Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1481 - 1500 of 2084
N.S. v. Russian Federation
N.S. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/113/D/2192/2012 Communication number s : 2192/2012 Author: N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Aug 2012 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 Comment: Violation of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2192/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3089/en-US
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy
NASR AND GHALI v. Italy ITA 23/05/2016 00:00:00 30/01/2018 12:28:48 Case Description: The case concerns violations arising from an extraordinary rendition operation against the first applicant an Egyptian cleric suspected of terrorism related offences EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-28282
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey
NEDIM SENER v. Turkey TUR 08/10/2014 00:00:00 10/11/2016 16:04:14 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37296
NICARAGUA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NICARAGUA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/NIC/CO/4 NULL 2022 11 15T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/NIC/CO/4 International Covenant on Distr.: General 30 November 2022 Civil and Political Rights English Original: Spanish Human Rights Committee UHRICCPR/C/NIC/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/d8dbd04e-f040-4ffc-b84f-02fbb5d64640
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine
Nataliya Litvin v. Ukraine CCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006 Communication number s : 1535/2006 Author: Nataliya Litvin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 102 Country Ukraine Submission date 15 Jun 2006 Date of decision 19 Jul 2011 Comment: The text of JUTBCCPR/C/102/D/1535/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1593/en-US
Nenova et al. v. Libya
Nenova et al. v. Libya CCPR/C/104/D/1880/2009 Communication number s : 1880/2009 Author: N.S. Nenova et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Libya Submission date 31 Mar 2009 Date of decision 20 Mar 2012 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1880/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1425/en-US
O'Neill and Quinn v. Canada,Ireland
O Neill and Quinn v. Canada Ireland CCPR/C/87/D/1314/2004 Communication number s : 1314/2004 Author: Michael O Neill and John Quinn Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 87 Country Canada Ireland Submission date 14 Sep 2004 Date of decision 24 JUTBCCPR/C/87/D/1314/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1297/en-US
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey
ONER AND TURK v. Turkey TUR 30/06/2015 00:00:00 10/11/2016 11:41:27 Case Description: These groups mainly concern unjustified and disproportionate interferences with the applicants freedom of expression on account of criminal proceedings for having EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-36806
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
Olmedo v. Paraguay
Olmedo v. Paraguay CCPR/C/104/D/1828/2008 Communication number s : 1828/2008 Author: Florentina Olmedo Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 104 Country Paraguay Submission date 25 Aug 2008 Date of decision 22 Mar 2012 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/104/D/1828/2008https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1443/en-US
P.K. v. Canada
P.K. v. Canada CCPR/C/89/D/1234/2003 Communication number s : 1234/2003 Author: P.K. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 89 Country Canada Submission date 05 Dec 2003 Date of decision 20 Mar 2007 Comment: On 5 December 2003 Canada was JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1234/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1346/en-US
P.V. v. Australia
P.V. v. Australia CAT/C/60/D/708/2015 Communication number s : 708/2015 Author: P.V. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 60 Country Australia Submission date 20 Oct 2015 Date of decision 12 May 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/60/D/708/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3427/en-US
PORTUGAL: OPAC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: OPAC CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/OPAC/PRT/CO/1 NULL 2014 02 23T00:00:00 CRC OP AC United Nations CRC/C/OPAC/PRT/CO/1 Convention on the Distr.: General 24 February 2014 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child UHRICRC/C/OPAC/PRT/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/7c3880e7-b119-45bc-9893-330b6fac6fb4
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay CCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009 Communication number s : 1887/2009 Author: Juan Peirano Basso Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uruguay Submission date 05 May 2009 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1604/en-US
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic
Pezoldova v. Czech Republic CCPR/C/76/D/757/1997 Communication number s : 757/1997 Author: Alzbeta Pezoldova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Czech Republic Submission date 30 Sep 1996 Date of decision 25 Oct 2002 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/757/1997https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1025/en-US
Pinkney v. Canada
Pinkney v. Canada CCPR/C/14/D/27/1977 Communication number s : 027/1977 Author: Larry James Pinkney Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 14 Country Canada Submission date 25 Nov 1977 Date of decision 29 Oct 1981 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/14/D/27/1977https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/458/en-US
Prince v. South Africa
Prince v. South Africa CCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006 Communication number s : 1474/2006 Author: Gareth Anver Prince Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 91 Country South Africa Submission date 20 Oct 2005 Date of decision 31 Oct 2007 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/91/D/1474/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1380/en-US
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto (ETS No. 046)
Protocol No. 4 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms securing certain rights and freedoms other than those already included in the Convention and in the first Protocol thereto ETS No. 046 046 Strasbourg 1963 09 COEETS No. 046https://rm.coe.int/168006b65c
Public statement concerning the Chechen Republic of the Russian Federation
Public statement concerning the Chechen Republic of the Russian Federation RUS RUSNCR fcb fep fmmd 13/03/2007 13/03/2007 CPT/Inf 2007 17 European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment CPT Public statement CPTCPT/Inf (2007) 17https://hudoc.cpt.coe.int/eng?i=p-rus-2007decl-en
Q.A. v. Sweden
Q.A. v. Sweden CCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017 Communication number s : 3070/2017 Author: Q.A. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 127 Country Sweden Submission date 11 Dec 2017 Date of decision 30 Oct 2019 Comment: A joint opinion by Committee members JUTBCCPR/C/127/D/3070/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2806/en-US