Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 158
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
Alarcón Flores et al v. Ecuador
Alarc n Flores et al v. Ecuador E/C.12/62/D/14/2016 Communication number s : 014/2016 Author: Ana Esther Alarc n Flores et al Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 62 Country Ecuador Submission date 05 Mar 2015 Date of decision 04 Oct 2017 JUTBE/C.12/62/D/14/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2410/en-US
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BABAR AHMAD AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 24027/07 11949/08 36742/08 66911/09 67354/09 PEIRCE G. COOPER B. ARANI M. JONES A. BRANDON B. RAJA A. JONES J. GBR 4/10/2012 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0410JUD002402707https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110267
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 6/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 1 Access to court Civil rights and obligations Determination civil Violation of Article 10 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0623JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-163113
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY
CASE OF BAKA v. HUNGARY 20261/12 CECH A. HUN 5/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione materiae Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Civil proceedings Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0527JUD002026112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-144139
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF GARIB v. THE NETHERLANDS 43494/09 WIJLING R.S. NLD 11/6/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 2 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom of movement general Article 2 para. 1 of Protocol No. 4 Freedom to choose residence Sections 5 2 6 2 7 1 b and 17 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1106JUD004349409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-177406
CASE OF GUÐMUNDUR ANDRI ÁSTRÁÐSSON v. ICELAND
CASE OF GU MUNDUR ANDRI STR SSON v. ICELAND 26374/18 VILHJ LMSSON V.H. ISL 12/1/2020 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Tribunal established by law Non pecuniary damage finding of violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2020:1201JUD002637418https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-206582
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJEČNIČKI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA
CASE OF HRVATSKI LIJE NI KI SINDIKAT v. CROATIA 36701/09 POSAVEC S. HRV 11/27/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Locus standi Violation of Article 11 Freedom of assembly and association Article 11 1 Freedom of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:1127JUD003670109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-148181
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA
CASE OF KHAMTOKHU AND AKSENCHIK v. RUSSIA 60367/08 961/11 YERMOLAYEVA N. MARALYAN A. DAVIDYAN E. MOSKALENKO K. RUS 1/24/2017 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 5 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 5 Right to liberty and ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0124JUD006036708https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170663
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF LOPES DE SOUSA FERNANDES v. PORTUGAL 56080/13 S FERNANDES R. PRT 12/19/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1219JUD005608013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-179556
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA
CASE OF MOCANU AND OTHERS v. ROMANIA 10865/09 45886/07 32431/08 POPESCU A. SFIRAIALA I. MATEI I. NACEA D. HARTNEANU D.O. ROU 9/17/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Six month period Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0917JUD001086509https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146540
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF TAUTKUS v. LITHUANIA 29474/09 KUKAITIS M. LTU 11/27/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Procedural aspect Code of Correctional Works Internal Regulations of Correctional Institutions 293 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1127JUD002947409https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-114770
Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Ecuador
Concluding observations of the Committee on the Elimination of Discrimination against Women: Ecuador CEDAW/C/ECU/CO/7 NULL 2008 11 21T06:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/ECU/CO/7 Distr.: General 7 November 2008 Convention on the Elimination of All Forms UHRICEDAW/C/ECU/CO/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/31ad6a1e-0e92-4e91-8fc9-6848b26b0b1b
Council holds Panel on the Contribution of Parliaments to the work of the Council and its Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council MORNING 29 May 2013 The Human Rights Council this morning held a panel discussion on the contribution of parliaments to the work of the Human Rights Council and its Universal Periodic Review. Luis Gallegos Chiriboga Vice President of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/05/council-holds-panel-contribution-parliaments-work-council-and-its-universal
Deisl v. Austria
Deisl v. Austria CCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002 Communication number s : 1060/2002 Author: Franz and Maria Deisl Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 81 Country Austria Submission date 17 Sep 2001 Date of decision 27 Jul 2004 Comment: The authors asked JUTBCCPR/C/81/D/1060/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1128/en-US
ECUADOR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ECUADOR: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS E/C.12/ECU/CO/4 NULL 2019 11 14T00:00:00 CESCR United Nations E/C.12/ECU/CO/4 Economic and Social Council Distr.: General 14 November 2019 English Original: Spanish Committee on Economic Social and Cultural Rights UHRIE/C.12/ECU/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/38ae37b1-7ea0-4c10-b9cf-612d23256333
Fals Borda et al. v. Colombia
Fals Borda et al. v. Colombia CCPR/C/16/D/46/1979 Communication number s : 046/1979 Author: Orlando Fals Borda Maria Cristina Salazar de Fals Borda Justo German Bermudez Martha Isabel Valderrama Becerra Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 16 JUTBCCPR/C/16/D/46/1979https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/445/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bahrain, Ecuador and Tunisia
Human Rights CouncilMORNING AND MIDDAY 19 September 2012Concludes Interactive Dialogue with Human Rights Council Advisory Committee and Starts Debate on Human Rights Bodies and MechanismsThe Human Rights Council today adopted the outcome of the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bahrain
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the Netherlands and South Africa
Human Rights Council MORNING 21 September 2012 Hears Address by Foreign Minister of Australia and Human Rights Minister of Burkina Faso Continues Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-netherlands