Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 3056
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
A.L. v. Russian Federation
A.L. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/132/D/3038/2017 Communication number s : 3038/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Russian Federation Submission date 14 Feb 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3038/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3175/en-US
A.N. v. Switzerland
A.N. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/742/2016 Communication number s : 742/2016 Author: A.N. represented by counsel Centre Suisse pour la D fense des Droits des Migrants Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2447/en-US
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.R.I. v. Denmark
A.R.I. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015 Communication number s : 096/2015 Author: A.R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2652/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
AKBAY AND OTHERS v. Germany
AKBAY AND OTHERS v. Germany DEU 15/01/2021 00:00:00 15/03/2021 16:05:41 Case Description: This case concerns a violation of the right to a fair trial of the first applicant s deceased husband and the second applicant due to their conviction to prison EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-56931
ALBANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALBANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CED/C/ALB/CO/1 NULL 2018 07 03T00:00:00 CED United Nations CED/C/ALB/CO/1 Distr.: General International Convention for the Protection of All Persons 3 July 2018 from Enforced Disappearance Original: English Committee on UHRICED/C/ALB/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5e2915c9-9987-4e07-b60f-2e7263b4d294
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
ASSOCIATION '21 DECEMBRE 1989' AND OTHERS v. Romania
ASSOCIATION 21 DECEMBRE 1989 AND OTHERS v. Romania ROU 28/11/2011 00:00:00 03/11/2016 17:43:49 Case Description: These cases mainly 1 concern the criminal investigations carried out since the early 1990s into violent crackdowns on anti governmental EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-13065
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/AUT/CO/5 NULL 2015 12 02T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Austria 1.The Committee considered the fifth periodic report submitted by Austria CCPR/C/AUT/5 at its 3206th and 3207th UHRICCPR/C/AUT/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ff8dec33-597b-430d-9033-c77c2cde92b6
Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism (CETS No. 217)
Additional Protocol to the Council of Europe Convention on the Prevention of Terrorism CETS No. 217 217 Riga 2015 10 22T12:21:04.1 Treaty open for signature by the Signatories to Treaty CETS 196 and for accession by the non member States which have COECETS No. 217https://rm.coe.int/168047c5ea
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US