Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 121 - 140 of 3975
Aung v. Canada
Aung v. Canada CAT/C/36/D/273/2005 Communication number s : 273/2005 Author: Thu Aung Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 36 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jul 2005 Date of decision 15 May 2006 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/36/D/273/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/117/en-US
Ayas v. Sweden
Ayas v. Sweden CAT/C/21/D/97/1997 Communication number s : 097/1997 Author: Orhan Ayas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 21 Country Sweden Submission date 12 Nov 1997 Date of decision 12 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/21/D/97/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/255/en-US
Aydos Sadykov v. Kazakhstan
Aydos Sadykov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/127/D/2431/2014 Communication number s : 2431/2014 Author: Aydos Sadykov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 08 Feb 2013 Date of decision 06 Nov 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2431/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2809/en-US
B.A. et al. v. Austria
B.A. et al. v. Austria CCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017 Communication number s : 2956/2017 Author: B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 127 Country Austria Submission date 08 Feb 2017 Date of decision 08 Nov 2019 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/2956/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2805/en-US
B.B. v. Sweden
B.B. v. Sweden CCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017 Communication number s : 3069/2017 Author: B.B. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 16 Mar 2021 Comment: Joint opinion of Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/3069/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3248/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada
B.D.K. et al. v. Canada CCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017 Communication number s : 3041/2017 Author: B.D.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Canada Submission date 07 Nov 2017 Date of decision 19 Mar 2019 Comment: Individual opinion of Jos JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/3041/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2916/en-US
B.H. v. Austria
B.H. v. Austria CCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011 Communication number s : 2088/2011 Author: B.H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 119 Country Austria Submission date 14 Feb 2005 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2088/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2257/en-US
B.K. v. Norway
B.K. v. Norway CAT/C/62/D/722/2015 Communication number s : 722/2015 Author: B.K. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Norway Submission date 21 Dec 2015 Date of decision 04 Dec 2017 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/62/D/722/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2414/en-US
B.K. v. Switzerland
B.K. v. Switzerland CAT/C/67/D/828/2017 Communication number s : 828/2017 Author: B.K. represented by counsel Ange Sankieme Lusanga Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Switzerland Submission date 05 Jun 2017 Date of decision JUTBCAT/C/67/D/828/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2679/en-US
B.L. (represented by Balmain for Refugees) v. Australia
B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011 Communication number s : 2053/2011 Author: B.L. represented by Balmain for Refugees Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia Submission date 15 Apr JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2053/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1905/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B.M.S. v. Sweden
B.M.S. v. Sweden CAT/C/56/D/594/2014 Communication number s : 594/2014 Author: B.M.S. not represented by counsel Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Sweden Submission date 09 Feb 2014 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: Non JUTBCAT/C/56/D/594/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2079/en-US
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden
B.N.T.K. v. Sweden CAT/C/64/D/641/2014 Communication number s : 641/2014 Author: B.N.T.K. represented by counsel Mai Greitz Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Sweden Submission date 01 Dec 2014 Date of decision 09 Aug 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/64/D/641/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2456/en-US
B.S.S. v. Canada
B.S.S. v. Canada CAT/C/32/D/183/2001 Communication number s : 183/2001 Author: B.S.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Canada Submission date 07 Mar 2001 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/183/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/149/en-US
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada
B.S. and N.K. v. Canada CAT/C/71/D/798/2017 Communication number s : 798/2017 Author: B.S. and N.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Canada Submission date 13 Jan 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: Individual JUTBCAT/C/71/D/798/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3425/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania
BEIZARAS AND LEVICKAS v. Lithuania LTU 14/05/2020 00:00:00 12/06/2020 16:56:20 Case Description: This case concerns the refusal of the law enforcement agencies due to their discriminatory attitudes to launch an investigation into the applicants EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55375
BELLER v. Poland
BELLER v. Poland POL 06/06/2005 00:00:00 06/11/2016 17:10:55 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the excessive length of proceedings before administrative courts and bodies violations of Article 6 1 . The case of Wcis o and Cabaj also concerns EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-17662
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
BENIN : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/BEN/3 NULL 2018 10 01T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/BEN/3 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 1 October 2018 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/BEN/3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4f5f2925-7602-430e-8b53-d01b5cd06b4d