Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 181 - 200 of 414
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
D.R. v. Australia
D.R. v. Australia CRPD/C/17/D/14/2013 Communication number s : 014/2013 Author: Philip French Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 Country Australia Submission date 14 Aug 2013 Date of decision 24 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/17/D/14/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2387/en-US
Da Silva Queiroz et al. v. Poland,Portugal
Da Silva Queiroz et al. v. Poland Portugal CCPR/C/84/D/969/2001 Communication number s : 969/2001 Author: Abel da Silva Queiroz et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 84 Country Poland Portugal Submission date 16 Apr 2000 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/84/D/969/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1189/en-US
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Decision on the merits; Confédération générale du travail (CGT) and Confédération française de l’encadrement-CGC (CFE-CGC) v. France, Complaint No. 149/2017
Decision on the merits Conf d ration g n rale du travail CGT and Conf d ration fran aise de l encadrement CGC CFE CGC v. France Complaint No. 149/2017 FRA 02 01 000 02 05 000 04 02 000 2021 05 19 2021 11 10 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ ESCcc-149-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-149-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No.148/2017
Decision on the merits:International Commission of Jurists ICJ v. Czech Republic Complaint No.148/2017 CZE 17 00 035 2020 10 20 2021 03 17 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 20 October ESCcc-148-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-148-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH) and Inclusion Europe v. Belgium: Complaint No. 141/2017
Decision on the merits: International Federation for Human Rights FIDH and Inclusion Europe v. Belgium: Complaint No. 141/2017 BEL 15 01 000 91 172 163 17 02 163 91 178 163 2020 09 09 2021 02 03 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-141-2017-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-141-2017-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights (FIDH) v. Belgium, Collective Complaint No. 75/2011
Decision on the merits: International Federation of Human Rights FIDH v. Belgium Collective Complaint No. 75/2011 BEL 13 00 000 14 00 000 15 00 000 16 00 000 14 01 000 13 03 000 15 03 163 30 00 163 91 168 163 91 171 163 91 175 163 91 169 163 91 166 163 91 ESCcc-75-2011-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-75-2011-dmerits-en
Eglė Kusaitė v. Lithuania
Egl Kusait v. Lithuania CCPR/C/126/D/2716/2016 Communication number s : 2716/2016 Author: Egl Kusait Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Lithuania Submission date 30 Oct 2015 Date of decision 24 Jul 2019 Comment: Individual opinion JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2716/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2782/en-US
Eugénie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eug nie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016 Communication number s : 2835/2016 Author: Eug nie Chakupewa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3232/en-US
F.B. et al. and D.A. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. and D.A. et al. v. France CRC/C/89/D/77/2019 CRC/C/89/D/79/2019 Communication number s : 109/2019 79/2019 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. and D.A. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 JUTBCRC/C/89/D/77/2019 - CRC/C/89/D/79/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3121/en-US
F.B. et al. v. France
F.B. et al. v. France CRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019 Communication number s : 77/2019 Author: F.B. et al. Type of decision: Admissibility decision Session No 86 Country France Submission date 01 Mar 2019 Date of decision 04 Feb 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRC/C/86/D/R.77/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3575/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LUXEMBOURG
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2018 06 22 2018 06 27 Adoption : 22 June 2018 Publication : 27 June 2018 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-5-Final-eng-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-5-Final-eng-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND, Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, Evaluation Report, Belgium
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies Evaluation Report Belgium BEL 2019 12 06 2020 01 23 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Publication: 23 January 2020 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT FINLAND
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT FINLAND FIN 2015 03 27 2015 04 01 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Finland to GRECOGreco-RC-IV-2015-4E-Final-Finland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-RC-IV-2015-4E-Final-Finland-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CZECH REPUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CZECH REPUBLIC CZE 2016 07 01 2016 11 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-4-eng-Final-CzechRep-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-4-eng-Final-CzechRep-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ITALY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ITALY ITA 2016 10 21 2017 01 19 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-2-en-Final-Italy-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-2-en-Final-Italy-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NETHERLANDS NLD 2013 06 21 2013 07 18 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-7E-Final-The-Netherlands-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT NORWAY NOR 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-10E-Final-Norway-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SLOVENIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT SLOVENIA SVN 2012 10 19 2013 05 30 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-1E-Final-Slovenia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2012-1E-Final-Slovenia-PUBLIC