Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1661 - 1680 of 2220
OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE SALE OF CHILDREN, CHILD PROSTITUTION AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS : NICARAGUA
OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE SALE OF CHILDREN CHILD PROSTITUTION AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS : NICARAGUA CRC/C/OPSC/NIC/CO/1 NULL 2010 10 21T06:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/NIC/CO/1 UHRICRC/C/OPSC/NIC/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/53270279-b075-44cb-81b5-05797ff9e5c0
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
P.E.E.P. v. Estonia
P.E.E.P. v. Estonia CCPR/C/128/D/2682/2015 Communication number s : 2682/2015 Author: P.E.E.P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 128 Country Estonia Submission date 27 Mar 2013 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2682/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2865/en-US
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada
P.S.B. and T.K. v. Canada CAT/C/55/D/505/2012 Communication number s : 505/2012 Author: P.S.B. and T.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 55 Country Canada Submission date 08 Mar 2012 Date of decision 13 Aug 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/55/D/505/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1968/en-US
PARAGUAY: OPAC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PARAGUAY: OPAC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPAC/PRY/CO/1 NULL 2013 10 24T00:00:00 CRC OP AC United Nations CRC/C/OPAC/PRY/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 25 October 2013 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/OPAC/PRY/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ca0383e2-a724-4f99-b981-1bdaeb287697
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia
POGHOSYAN v. Armenia ARM 20/03/2012 00:00:00 24/10/2016 18:10:26 Case Description: This group of cases concerns various violations of the applicants right to liberty and security. In particular on account of: unlawful detention of the applicants for EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-365
POLAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
POLAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRPD/C/POL/CO/1 NULL 2018 10 29T00:00:00 CRPD United Nations CRPD/C/POL/CO/1 Convention on the Rights Distr.: General 29 October 2018 of Persons with Disabilities Original: English Committee on the Rights of Persons with UHRICRPD/C/POL/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/338f7de7-55cb-4fac-8be9-59d81d9f3884
POLAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
POLAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/POL/CO/5 6 NULL 2013 12 22T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/POL/CO/5 6 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 23 December 2013 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/POL/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3a22373a-3588-4de5-8bcd-f5c88b5b046e
POLAND: RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
POLAND: RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/POL/ROSP/1 NULL 2020 01 21T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/POL/ROSP/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 21 January 2020 and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/POL/ROSP/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4c52743e-0f90-41f8-9bf2-7d8d3d1d6bbc
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY
PORTUGAL: OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ADDRESSED TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/PRT/1 NULL 2019 07 03T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PRT/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General 3 July 2019 Convention against Torture and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/PRT/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d8a40c9d-dcf3-4f0c-9875-f48acd82fd28
Picq v. France
Picq v. France CCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007 Communication number s : 1632/2007 Author: Raymond Jacques Picq Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 94 Country France Submission date 28 May 2007 Date of decision 30 Oct 2008 Comment: Pursuant to rule JUTBCCPR/C/94/D/1632/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1023/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Pryce v. Jamaica
Pryce v. Jamaica CCPR/C/80/D/793/1998 Communication number s : 793/1998 Author: Errol Pryce Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 80 Country Jamaica Submission date 30 May 1997 Date of decision 15 Mar 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/80/D/793/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1030/en-US
Purna Maya v. Nepal
Purna Maya v. Nepal CCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013 Communication number s : 2245/2013 Author: Purna Maya Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Nepal Submission date Date of decision Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive issues: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2245/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2238/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
R.I. v. Ecuador
R.I. v. Ecuador CRPD/C/22/D/25/2014 Communication number s : 25/2014 Author: R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 22 Country Ecuador Submission date 18 Aug 2014 Date of decision 06 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/25/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3132/en-US
R.K.B. v. Türkiye
R.K.B. v. T rkiye CEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010 Communication number s : 028/2010 Author: R.K.B. represented by counsel Ozge Yildiz Arslan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 51 Country T rkiye Submission date 14 Jul 2009 Date of decision 24 Feb 2012 JUTBCEDAW/C/51/D/28/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1720/en-US
R.M. v. Jamaica
R.M. v. Jamaica CCPR/C/40/D/315/1988 Communication number s : 315/1988 Author: R.M. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 40 Country Jamaica Submission date 30 Jun 1988 Date of decision 26 Oct 1990 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/40/D/315/1988https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/426/en-US
Rékasi v. Hungary
R kasi v. Hungary CRPD/C/25/D/44/2017 Communication number s : 44/2017 Author: Magdolna R kasi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 25 Country Hungary Submission date 27 Jul 2017 Date of decision 06 Sep 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/25/D/44/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3064/en-US