Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 781 - 800 of 1531
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
P.K. v. Canada
P.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1234/2003 Communication number s : 1234/2003 Author: P.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 05 Dec 2003 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: On 5 December 2003 Canada was JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1234/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1346/en-US
PERU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PERU: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/PER/CO/7 NULL 2018 12 18T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/PER/CO/7 Distr.: General Convention against Tortureand Other Cruel Inhumanor 18 December 2018 Degrading Treatmentor Punishment English Original: Spanish UHRICAT/C/PER/CO/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/c22047ac-2693-4d40-af19-0c0d14419260
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/PRT/CO/7 NULL 2019 12 18T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/PRT/CO/7 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 18 December 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/PRT/CO/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2d6c6fcd-4ba3-498d-8285-84d30e7d5649
Parra Corral v. Spain
Parra Corral v. Spain CCPR/C/83/D/1356/2005 Communication number s : 1356/2005 Author: Antonio Parra Corral Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Spain Submission date 12 Dec 2004 Date of decision 29 Mar 2005 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/1356/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1145/en-US
Pavel Levinov v. Belarus
Pavel Levinov v. Belarus CCPR/C/102/D/1812/2008 Communication number s : 1812/2008 Author: Pavel Levinov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Belarus Submission date 31 Mar 2008 Date of decision 26 Jul 2011 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1812/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1643/en-US
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay CCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009 Communication number s : 1887/2009 Author: Juan Peirano Basso Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uruguay Submission date 05 May 2009 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1604/en-US
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/76/D/757/1997 Communication number s : 757/1997 Author: Alzbeta Pezoldova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Sep 1996 Date of decision 25 Oct 2002 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/757/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1025/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Postnov v. Belarus
Postnov v. Belarus CCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014 Communication number s : 2361/2014 Author: Igor Postnov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Belarus Submission date 22 Feb 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2361/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3108/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/66/D/33/2003 Communication number s : 033/2003 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Dec 2003 Date of decision 09 Mar 2005 Comment: See also Communication JUTBCERD/C/66/D/33/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1739/en-US
Quereshi v. Denmark
Quereshi v. Denmark CERD/C/63/D/27/2002 Communication number s : 027/2002 Author: Kamal Quereshi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Denmark Submission date 23 Oct 2002 Date of decision 19 Aug 2003 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/63/D/27/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1742/en-US
R.D. et al. v. Switzerland
R.D. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/57/D/558/2013 Communication number s : 558/2013 Author: R.D. et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Switzerland Submission date 23 Aug 2013 Date of decision 13 May 2016 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/57/D/558/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3009/en-US
R.E.I. v. Netherlands
R.E.I. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017 Communication number s : 3015/2017 Author: R.E.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 136 Country Netherlands Submission date 22 May 2017 Date of decision 04 Nov 2022 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3015/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3546/en-US
R.P.B. v. Philippines
R.P.B. v. Philippines CEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011 Communication number s : 034/2011 Author: R.P.B. represented by counsel Evalyn G. Ursua and Maria Karla L. Espinosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 57 Country Philippines Submission date 23 May JUTBCEDAW/C/57/D/34/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1875/en-US
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES: ADDENDUM: PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE MISSION TO COLOMBIA
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES: ADDENDUM: PRELIMINARY NOTE ON THE MISSION TO COLOMBIA A/HRC/13/23/Add.3 NULL 2010 03 14T06:00:00 SR Minorities United Nations A/HRC/13/23/Add.3 Distr.: General 15 March 2010 General Assembly English UHRIA/HRC/13/23/Add.3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/a2e861c4-73e1-4f26-ad54-28e966a5406b
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES, GAY MCDOUGALL : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO COLOMBIA
REPORT OF THE INDEPENDENT EXPERT ON MINORITY ISSUES GAY MCDOUGALL : ADDENDUM: MISSION TO COLOMBIA A/HRC/16/45/Add.1 NULL 2011 01 25T06:00:00 SR Minorities United Nations A/HRC/16/45/Add.1 Distr.: General 25 January 2011 General Assembly Original: English UHRIA/HRC/16/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3f97359b-7662-4c50-8665-1475f2bbdb8f