESCcc-72-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-72-2011-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: Unione sindacale di base (USB) v. Italy, Complaint No. 170/2018
Decision on the merits: Unione sindacale di base USB v. Italy Complaint No. 170/2018 ITA 01 01 000 01 02 000 04 04 000 24 00 163 91 101 163 91 102 163 91 122 163 91 201 163 91 159 163 2022 01 26 2022 07 05 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-170-2018-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-170-2018-dmerits-en
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada
Deepan Budlakoti v. Canada CCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013 Communication number s : 2264/2013 Author: Deepan Budlakoti Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jul 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2264/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2479/en-US
Dermit Barbato v. Uruguay
Dermit Barbato v. Uruguay CCPR/C/17/D/84/1981 Communication number s : 084/1981 Author: Hugo Gilmet Dermit on behalf of his cousins Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 Country Uruguay Submission date 27 Feb 1981 Date of decision 21 Oct 1982 JUTBCCPR/C/17/D/84/1981https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/331/en-US
Doolan v. Australia
Doolan v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/18/2013 Communication number s : 18/2013 Author: Manuway Doolan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/18/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3135/en-US
Drescher Caldas v. Uruguay
Drescher Caldas v. Uruguay CCPR/C/19/D/43/1979 Communication number s : 043/1979 Author: Ivonne Ibarburu de Drescher alleged victim s wife Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 19 Country Uruguay Submission date 11 Jan 1979 Date of decision 21 JUTBCCPR/C/19/D/43/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/672/en-US
Dudko v. Australia
Dudko v. Australia CCPR/C/90/D/1347/2005 Communication number s : 1347/2005 Author: Lucy Dudko Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 90 Country Australia Submission date 01 Jun 2004 Date of decision 23 Jul 2007 Comment: Pursuant to rule 90 of JUTBCCPR/C/90/D/1347/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1368/en-US
E.W. et al. v. Netherlands
E.W. et al. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/47/D/429/1990 Communication number s : 429/1990 Author: E.W. et al. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 47 Country Netherlands Submission date 19 Nov 1990 Date of decision 08 Apr 1993 JUTBCCPR/C/47/D/429/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/603/en-US
European Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions concerning Custody of Children and on Restoration of Custody of Children (ETS No. 105)
European Convention on Recognition and Enforcement of Decisions concerning Custody of Children and on Restoration of Custody of Children ETS No. 105 105 Luxembourg 1980 05 20T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non COEETS No. 105https://rm.coe.int/1680078b09
Evaluation Report Ireland
Evaluation Report Ireland IRL 2022 06 17 2023 02 16 Adoption: 17 June 2022 Publication: 16 February 2023 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2020 2 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2020-2-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Ireland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2020-2-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Ireland-PUBLIC
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia
F.K.A.G. et al. v. Australia CCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011 Communication number s : 2094/2011 Author: F.K.A.G. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 108 Country Australia Submission date 28 Aug 2011 Date of decision 26 Jul 2013 Comment: The text JUTBCCPR/C/108/D/2094/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1673/en-US
F.K. v. Denmark
F.K. v. Denmark CAT/C/56/D/580/2014 Communication number s : 580/2014 Author: F.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Denmark Submission date 19 Dec 2013 Date of decision 23 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/56/D/580/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2074/en-US
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ALBANIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ALBANIA ALB 2014 03 28 2014 06 27 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-9E-Final-Albania-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-9E-Final-Albania-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ANDORRA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ANDORRA AND 2017 06 23 2017 11 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-8-eng-Final-Andorra-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-8-eng-Final-Andorra-PUBLIC