Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 381 - 400 of 1015
Decision on the merits: Marangopoulos Foundation for Human Rights (MFHR) v. Greece, Collective Complaint No. 30/2005
Decision on the merits: Marangopoulos Foundation for Human Rights MFHR v. Greece Collective Complaint No. 30/2005 GRC 02 04 163 03 01 163 03 02 000 11 01 000 11 02 000 11 03 000 06/12/2006 07/06/2007 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-30-2005-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-30-2005-dmerits-en
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe (UWE) v. Ireland, Complaint No. 132/2016
Decision on the merits: University Women of Europe UWE v. Ireland Complaint No. 132/2016 IRL 01 00 000 04 00 000 04 03 000 20 00 000 91 100 163 91 118 163 91 121 163 91 197 163 2019 12 05 2020 06 29 European Committee of Social Rights Comit europ en des ESCcc-132-2016-dmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-132-2016-dmerits-en
Doolan v. Australia
Doolan v. Australia CRPD/C/22/D/18/2013 Communication number s : 18/2013 Author: Manuway Doolan Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Australia Submission date 19 Sep 2013 Date of decision 30 Aug 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/18/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3135/en-US
E.B. v. Romania
E.B. v. Romania ROU 19/03/2019 00:00:00 22/03/2019 11:35:38 Case Description: The case concerns a breach of the State s positive obligation effectively to apply a criminal law system punishing non consensual sexual acts in particular when the victims are EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-51763
E.I.F. v. Netherlands
E.I.F. v. Netherlands CERD/C/58/D/15/1999 Communication number s : 015/1999 Author: E.I.F. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Netherlands Submission date 04 May 1998 Date of decision 21 Mar 2001 Comment: This document has no JUTBCERD/C/58/D/15/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1746/en-US
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden
El Khalek Attia v. Sweden CAT/C/31/D/199/2002 Communication number s : 199/2002 Author: Hanan Ahmed Fouad Abd El Khalek Attia Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 31 Country Sweden Submission date 28 Dec 2001 Date of decision 17 Nov 2003 JUTBCAT/C/31/D/199/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/156/en-US
Eugénie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo
Eug nie Chakupewa et al. v. Democratic Republic of the Congo CCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016 Communication number s : 2835/2016 Author: Eug nie Chakupewa et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Democratic Republic of the Congo Submission JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2835/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3232/en-US
Evaluation Report Austria
Evaluation Report Austria AUT 2022 12 02 2023 03 01 Adoption: 2 December 2022 Publication: 1 March 2023 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2022 1 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2022-1-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Austria-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2022-1-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Austria-PUBLIC
Evaluation Report Ireland
Evaluation Report Ireland IRL 2022 06 17 2023 02 16 Adoption: 17 June 2022 Publication: 16 February 2023 Public GrecoEval5Rep 2020 2 FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2020-2-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Ireland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2020-2-Final-eng-EvaluationReport-Ireland-PUBLIC
F.A. v. Russian Federation
F.A. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/123/D/2189/2012 Communication number s : 2189/2012 Author: F.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country Russian Federation Submission date 09 Aug 2012 Date of decision 27 Jul 2018 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2189/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2539/en-US
F.H.A. v. Denmark
F.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016 Communication number s : 108/2016 Author: F.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 75 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 17 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/75/D/108/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2704/en-US
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LUXEMBOURG
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies EVALUATION REPORT LUXEMBOURG LUX 2018 06 22 2018 06 27 Adoption : 22 June 2018 Publication : 27 June 2018 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep-2017-5-Final-eng-Luxembourg-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep-2017-5-Final-eng-Luxembourg-PUBLIC
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND, Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies, Evaluation Report, Belgium
FIFTH EVALUATION ROUND Preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments top executive functions and law enforcement agencies Evaluation Report Belgium BEL 2019 12 06 2020 01 23 Adoption: 6 December 2019 Publication: 23 January 2020 GRECOGrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval5Rep(2019)3-FINAL-eng-Belgium-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT SPAIN
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors COMPLIANCE REPORT SPAIN ESP 2016 07 01 2016 10 10 I. INTRODUCTION The Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the authorities of Spain to GRECOGrecoRC4-2016-1-eng-Final-Spain-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2016-1-eng-Final-Spain-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ARMENIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT ARMENIA ARM 2015 10 16 2016 02 25 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-1E-Final-Armenia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2015-1E-Final-Armenia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT AUSTRIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT AUSTRIA AUT 2016 10 21 2017 02 13 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-1-en-Final-Austria-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-1-en-Final-Austria-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT AZERBAIJAN
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT AZERBAIJAN AZE 2014 10 10 2015 04 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-2E-Final-Azerbaijan-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2014-2E-Final-Azerbaijan-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT BELGIUM
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT BELGIUM BEL 2014 03 28 2014 03 28 0 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-8E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-8E-Final-Belgium-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CROATIA
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CROATIA HRV 2014 06 20 2014 06 25 / TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. CORRUPTION GRECOGreco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-7E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=Greco-Eval-IV-Rep-2013-7E-Final-Croatia-PUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CZECH REPUBLIC
FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament judges and prosecutors EVALUATION REPORT CZECH REPUBLIC CZE 2016 07 01 2016 11 02 TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I. INTRODUCTION AND METHODOLOGY II. CONTEXT III. GRECOGrecoEval4Rep-2016-4-eng-Final-CzechRep-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoEval4Rep-2016-4-eng-Final-CzechRep-PUBLIC