Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 821 - 840 of 1904
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Austria
Government comments on the third report on Austria AUT 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Austria ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIAUT-COM-III-2005-001-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-COM-III-2005-001-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Bulgaria
Government comments on the third report on Bulgaria BGR 2003 06 27 2004 01 27 Government comments on the n report on BULGARIA APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Bulgaria ECRI ECRIBGR-COM-III-2004-002-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=BGR-COM-III-2004-002-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Italy
Government comments on the third report on Italy ITA 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Italy ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its ECRIITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ITA-COM-III-2006-019-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Romania
Government comments on the third report on Romania ROU 2005 06 24 2006 02 21 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Romania ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=ROU-COM-III-2006-003-ENG
Government comments on the third report on “the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia”
Government comments on the third report on the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2004 06 25 2005 02 15 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in the Former Yugoslav Republic of ECRIMKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-III-2005-004-ENG
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus
Grishkovtsov v. Belarus CCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010 Communication number s : 2013/2010 Author: Oleg Grishkovtsov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 113 Country Belarus Submission date 06 Dec 2010 Date of decision 01 Apr 2015 Comment: Imposition of JUTBCCPR/C/113/D/2013/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1915/en-US
Gruca v. Poland
Gruca v. Poland CCPR/C/114/D/2183/2012 Communication number s : 2183/2012 Author: Gruca Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 114 Country Poland Submission date 15 Apr 2012 Date of decision 23 Jul 2015 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/114/D/2183/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1956/en-US
H.A.D. v. Switzerland
H.A.D. v. Switzerland CAT/C/24/D/126/1999 Communication number s : 126/1999 Author: H.A.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Switzerland Submission date 21 Jan 1999 Date of decision 10 May 2000 Comment: Pursuant to rule 108 JUTBCAT/C/24/D/126/1999https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/212/en-US
H.A. v. Sweden
H.A. v. Sweden CAT/C/63/D/744/2016 Communication number s : 744/2016 Author: H.A. represented by counsel Viktoria Nystr m Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 63 Country Sweden Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 11 May 2018 Comment: JUTBCAT/C/63/D/744/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2737/en-US
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada
H.B.A. et al. v. Canada CAT/C/56/D/536/2013 Communication number s : 536/2013 Author: H.B.A. et al. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 56 Country Canada Submission date 14 Nov 2012 Date of decision 02 Dec 2015 Comment: This document has JUTBCAT/C/56/D/536/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2070/en-US
H.B.H. et al. v. Switzerland
H.B.H. et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/30/D/192/2001 Communication number s : 192/2001 Author: H.B. H. T.N. T. H.J. H. H.O. H. H.R. H. and H.G. H. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 30 Country Switzerland Submission date 15 Oct 2001 Date of JUTBCAT/C/30/D/192/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/173/en-US
H.Y. v. Switzerland
H.Y. v. Switzerland CAT/C/61/D/747/2016 Communication number s : 747/2016 Author: H.Y. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 61 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 May 2016 Date of decision 09 Aug 2017 Comment: Decision of violation JUTBCAT/C/61/D/747/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2279/en-US
H. v. Sweden
H. v. Sweden CAT/C/58/D/627/2014 Communication number s : 627/2014 Author: H. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 58 Country Sweden Submission date 29 Aug 2014 Date of decision 05 Aug 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/58/D/627/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3012/en-US
Hebbadj v. France
Hebbadj v. France CCPR/C/123/D/2807/2016 Communication number s : 2807/2016 Author: Miriana Hebbadj Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 123 Country France Submission date 03 Mar 2016 Date of decision 17 Jul 2018 Comment: Joint opinion of JUTBCCPR/C/123/D/2807/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3541/en-US
Henley v. Australia
Henley v. Australia CRPD/C/27/D/56/2018 Communication number s : 56/2018 Author: Lauren Henley Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 27 Country Australia Submission date 03 Oct 2018 Date of decision 26 Aug 2022 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/27/D/56/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3608/en-US
Himal and Devi Sharma v. Nepal
Himal and Devi Sharma v. Nepal CCPR/C/122/D/2265/2013 Communication number s : 2265/2013 Author: Himal and Devi Sharma Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 122 Country Nepal Submission date 22 Apr 2013 Date of decision 06 Apr 2018 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/122/D/2265/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2491/en-US
Hosseiny et al. v. Switzerland
Hosseiny et al. v. Switzerland CAT/C/71/D/812/2017 Communication number s : 812/2017 Author: Namigh Hosseiny Fariba Masroory and Avin Hosseiny Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Switzerland Submission date 17 Feb 2017 Date of JUTBCAT/C/71/D/812/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3365/en-US
Human Rights Council Adopts Universal Periodic Review Outcomes of Australia, Saint Lucia, and Nepal
8 July 2021 The Human Rights Council in a midday meeting adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Australia Saint Lucia and Nepal. Speaking on the Universal Periodic Review outcome of Australia were Malawi Marshall Islands Morocco Namibia Nepal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2021/07/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-australia
Human Rights Council Holds High-level Panel Discussion on the Voluntary Funds for the Universal Periodic Review, including Achievements and Optimised Support to States in the Implementation of Recommendations
The Human Rights Council this afternoon held a high level panel discussion on the Voluntary Fund for Participation in the Universal Periodic Review and the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2023/03/human-rights-council-holds-high-level-panel-discussion-voluntary-funds-universal