Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1261 - 1280 of 1836
M.C. v. Guinea,Netherlands
M.C. v. Guinea Netherlands CAT/C/56/D/569/2013 Communication number s : 569/2013 Author: M.C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 56 Country Guinea Netherlands Submission date 17 Jun 2013 Date of decision 13 Nov 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/569/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2247/en-US
M.I. v. Sweden
M.I. v. Sweden CCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018 Communication number s : 3246/2018 Author: M.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Sep 2018 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3253/en-US
MONACO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
MONACO: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/MCO/CO/2 3 NULL 2013 10 28T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/MCO/CO/2 3 Convention on the Distr.: General 29 October 2013 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/MCO/CO/2-3https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d4db696b-21ee-4fec-ba00-e0fc35aa09f1
MURADYAN v. Armenia
MURADYAN v. Armenia ARM 24/02/2017 00:00:00 24/03/2017 11:39:16 Case Description: These cases concern the authorities failure to comply with their positive obligation to protect the applicants sons right to life during their military service as well as EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-46287
Machado de Campora and Campora Schweizer v. Uruguay
Machado de Campora and Campora Schweizer v. Uruguay CCPR/C/17/D/66/1980 Communication number s : 066/1980 Author: Olga Machado de Campora on behalf of her husband who later joined as submitting party Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 17 JUTBCCPR/C/17/D/66/1980https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/492/en-US
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014 Communication number s : 2502/2014 Author: Allan Brian Miller and Michael John Carroll Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country New Zealand Submission date 17 Feb 2014 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2433/en-US
Morrison (Everton) v. Jamaica
Morrison Everton v. Jamaica CCPR/C/63/D/635/1995 Communication number s : 635/1995 Author: Everton Morrison Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Jamaica Submission date 14 Jun 1995 Date of decision 27 Jul 1998 Comment: Individual JUTBCCPR/C/63/D/635/1995https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/352/en-US
Munarbek Torobekov v. Kyrgyzstan
Munarbek Torobekov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/103/D/1547/2007 Communication number s : 1547/2007 Author: Munarbek Torobekov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Apr 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2011 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1547/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1640/en-US
Musaeva v. Uzbekistan
Musaeva v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/104/D/1914 1915 1916/2009 Communication number s : 1915/2009 1916/2009 1914/2009 Author: Saida Musaeva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 18 Jan 2008 Date of decision 21 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1914,1915&1916/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1224/en-US
N.B. v. Russian Federation
N.B. v. Russian Federation CAT/C/56/D/577/2013 Communication number s : 577/2013 Author: N.B. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Russian Federation Submission date 13 May 2013 Date of decision 25 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCAT/C/56/D/577/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2067/en-US
N.R. v. Paraguay
N.R. v. Paraguay CRC/C/83/D/30/2017 Communication number s : 030/2017 Author: N.R. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Paraguay Submission date 10 May 2017 Date of decision 03 Feb 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCRC/C/83/D/30/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2629/en-US
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006 Communication number s : 1535/2006 Author: Nataliya Litvin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 15 Jun 2006 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1593/en-US
Nenova et al. v. Libya
Nenova et al. v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1880/2009 Communication number s : 1880/2009 Author: N.S. Nenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2009 Date of decision 20 Mar 2012 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1880/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1425/en-US
Njamba and Balikosa v. Democratic Republic of the Congo,Sweden
Njamba and Balikosa v. Democratic Republic of the Congo Sweden CAT/C/44/D/322/2007 Communication number s : 322/2007 Author: Eveline Njamba and her daughter Kathy Balikosa Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 44 Country Democratic Republic of JUTBCAT/C/44/D/322/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/70/en-US
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE SALE OF CHILDREN, CHILD PROSTITUTION AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS : NICARAGUA
OPTIONAL PROTOCOL TO THE CONVENTION ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD ON THE SALE OF CHILDREN CHILD PROSTITUTION AND CHILD PORNOGRAPHY : CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS : NICARAGUA CRC/C/OPSC/NIC/CO/1 NULL 2010 10 21T06:00:00 CRC OP SC United Nations CRC/C/OPSC/NIC/CO/1 UHRICRC/C/OPSC/NIC/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/53270279-b075-44cb-81b5-05797ff9e5c0
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
Oleg Boyarkin and T.P. v. Kyrgyzstan
Oleg Boyarkin and T.P. v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/130/D/2432/2014 Communication number s : 2432/2014 Author: Oleg Boyarkin and T.P. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 24 Dec 2012 Date of decision 30 Oct 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2432/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3434/en-US
Ozoda Yakubova v. Uzbekistan
Ozoda Yakubova v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/122/D/2577/2015 Communication number s : 2577/2015 Author: Ozoda Yakubova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 03 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2577/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2487/en-US