Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 88
11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. b Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the involvement of children in armed conflict New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 12 February 2002 in accordance UNIV-11-bhttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-b&chapter=4&clang=_en
A/HRC/47/18: Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/47/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 23 April 2021 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty seventh session 21 June 9 July 2021 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/47/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/ahrc4718-operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017 Communication number s : 3082/2017 Author: Ahmed Souaiene and A cha Souaiene Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Sep 2017 Date of decision 27 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2873/en-US
Anton v. Algeria
Anton v. Algeria CCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005 Communication number s : 1424/2005 Author: Armand Anton Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 88 Country Algeria Submission date 24 Nov 2004 Date of decision 01 Nov 2006 Comment: In accordance with JUTBCCPR/C/88/D/1424/2005https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1324/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF A. AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 3455/05 BIRNBERG PIERCE AND PARTNERS GBR 2/19/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 No violation of Art. 13 3 Preliminary objection rejected Government not precluded from raising defence under Art. 5 1 f or ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0219JUD000345505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-91403
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF ABU ZUBAYDAH v. LITHUANIA 46454/11 DUFFY H. MICKUM IV G.B. MARGULIES J. LTU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Victim Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD004645411https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183687
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. POLAND 28761/11 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD002876111https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146044
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA
CASE OF AL NASHIRI v. ROMANIA 33234/12 GOLDSTON J.A. SKILBECK R. SINGH A. HOLLANDER N. HATNEANU D.O. ROU 5/31/2018 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0531JUD003323412https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-183685
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF BIG BROTHER WATCH AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 58170/13 62322/14 24960/15 CAREY D. CURLING R. NORTON E. GBR 9/13/2018 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded Violation of Article 8 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0913JUD005817013https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-186048
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL
CASE OF CORREIA DE MATOS v. PORTUGAL 56402/12 PRT 4/4/2018 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 6 6 3 c Right to a fair trial Article 6 Criminal proceedings Article 6 1 Fair hearing Equality of arms Article 6 3 c Defence in person Article 6 Right to a fair ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2018:0404JUD005640212https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-182243
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC
CASE OF D.H. AND OTHERS v. THE CZECH REPUBLIC 57325/00 LORD LESTER OF HERNE HILL QC GOLDSTON J. STRUPEK D. CZE 11/13/2007 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed non exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Art. 14 P1 2 General measures refused ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2007:1113JUD005732500https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-83256
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF EWEIDA AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 48420/10 36516/10 51671/10 59842/10 AUGHTON AINSWORTH P. DIAMOND ORMERODS GBR 1/15/2013 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Violation of Article 9 Freedom of thought conscience and religion Article 9 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0115JUD004842010https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115881
CASE OF HUSAYN (ABU ZUBAYDAH) v. POLAND
CASE OF HUSAYN ABU ZUBAYDAH v. POLAND 7511/13 HUGHES P. DUFFY H. VANDOVA V. MARGULIES J. MICKUM G.B. JANKOWSKI B. POL 7/24/2014 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0724JUD000751113https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-146047
CASE OF KAVALA v. TURKEY
CASE OF KAVALA v. TURKEY 28749/18 BAYRAKTAR K. TUR 12/10/2019 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security Article 5 1 Lawful arrest or detention Article 5 1 c Reasonable suspicion Violation of Article 5 Right to liberty and security ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:1210JUD002874918https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-199515
CASE OF MACATĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF MACAT v. LITHUANIA 61435/19 MIZARAS V. WINTEMUTE R. DINGILEVSKIS M. LTU 1/23/2023 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 b No significant disadvantage Violation of Article 10 Freedom of expression ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0123JUD006143519https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-222072
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA
CASE OF MERABISHVILI v. GEORGIA 72508/13 LEACH P. SAWYER J. GEO 11/28/2017 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Art. 35 4 Rejection of application at any stage of the ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2017:1128JUD007250813https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-178753
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MUR I v. CROATIA 7334/13 VIDOVIC Z. HRV 10/20/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000733413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167483