Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 1168
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.S. v. Canada
B.S. v. Canada CAT/C/27/D/166/2000 Communication number s : 166/2000 Author: B.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Canada Submission date 22 Apr 1999 Date of decision 14 Nov 2001 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCAT/C/27/D/166/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/178/en-US
BURKINA FASO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BURKINA FASO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BFA/CO/2 NULL 2019 12 18T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BFA/CO/2 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 18 December 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman English or Degrading Treatment Original: French or UHRICAT/C/BFA/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/55887fbb-df8f-4b63-bc5c-84f53466e889
Bakytgul Suleymenova v. Kazakhstan
Bakytgul Suleymenova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/126/D/2416/2014 Communication number s : 2416/2014 Author: Bakytgul Suleymenova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 126 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 10 May 2014 Date of decision 17 Jul 2019 JUTBCCPR/C/126/D/2416/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2787/en-US
Barrero Lozano v. Sweden
Barrero Lozano v. Sweden CCPR/C/67/D/748/1997 Communication number s : 748/1997 Author: Luis Fabio Barrero Lozano Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 67 Country Sweden Submission date 04 Jun 1996 Date of decision 18 Oct 1999 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/67/D/748/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/864/en-US
Baumgarten v. Germany
Baumgarten v. Germany CCPR/C/78/D/960/2000 Communication number s : 960/2000 Author: Klaus Dieter Baumgarten Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 78 Country Germany Submission date 30 Sep 1998 Date of decision 31 Jul 2003 Comment: The Covenant JUTBCCPR/C/78/D/960/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1061/en-US
Ben Salem v. Tunisia
Ben Salem v. Tunisia CAT/C/39/D/269/2005 Communication number s : 269/2005 Author: Ali Ben Salem Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Tunisia Submission date 02 May 2005 Date of decision 07 Nov 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/39/D/269/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/87/en-US
Brinkhof v. Netherlands
Brinkhof v. Netherlands CCPR/C/48/D/402/1990 Communication number s : 402/1990 Author: Henricus Antonius Godefriedus Maria Brinkhof Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Netherlands Submission date 11 Apr 1990 Date of decision 27 Jul JUTBCCPR/C/48/D/402/1990https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/504/en-US
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia
Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010 Communication number s : 1968/2010 Author: Bronson Blessington and Matthew Elliot represented by Human Rights Law Centre Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1968/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1890/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY
CASE OF A AND B v. NORWAY 24130/11 29758/11 KJELDAHL R. NOR 11/15/2016 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice general Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 Right not to be tried or punished twice Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1115JUD002413011https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-168972
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF A, B AND C v. IRELAND
CASE OF A B AND C v. IRELAND 25579/05 KAY J. IRL 12/16/2010 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible No violation of Art. 8 Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:1216JUD002557905https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-102332
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
CASE OF A.H. AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA 6033/13 8927/13 10549/13 12275/13 23890/13 26309/13 27161/13 29197/13 32224/13 32331/13 32351/13 32368/13 37173/13 38490/13 42340/13 42403/13 INTERNATIONAL PROTECTION CENTRE IN MOSCOW O REAR I. RUS 1/17/2017 12:00:00 AM ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:0117JUD000603313https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-170390
CASE OF A. v. FRANCE
CASE OF A. v. FRANCE 14838/89 N/A FRA 11/23/1993 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection rejected out of time Preliminary objection rejected non exhaustion Violation of Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Costs and expenses partial award ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:1993:1123JUD001483889https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-57848
CASE OF ABASHEV v. RUSSIA
CASE OF ABASHEV v. RUSSIA 9096/09 N/A RUS 6/27/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 5 Compensation Non pecuniary damage award Art. 133 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure Art. 1070 of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0627JUD000909609https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-121564
CASE OF ABDULLA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF ABDULLA ALI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 30971/12 PIERCE G. GBR 6/30/2015 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing 445 76 136 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003097112 FOURTH SECTION ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0630JUD003097112https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-155715
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND
CASE OF ADVANCE PHARMA SP. Z O.O v. POLAND 1469/20 G SIOROWSKA M. METELSKA J. POL 2/3/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 6 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0203JUD000146920https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-215388