Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 12 of 12
A.M.M. v. Switzerland
A.M.M. v. Switzerland CERD/C/84/D/50/2012 Communication number s : 050/2012 Author: A.M.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 84 Country Switzerland Submission date 08 Jan 2012 Date of decision 18 Feb 2014 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/84/D/50/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1799/en-US
A.S. et al. v. Malta
A.S. et al. v. Malta CCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017 Communication number s : 3043/2017 Author: A.S. D.I. O.I. and G.D. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Malta Submission date 19 May 2017 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3043/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3300/en-US
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 5/25/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Violation of Article 8 Right to ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0525JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-210077
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY
CASE OF ILIAS AND AHMED v. HUNGARY 47287/15 POH RNOK B. HUN 11/21/2019 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection allowed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Six month period Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione materiae ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1121JUD004728715https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-198760
CASE OF KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS
CASE OF KYPRIANOU v. CYPRUS 73797/01 TRIANTAFYLLIDES M. CLERIDES C. EFSTATHIOU E. ANGELIDES A. VRAHIMI E. CLERIDES L. EMMERSON B. MULLER M. CYP 12/15/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 6 1 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 2 Not necessary to examine Art. 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:1215JUD007379701https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-71671
CASE OF ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY
CASE OF ORLANDI AND OTHERS v. ITALY 26431/12 26742/12 44057/12 60088/12 BILOTTA F. ROTELLI A. MOSCATI M.F. TORINO R. D AMICO M.E. CLARA M. PITEA C. RAGNI C. ITA 12/14/2017 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1214JUD002643112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179547
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF SMITH AND GRADY v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 33985/96 33986/96 N/A GBR 9/27/1999 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 8 No separate issue under Art. 14 8 No violation of Art. 3 or 14 3 Not necessary to examine Art. 10 or 14 10 Violation of Art. 13 Just ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1999:0927JUD003398596https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-58408
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM (No. 1)
CASE OF THE SUNDAY TIMES v. THE UNITED KINGDOM No. 1 6538/74 N/A GBR 4/26/1979 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 10 No violation of Art. 14 10 Not necessary to examine Art. 18 Just satisfaction reserved 149 148 201 316 265 379 343 100 232 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1979:0426JUD000653874https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57584
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/NZL/CO/2 3 NULL 2022 09 26T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/NZL/CO/2 3 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 26 September 2022 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of UHRICRPD/C/NZL/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/849cf8f3-328b-47bc-8b1f-5a81ed08def0
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US
W. G. D. v. Canada
W. G. D. v. Canada CAT/C/53/D/520/2012 Communication number s : 520/2012 Author: W. G. D. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 53 Country Canada Submission date 17 Aug 2012 Date of decision 26 Nov 2014 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/53/D/520/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2060/en-US