Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 761 - 780 of 1141
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - ROMANIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ROMANIA ROU a13 a20 a22 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) SWEDEN
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SWEDEN SWE a24 2018 12 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)15_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)15_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gavrilin v. Belarus
Gavrilin v. Belarus CCPR/C/89/D/1342/2005 Communication number s : 1342/2005 Author: Maksim Gavrilin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 89 Country Belarus Submission date 28 Oct 2004 Date of decision 28 Mar 2007 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/89/D/1342/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1348/en-US
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania
Gelazauskas v. Lithuania CCPR/C/77/D/836/1998 Communication number s : 836/1998 Author: Kestutis Gelazauskas Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 77 Country Lithuania Submission date 14 Apr 1997 Date of decision 17 Mar 2003 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/836/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1036/en-US
Gillan v. Canada
Gillan v. Canada CCPR/C/69/D/936/2000 Communication number s : 936/2000 Author: Terry Gillan Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 69 Country Canada Submission date 09 Dec 1999 Date of decision 17 Jul 2000 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/936/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/887/en-US
Goekce v. Austria
Goekce v. Austria CEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005 Communication number s : 005/2005 Author: Hakan Goekce Handan Goekce and Guelue Goekce descendants of the deceased Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 39 Country Austria Submission date 21 Jul 2004 Date of JUTBCEDAW/C/39/D/5/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1715/en-US
Gombert v. France
Gombert v. France CCPR/C/77/D/987/2001 Communication number s : 987/2001 Author: Philippe Gombert Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 77 Country France Submission date 24 Sep 1999 Date of decision 18 Mar 2003 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/77/D/987/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1045/en-US
Gougnina v. Uzbekistan
Gougnina v. Uzbekistan CCPR/C/92/D/1141/2002 Communication number s : 1141/2002 Author: Rima Gougnina Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 92 Country Uzbekistan Submission date 13 Dec 2002 Date of decision 01 Apr 2008 Comment: On 13 JUTBCCPR/C/92/D/1141/2002https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1412/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway
Government comments on the fourth report on Norway NOR 2008 06 20 2009 02 24 Government comments on the report on NORWAY APPENDIX APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Norway ECRI ECRINOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=NOR-COM-IV-2009-004-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Government comments on the fourth report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2010 04 28 2010 06 15 Government comments on the report on THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix ECRIMKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Belgium
Government comments on the second report on Belgium BEL 1999 06 18 2000 03 21 APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its second report on Belgium is dated 18 June 1999 and that any subsequent development is not taken into ECRIBEL-COM-II-2000-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BEL-COM-II-2000-002-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Italy
Government comments on the second report on Italy ITA 2001 06 22 2002 04 23 The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy. APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-II-2002-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-II-2002-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Slovenia
Government comments on the third report on Slovenia SVN 2006 06 30 2007 02 13 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Slovenia ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRISVN-COM-III-2007-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=SVN-COM-III-2007-005-ENG
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
H.P.N. v. Spain
H.P.N. v. Spain CCPR/C/107/D/1943/2010 Communication number s : 1943/2010 Author: H.P.N. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 107 Country Spain Submission date 03 Feb 2010 Date of decision 25 Mar 2013 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/107/D/1943/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1330/en-US
H.S.V. v. Sweden
H.S.V. v. Sweden CAT/C/32/D/229/2003 Communication number s : 229/2003 Author: H.S.V. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 32 Country Sweden Submission date 24 Apr 2003 Date of decision 12 May 2004 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/32/D/229/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/144/en-US
Horvath v. Australia
Horvath v. Australia CCPR/C/110/D/1885/2009 Communication number s : 1885/2009 Author: Corinna Horvath Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 110 Country Australia Submission date 19 Aug 2008 Date of decision 27 Mar 2014 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/110/D/1885/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1802/en-US
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and