Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1 - 20 of 268
11. Convention on the Rights of the Child
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. Convention on the Rights of the Child New York 20 November 1989 Entry into force : 2 September 1990 in accordance with article 49 1 . Registration : 2 September 1990 No. 27531 Status : UNIV-11https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11&chapter=4&clang=_en
11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children, child prostitution and child pornography
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 11. c Optional Protocol to the Convention on the Rights of the Child on the sale of children child prostitution and child pornography New York 25 May 2000 Entry into force : 18 January 2002 in UNIV-11-chttps://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-11-c&chapter=4&clang=_en
4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
STATUS AS AT : 14 06 2023 09:15:30 EDT CHAPTER IV HUMAN RIGHTS 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights New York 16 December 1966 Entry into force : 23 March 1976 in accordance with article 49 for all provisions except those of article 41 UNIV-4https://treaties.un.org//Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-4&chapter=4&clang=_en
Aïcha Habouchi v. Algeria
A cha Habouchi v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016 Communication number s : 2819/2016 Author: A cha Habouchi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 07 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 Mar 2020 Comment: This document JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2819/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2871/en-US
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF-DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE WORKING GROUP ON THE USE OF MERCENARIES AS A MEANS OF VIOLATING HUMAN RIGHTS AND IMPEDING THE EXERCISE OF THE RIGHT OF PEOPLES TO SELF DETERMINATION ADDENDUM : MISSION TO HONDURAS A/HRC/24/45/Add.1 NULL 2013 08 05T00:00:00 WG UHRIA/HRC/24/45/Add.1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3da0110e-6a50-4290-bd4f-20e5594b1e7b
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria
Ahmed Souaiene et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017 Communication number s : 3082/2017 Author: Ahmed Souaiene and A cha Souaiene Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Sep 2017 Date of decision 27 Mar JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/3082/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2873/en-US
Alekseev v. Russian Federation
Alekseev v. Russian Federation CCPR/C/130/D/2727/2016 Communication number s : 2727/2016 Author: Nikolai Alekseev Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Russian Federation Submission date 24 Nov 2014 Date of decision 16 Oct 2020 JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2727/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3297/en-US
Arab Millis v. Algeria
Arab Millis v. Algeria CCPR/C/122/D/2398/2014 Communication number s : 2398/2014 Author: Arab Millis Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Algeria Submission date 10 Mar 2014 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2398/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2486/en-US
Bee and Obiang v. Equatorial Guinea
Bee and Obiang v. Equatorial Guinea CCPR/C/85/D/1152 1190/2003 Communication number s : 1152/2003 1190/2003 Author: Patricio Ndong Bee and Mar a Jes s Bikene Obiang Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 85 Country Equatorial Guinea Submission JUTBCCPR/C/85/D/1152&1190/2003https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1237/en-US
C. v. Australia
C. v. Australia CCPR/C/76/D/900/1999 Communication number s : 900/1999 Author: C. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 76 Country Australia Submission date 23 Nov 1999 Date of decision 28 Oct 2002 Comment: Under rule 85 of the Committee s rules JUTBCCPR/C/76/D/900/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1026/en-US
C v. Australia
C v. Australia CCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012 Communication number s : 2216/2012 Author: C Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country Australia Submission date 27 Apr 2012 Date of decision 28 Mar 2017 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2216/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2375/en-US
CASE OF AL-SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SAADOON AND MUFDHI v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 61498/08 SHINER P. GBR 3/2/2010 12:00:00 AM Violation of Art. 3 substantive aspect No violation of Art. 6 Violation of Art. 13 Violation of Art. 34 Non pecuniary damage finding of violation sufficient 26 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2010:0302JUD006149808https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-97575
CASE OF AL-SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM
CASE OF AL SKEINI AND OTHERS v. THE UNITED KINGDOM 55721/07 PUBLIC INTEREST LAWYERS GBR 7/7/2011 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed estoppel non exhaustion of domestic remedies Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed lack of ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2011:0707JUD005572107https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-105606
CASE OF ÖCALAN v. TURKEY (No. 2) [Extracts]
CASE OF CALAN v. TURKEY No. 2 Extracts 24069/03 197/04 6201/06 10464/07 OTTY T. MULLER M. TUGLUK A. ERBAS D. DUNDAR I. KAPLAN H. TEPE M. KOSTAK F. AYDINKAYA F. GUNES O. BILMEZ I. KAYA B. TUR S. EMEKCI E. BILGIC K. KORKUT H. SAKAR M. YALCINDAG R. BULGAN N. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2014:0318JUD002406903https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-142087
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE
CASE OF DE SOUZA RIBEIRO v. FRANCE 22689/07 MONGET SARRAIL D. FRA 12/13/2012 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection joined to merits and dismissed Article 34 Victim Violation of Article 13 8 Right to an effective remedy Article 13 Effective remedy Article 8 2 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2012:1213JUD002268907https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-115498
CASE OF DRĖLINGAS v. LITHUANIA
CASE OF DR LINGAS v. LITHUANIA 28859/16 N/A LTU 3/12/2019 12:00:00 AM No violation of Article 7 No punishment without law Article 7 1 Nullum crimen sine lege Retroactivity Criminal offence Article 99 of the Lithuanian Criminal Code 288 536 291 434 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2019:0312JUD002885916https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-191702
CASE OF F.H. v. SWEDEN
CASE OF F.H. v. SWEDEN 32621/06 BREDBERG H. SWE 1/20/2009 12:00:00 AM No violation of Art. 2 No violation of Art. 3 Chapter 1 Article 8 of the Penal Code Chapter 8 sections 8 11 and 14 Chapter 12 sections 4 14 and 20 of the 2005 Aliens Act 350 90 193 449 ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2009:0120JUD003262106https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-90743
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA (II)
CASE OF GEORGIA v. RUSSIA II 38263/08 RUS 1/21/2021 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objections dismissed Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 1 Exhaustion of domestic remedies Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0121JUD003826308https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-207757
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE
CASE OF H.F. AND OTHERS v. FRANCE 24384/19 44234/20 DOS M. FRA 9/14/2022 12:00:00 AM Preliminary objection dismissed Art. 34 Individual applications Art. 34 Locus standi Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Ratione loci Art. ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2022:0914JUD002438419https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-219333
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY
CASE OF HANAN v. GERMANY 4871/16 KALECK W. DEU 2/16/2021 12:00:00 AM Remainder inadmissible Art. 35 Admissibility criteria Art. 35 3 a Manifestly ill founded No violation of Article 2 Right to life Article 2 1 Effective investigation Procedural aspect ECHRECLI:CE:ECHR:2021:0216JUD000487116https://hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng?i=001-208279