Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 561 - 580 of 1522
Conclusions XXII-1 - United Kingdom - Article 1-2
Conclusions XXII 1 United Kingdom Article 1 2 GBR 01 02 000 29/01/2021 02/02/2021 Article 1 Right to work Paragraph 2 Freely undertaken work non discrimination prohibition of forced labour other aspects The Committee takes note of the information ESCXXII-1/def/GBR/1/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-1/def/GBR/1/2/EN
Conclusions XXII-3 - Germany - Article 2-2
Conclusions XXII 3 Germany Article 2 2 DEU 02 02 000 20/01/2023 01/03/2023 Article 2 Right to just conditions of work Paragraph 2 Public holidays with pay The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Germany and in the ESCXXII-3/def/DEU/2/2/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-3/def/DEU/2/2/EN
Conclusions XXII-3 - Spain - Article 4-1
Conclusions XXII 3 Spain Article 4 1 ESP 04 01 000 20/01/2023 02/02/2023 Article 4 Right to a fair remuneration Paragraph 1 Decent remuneration The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Spain and the comments from ESCXXII-3/def/ESP/4/1/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-3/def/ESP/4/1/EN
Conclusions XXII-3 - Spain - Article 6-3
Conclusions XXII 3 Spain Article 6 3 ESP 06 03 000 20/01/2023 02/02/2023 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 3 Conciliation and arbitration The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Spain and of the ESCXXII-3/def/ESP/6/3/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-3/def/ESP/6/3/EN
Conclusions XXII-3 - Spain - Article 6-4
Conclusions XXII 3 Spain Article 6 4 ESP 06 04 000 20/01/2023 02/03/2023 Article 6 Right to bargain collectively Paragraph 4 Collective action The Committee takes note of the information contained in the report submitted by Spain and of the comments from ESCXXII-3/def/ESP/6/4/ENhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=XXII-3/def/ESP/6/4/EN
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (ETS No. 005)
Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ETS No. 005 005 Rome 1950 11 04T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States of the Council of Europe and for accession by the European Union Rome 1953 09 03T00:00:00 10 COEETS No. 005https://rm.coe.int/1680a2353d
Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data (ETS No. 108)
Convention for the Protection of Individuals with regard to Automatic Processing of Personal Data ETS No. 108 108 Strasbourg 1981 01 28T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and for accession by non member States Strasbourg 1985 10 COEETS No. 108https://rm.coe.int/1680078b37
Convention on Cybercrime (ETS No. 185)
Convention on Cybercrime ETS No. 185 185 Budapest 2001 11 23T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States and the non member States which have participated in its elaboration and for accession by other non member States Budapest 2004 07 COEETS No. 185https://rm.coe.int/1680081561
Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region (ETS No. 165)
Convention on the Recognition of Qualifications concerning Higher Education in the European Region ETS No. 165 165 Lisbon 1997 04 11T00:00:00 Special conditions of opening for signature Lisbon 1999 02 01T00:00:00 5 Ratifications including 3 member States COEETS No. 165https://rm.coe.int/168007f2c7
Cosme Ignacio Marino Demonte v. Argentina
Cosme Ignacio Marino Demonte v. Argentina CCPR/C/123/D/2424/2014 Communication number s : 2424/2014 Author: Cosme Ignacio Marino Demonte Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Argentina Submission date 05 Aug 2013 Date of decision 25 JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2424/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2543/en-US
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Council holds Panel on the Contribution of Parliaments to the work of the Council and its Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council MORNING 29 May 2013 The Human Rights Council this morning held a panel discussion on the contribution of parliaments to the work of the Human Rights Council and its Universal Periodic Review. Luis Gallegos Chiriboga Vice President of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2013/05/council-holds-panel-contribution-parliaments-work-council-and-its-universal
Council holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concludes the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON17 March 2017The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concluded the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms. In the general debate on the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review-and-concludes-general
DAUTI v. Albania
DAUTI v. Albania ALB 03/05/2009 00:00:00 24/10/2016 17:59:35 Case Description: Access to and efficient functioning of justice: Denial of access to court in proceedings challenging administrative decisions relating to the award of invalidity benefits in EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-335
DMITRIJEVS v. Latvia
DMITRIJEVS v. Latvia LVA 16/03/2015 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:30:55 Case Description: Effective remedy: National courts failure to award a convict compensation for the period in which he had unlawfully served his sentence under a stricter prison regime than EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-12684
DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey
DOGAN AND OTHERS v. Turkey TUR 10/11/2004 00:00:00 28/10/2016 15:13:12 Case Description: Protection of property of home and lack of a remedy: Disproportionate interference due to the denial of access to the applicants property in South East Turkey on EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-5572
David Hicks v. Australia
David Hicks v. Australia CCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010 Communication number s : 2005/2010 Author: David Hicks Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Australia Submission date 20 Sep 2010 Date of decision 05 Nov 2015 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2005/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2084/en-US
Decision on the merits: Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace v. Italy, Complaint No. 102/2013
Decision on the merits: Associazione Nazionale Giudici di Pace v. Italy Complaint No. 102/2013 ITA 91 162 163 91 159 163 2016 07 05 2016 11 16 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE MERITS Adoption: 5 July ESCcc-102-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-102-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions (CESP) v. France, Complaint No. 101/2013
Decision on the merits: European Council of Police Trade Unions CESP v. France Complaint No. 101/2013 FRA 05 00 000 06 00 000 06 01 000 06 02 000 2016 01 27 2016 07 04 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des Droits sociaux DECISION ON THE ESCcc-101-2013-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-101-2013-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: European Roma Rights Centre (ERRC) v. France, Collective Complaint No. 51/2008
Decision on the merits: European Roma Rights Centre ERRC v. France Collective Complaint No. 51/2008 FRA 16 00 000 19 04 000 30 00 163 31 00 163 31 02 163 91 175 163 91 188 163 91 212 163 91 213 163 19/10/2009 27/02/2010 European Committee of Social Rights ESCcc-51-2008-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-51-2008-dmerits-en