Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 21 - 40 of 2540
A.P. v. Finland
A.P. v. Finland CAT/C/60/D/465/2011 Communication number s : 465/2011 Author: A.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Finland Submission date 14 Apr 2011 Date of decision 10 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/465/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3432/en-US
A. P. v. Ukraine
A. P. v. Ukraine CCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008 Communication number s : 1834/2008 Author: A. P. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 105 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Nov 2007 Date of decision 23 Jul 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/105/D/1834/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1537/en-US
A.R.I. v. Denmark
A.R.I. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015 Communication number s : 096/2015 Author: A.R.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 71 Country Denmark Submission date 17 Sep 2015 Date of decision 25 Feb 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/72/D/96/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2652/en-US
A. S. v. Russian Federation
A. S. v. Russian Federation CERD/C/79/D/45/2009 Communication number s : 045/2009 Author: A. S. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 79 Country Russian Federation Submission date 20 Aug 2009 Date of decision 26 Aug 2011 Comment: This JUTBCERD/C/79/D/45/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1726/en-US
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey
ALTUG TANER AKCAM v. Turkey TUR 25/01/2012 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:45:20 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37188
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey
ARTUN AND GUVENER v. Turkey TUR 26/09/2007 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:22:51 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37417
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
AUSTRIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/AUT/CO/5 NULL 2015 12 02T00:00:00 CCPR Concluding observations on the fifth periodic report of Austria 1.The Committee considered the fifth periodic report submitted by Austria CCPR/C/AUT/5 at its 3206th and 3207th UHRICCPR/C/AUT/CO/5https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ff8dec33-597b-430d-9033-c77c2cde92b6
Abildayeva v. Kazakhstan
Abildayeva v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/125/D/2309/2013 Communication number s : 2309/2013 Author: Anar Abildayeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 125 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 05 Jul 2013 Date of decision 29 Mar 2019 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/125/D/2309/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3099/en-US
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Switzerland
Addendum to the Second Compliance Report Switzerland CHE 2022 12 02 2023 05 11 I. INTRODUCTION The Addendum to the Second Compliance Report assesses the measures taken by the Swiss authorities to implement the pending recommendations issued in the Fourth GRECOGrecoRC4-2022-23-Final-eng-Addtothe2ndComplianceReport-Switzerland-PUBLIChttps://hudoc.greco.coe.int/eng?i=GrecoRC4-2022-23-Final-eng-Addtothe2ndComplianceReport-Switzerland-PUBLIC
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan
Adelaida Kim v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012 Communication number s : 2175/2012 Author: Adelaida Kim Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 05 Feb 2009 Date of decision 04 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2175/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2483/en-US
Agiza v. Sweden
Agiza v. Sweden CAT/C/34/D/233/2003 Communication number s : 233/2003 Author: Ahmed Hussein Mustafa Kamil Agiza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Sweden Submission date 25 Jun 2003 Date of decision 20 May 2005 Comment: Decision on JUTBCAT/C/34/D/233/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/140/en-US
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland
Amanda Jane Mellet v. Ireland CCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013 Communication number s : 2324/2013 Author: Amanda Jane Mellet Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 116 Country Ireland Submission date 11 Nov 2013 Date of decision 31 Mar 2016 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/116/D/2324/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2152/en-US
Angela González Carreño v. Spain
Angela Gonz lez Carre o v. Spain CEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012 Communication number s : 047/2012 Author: Angela Gonz lez Carre o Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 58 Country Spain Submission date 19 Sep 2012 Date of decision 16 Jul 2014 Comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/58/D/47/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1878/en-US
Arkauz Arana v. France
Arkauz Arana v. France CAT/C/23/D/63/1997 Communication number s : 063/1997 Author: Josu Arkauz Arana Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 23 Country France Submission date 16 Dec 1996 Date of decision 09 Nov 1999 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/23/D/63/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/211/en-US
Atasoy and Sarkut v. Türkiye
Atasoy and Sarkut v. T rkiye CCPR/C/104/D/1853 1854/2008 Communication number s : 1853/2008 1854/2008 Author: Cenk Atasoy and Arda Sarkut Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country T rkiye Submission date 08 Dec 2008 Date of decision 29 JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1853-1854/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1627/en-US
B. & C. v. Czech Republic
B. C. v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010 Communication number s : 1967/2010 Author: B. and C. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 113 Country Czech Republic Submission date 18 Sep 2009 Date of decision 02 Apr 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/1967/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1944/en-US
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark
B.M.I. and N.A.K. v. Denmark CCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015 Communication number s : 2569/2015 Author: B.M.I. and N.A.K. represented by counsel Hannah Krog Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 118 Country Denmark Submission date 06 Feb 2015 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/118/D/2569/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2229/en-US
B. M. v. Switzerland
B. M. v. Switzerland CEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018 Communication number s : 132/2018 Author: B. M. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 83 Country Switzerland Submission date 09 Aug 2018 Date of decision 17 Oct 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCEDAW/C/83/D/132/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3557/en-US
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BANGLADESH: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/BGD/CO/1 NULL 2019 08 26T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/BGD/CO/1 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 26 August 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/BGD/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d1876765-1efb-46ea-9ec1-79ca133076db
BARBADOS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
BARBADOS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/BRB/CO/2 NULL 2017 03 03T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/BRB/CO/2 Convention on the Distr.: General 3 March 2017 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding observations UHRICRC/C/BRB/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/1f79e116-c439-40df-b958-e5f92465100c