Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 3222
A/HRC/47/12: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Austria
United Nations A/HRC/47/12 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/12https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4712-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-austria
A/HRC/47/13: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Myanmar
United Nations A/HRC/47/13 General Assembly Distr.: General 12 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/13https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4713-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-myanmar
A/HRC/47/14: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Rwanda
United Nations A/HRC/47/14 General Assembly Distr.: General 25 March 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review UPRA/HRC/47/14https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc4714-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-rwanda
A/HRC/47/6: Report of the Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review - Mauritania
United Nations A/HRC/47/6 General Assembly Distr.: General 9 April 2021 English Original: English/French Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda item 6 Universal periodic review Report of the Working Group on the Universal UPRA/HRC/47/6https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/ahrc476-report-working-group-universal-periodic-review-mauritania
A.K. v. Australia
A.K. v. Australia CAT/C/32/D/148/1999 Communication number s : 148/1999 Author: A.K. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 32 Country Australia Submission date 13 Oct 1999 Date of decision 05 May 2004 Comment: Under rule 108 9 the State party JUTBCAT/C/32/D/148/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/152/en-US
A.L. v. Russian Federation
A.L. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/132/D/3038/2017 Communication number s : 3038/2017 Author: A.L. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 132 Country Russian Federation Submission date 14 Feb 2017 Date of decision 23 Jul 2021 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/3038/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3175/en-US
A.N. v. Switzerland
A.N. v. Switzerland CAT/C/64/D/742/2016 Communication number s : 742/2016 Author: A.N. represented by counsel Centre Suisse pour la D fense des Droits des Migrants Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Switzerland Submission date 12 JUTBCAT/C/64/D/742/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2447/en-US
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.R.I. v. Denmark
A.R.I. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015 Communication number s : 096/2015 Author: A.R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2652/en-US
A.R.U. v. Netherlands
A.R.U. v. Netherlands CCPR/C/49/D/509/1992 Communication number s : 509/1992 Author: A.R.U. name deleted Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 49 Country Netherlands Submission date 21 Apr 1992 Date of decision 19 Oct 1993 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/49/D/509/1992https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/393/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2014 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: Substantive JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2425/en-US
A.S. v. Denmark
A.S. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015 Communication number s : 080/2015 Author: A.S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Denmark Submission date 28 Jan 2015 Date of decision 26 Feb 2018 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/69/D/80/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2636/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
A v. New Zealand
A v. New Zealand CCPR/C/66/D/754/1997 Communication number s : 754/1997 Author: A Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 66 Country New Zealand Submission date 19 Apr 1996 Date of decision 15 Jul 1999 Comment: Individual opinion submitted by JUTBCCPR/C/66/D/754/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/802/en-US
ALBANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
ALBANIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CED/C/ALB/CO/1 NULL 2018 07 03T00:00:00 CED United Nations CED/C/ALB/CO/1 Distr.: General International Convention for the Protection of All Persons 3 July 2018 from Enforced Disappearance Original: English Committee on UHRICED/C/ALB/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5e2915c9-9987-4e07-b60f-2e7263b4d294
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/AUT/CO/5 NULL 2015 12 02T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Austria 1.The Committee considered the fifth periodic report submitted by Austria CCPR/C/AUT/5 at its 3206th and 3207th UHRICCPR/C/AUT/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ff8dec33-597b-430d-9033-c77c2cde92b6
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan
Abdurasulov et al. v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018 3207/2018 Communication number s : 3201/2018 3202/2018 3203/2018 3204/2018 3205/2018 3206/2018 3207/2018 3200/2018 Author: Mukhamadrasul Abdurasulov Osmonali Otamirzaev Bakhodir Zhalalov Abdurashit JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/3200/2018-3207/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3645/en-US