Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 41 - 60 of 338
CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA
CASE OF MOZER v. THE REPUBLIC OF MOLDOVA AND RUSSIA 11138/10 POSTICA A. STRAISTEANU D. POSTICA P. MDA RUS 2/23/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione loci Ratione personae Russia Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:0223JUD001113810https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-161055
CASE OF MURŠIĆ v. CROATIA
CASE OF MUR I v. CROATIA 7334/13 VIDOVIC Z. HRV 10/20/2016 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Article 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Degrading treatment Substantive aspect No violation ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2016:1020JUD000733413https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-167483
CASE OF N. v. FINLAND
CASE OF N. v. FINLAND 38885/02 BERGMAN THOMAS FIN 7/26/2005 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 if expelled No separate issue under Art. 8 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient Aliens Act 1991 Aliens Act 2004 350 90 193 492 451 425 429 216 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2005:0726JUD003888502https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-69908
CASE OF N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF N. v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 26565/05 LUQMANI J.THOMPSON PARTNERS GBR 5/27/2008 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 3 in the event of the applicant being removed to Uganda 350 90 193 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505 GRAND CHAMBER CASE OF N. v. THE ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2008:0527JUD002656505https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-86490
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND
CASE OF NADA v. SWITZERLAND 10593/08 MCBRIDE J. CHE 9/12/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Article 35 3 Ratione personae Preliminary objections dismissed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 35 3 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0912JUD001059308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-113118
CASE OF S.J. v. BELGIUM
CASE OF S.J. v. BELGIUM 70055/10 MICHOLT S. BEL 3/19/2015 12:00:00 AM Struck out of the list Article 37 1 Striking out applications Article 37 1 b Matter resolved 350 620 451 628 444 110 609 478 241 138 165 ECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0319JUD007005510 GRAND CHAMBER ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2015:0319JUD007005510https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-153361
CASE OF VALIULIENĖ v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF VALIULIEN v. LITHUANIA 33234/07 MICKEVICIUS H. LTU 3/26/2013 12:00:00 AM Violation of Article 3 Prohibition of torture Article 3 Positive obligations Substantive aspect Non pecuniary damage award Article 116 of the old Criminal Code Article 140 1 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0326JUD003323407https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-117636
CASE OF VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE
CASE OF VALLIANATOS AND OTHERS v. GREECE 29381/09 32684/09 GREEK HELSINKI MONITOR ALIVIZATOS N. MALLIOS E. GRC 11/7/2013 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection partially allowed Article 34 Victim Preliminary objection partially dismissed Article 34 Victim ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:1107JUD002938109https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-128294
CASE OF VAN DER HEIJDEN v. THE NETHERLANDS
CASE OF VAN DER HEIJDEN v. THE NETHERLANDS 42857/05 SPRONKEN T. WEENING S. NLD 4/3/2012 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life Articles 217 221 223 of the Code of Criminal ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:0403JUD004285705https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-110188
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA
CASE OF X AND OTHERS v. AUSTRIA 19010/07 GRAUPNER H. AUT 2/19/2013 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 14 8 Prohibition of discrimination Article 14 Discrimination Article 8 Right to respect for private and family life Article 8 1 Respect for family life ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2013:0219JUD001901007https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-116735
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN : MOROCCO
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF DISCRIMINATION AGAINST WOMEN : MOROCCO CEDAW/C/MAR/CO/4 NULL 2008 05 16T06:00:00 CEDAW United Nations CEDAW/C/MAR/CO/4 Distr.: General 8 April 2008 Convention on the Elimination UHRICEDAW/C/MAR/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2447013b-25f9-4b57-a333-138ff8cccd76
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD : FRANCE
CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE RIGHTS OF THE CHILD : FRANCE CRC/C/FRA/CO/4 NULL 2009 06 22T00:00:00 CRC UNITED NATIONS CRC Convention on the Distr. Rights of the Child GENERAL CRC/C/FRA/CO/4 22 June 2009 Original: ENGLISH COMMITTEE ON THE UHRICRC/C/FRA/CO/4https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/ac554635-c13c-4dab-8776-a8ec05a91188
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MALI
CONSIDERATION OF REPORTS SUBMITTED BY STATES PARTIES UNDER ARTICLE 44 OF THE CONVENTION: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS: MALI CRC/C/MLI/CO/2 NULL 2007 05 03T06:00:00 CRC UNITED NATIONS CRC Distr. GENERAL Convention on the Rights of the Child CRC/C/MLI/CO/2 3 May UHRICRC/C/MLI/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/be6c0b54-76c1-49f5-8844-a5c0ea2e1fc4
Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review on the United States, holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 18 March 2011 The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review on the United States and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Harold Hongju Koh Legal Adviser of UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2011/03/council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-united-states-holds-general
Council holds general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concludes the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms
Human Rights CouncilAFTERNOON17 March 2017The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review and concluded the general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms. In the general debate on the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2017/03/council-holds-general-debate-universal-periodic-review-and-concludes-general
Council of Europe Convention on Laundering, Search, Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism (CETS No. 198)
Council of Europe Convention on Laundering Search Seizure and Confiscation of the Proceeds from Crime and on the Financing of Terrorism CETS No. 198 198 Warsaw 2005 05 16T00:00:00 Treaty open for signature by the member States the non member States which COECETS No. 198https://rm.coe.int/168008371f
Cox v. Canada
Cox v. Canada CCPR/C/52/D/539/1993 Communication number s : 539/1993 Author: Keith Cox Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 52 Country Canada Submission date 04 Jan 1993 Date of decision 31 Oct 1994 Comment: 8 individual opinions were submitted JUTBCCPR/C/52/D/539/1993https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/576/en-US
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro (CGIL) v. Italy, Complaint No. 91/2013
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Confederazione Generale Italiana del Lavoro CGIL v. Italy Complaint No. 91/2013 ITA 11 01 000 91 154 163 01 02 000 02 01 000 03 03 000 26 02 163 2015 10 12 2016 04 11 European Committee of Social Rights Comit ESCcc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-91-2013-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home-Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family (EUROCEF) v. France, Complaint No. 82/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: European Committee for Home Based Priority Action for the Child and the Family EUROCEF v. France Complaint No. 82/2012 FRA 16 00 000 30 00 163 91 175 163 91 212 163 19/03/2013 15/07/2013 European Committee of ESCcc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-82-2012-dadmissandmerits-en
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation (LO) and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees (TCO) v. Sweden, Complaint No. 85/2012
Decision on admissibility and the merits: Swedish Trade Union Confederation LO and Swedish Confederation of Professional Employees TCO v. Sweden Complaint No. 85/2012 SWE 06 02 000 06 04 000 19 04 000 03/07/2013 05/02/2014 European Committee of Social ESCcc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-enhttps://hudoc.esc.coe.int/eng?i=cc-85-2012-dadmissandmerits-en