Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 61 - 80 of 225
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia
Hew Raymond Griffiths v. Australia CCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010 Communication number s : 1973/2010 Author: Hew Raymond Griffiths represented by counsels Joanna Mansfield and Nicolas Patrick Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country Australia JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/1973/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1893/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Bulgaria, Marshall Islands, United States and Croatia
17 March 2021 MORNING The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Bulgaria Marshall Islands United States and Croatia. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bulgaria were China Cuba Ethiopia India UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-bulgaria
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Liberia and Jamaica, Starts General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms
Special Procedures Are Ready to Contribute to Make the Call to Action for Human Rights a Reality Chairperson of Coordination Committee of Special Procedures Tells Human Rights Council 17 March 2021 AFTERNOON The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-liberia-and
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bosnia and Herzegovina, holds debate on the International Decade for People of African Descent, and suspends its forty-third session
Council Extends All Mandates and Mandated Activities that would otherwise Expire and Appoints 19 Special Procedure Mandate Holders The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Bosnia and Herzegovina and held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2020/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcome-bosnia-and
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom, India and Brazil
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 20 September 2012 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United Kingdom India and Brazil.Karen Pierce Permanent Representative of the United Kingdom to the United UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-kingdom
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review of Togo, Syria and Venezuela
Human Rights Council MORNING 16 March 2017The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Togo Syria and Venezuela. Kokouvi Agbetomey Minister for Justice and Relations with the Institutions of Togo thanked the UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-togo-syria
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of Universal Periodic Review on Latvia, Sierra Leone and Singapore
Human Rights Council MORNING 22 September 2011 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Latvia Sierra Leone and Singapore. Raimonds Jansons Permanent Representative of Latvia to the United Nations UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/09/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-latvia-sierra
Human Rights Council adopts outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Venezuela, Iceland and Zimbabwe
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 15 March 2012 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcomes of the Universal Periodic Review on Venezuela Iceland and Zimbabwe. Temir Porras Poneleon Vice Minister of the People s Ministry of External UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2012/03/human-rights-council-adopts-outcomes-universal-periodic-review-venezuela
J.P.D. v. France
J.P.D. v. France CCPR/C/115/D/2621/2015 Communication number s : 2621/2015 Author: Isabelle Coutant Peyre Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 115 Country France Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 02 Nov 2015 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2621/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2086/en-US
Khalilova v. Tajikistan
Khalilova v. Tajikistan CCPR/C/83/D/973/2001 Communication number s : 973/2001 Author: Maryam Khalilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 83 Country Tajikistan Submission date 14 May 2001 Date of decision 30 Mar 2005 Comment: in accordance JUTBCCPR/C/83/D/973/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1151/en-US
Kurakbaev and Sabdikenova v. Kazakhstan
Kurakbaev and Sabdikenova v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/132/D/2509/2014 Communication number s : 2509/2014 Author: Sharip Kurakbaev and Raikhan Sabdikenova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 132 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 06 May 2014 Date of JUTBCCPR/C/132/D/2509/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3186/en-US
Lapshin v. Belarus
Lapshin v. Belarus CCPR/C/135/D/2945/2017 Communication number s : 2945/2017 Author: Alexander Lapshin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 135 Country Belarus Submission date 01 Feb 2017 Date of decision 19 Jul 2022 Comment: This document has JUTBCCPR/C/135/D/2945/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3484/en-US
Latifulin v. Kyrgyzstan
Latifulin v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/98/D/1312/2004 Communication number s : 1312/2004 Author: Rustam Latifulin Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 98 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 28 Jun 2004 Date of decision 10 Mar 2010 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/98/D/1312/2004https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1556/en-US
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan
Lukpan Akhmedyarov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015 Communication number s : 2535/2015 Author: Lukpan Akhmedyarov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 129 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 29 Apr 2014 Date of decision 23 Jul 2020 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/129/D/2535/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2860/en-US
Lula da Silva v. Brazil
Lula da Silva v. Brazil CCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 INITIAL PROCEEDINGS Communication number s : 2841/2016 Author: Luiz In cio Lula da Silva Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 134 Country Brazil Submission date 28 Jul 2016 Date of decision 17 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/134/D/2841/2016 (INITIAL PROCEEDINGS)https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3115/en-US
M.I. v. Sweden
M.I. v. Sweden CCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018 Communication number s : 3246/2018 Author: M.I. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 130 Country Sweden Submission date 18 Sep 2018 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/3246/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3253/en-US
Merhdad Mohammad Jamshidian v. Belarus
Merhdad Mohammad Jamshidian v. Belarus CCPR/C/121/D/2471/2014 Communication number s : 2471/2014 Author: Merhdad Mohammad Jamshidian Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 121 Country Belarus Submission date 23 Oct 2014 Date of decision 08 Nov JUTBCCPR/C/121/D/2471/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2352/en-US
Munarbek Torobekov v. Kyrgyzstan
Munarbek Torobekov v. Kyrgyzstan CCPR/C/103/D/1547/2007 Communication number s : 1547/2007 Author: Munarbek Torobekov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 103 Country Kyrgyzstan Submission date 12 Apr 2006 Date of decision 27 Oct 2011 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/103/D/1547/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1640/en-US
Murat Telibekov v. Kazakhstan
Murat Telibekov v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/128/D/2687/2015 Communication number s : 2687/2015 Author: Murat Telibekov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 13 Dec 2013 Date of decision 13 Mar 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2687/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2827/en-US
N.S. v. Russian Federation
N.S. v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/113/D/2192/2012 Communication number s : 2192/2012 Author: N.S. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Russian Federation Submission date 21 Aug 2012 Date of decision 27 Mar 2015 Comment: Violation of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2192/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3089/en-US