Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 1021 - 1040 of 2743
Marshall v. Jamaica
Marshall v. Jamaica CCPR/C/64/D/730/1996 Communication number s : 730/1996 Author: Clarence Marshall Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 64 Country Jamaica Submission date 04 Dec 1996 Date of decision 03 Nov 1998 Comment: This document has no JUTBCCPR/C/64/D/730/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/814/en-US
Michael Lockrey v. Australia
Michael Lockrey v. Australia CRPD/C/15/D/13/2013 Communication number s : 013/2013 Author: Michael Lockrey Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 15 Country Australia Submission date 08 Apr 2013 Date of decision 01 Apr 2016 Comment: This document JUTBCRPD/C/15/D/13/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2143/en-US
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand
Miller et.al. v. New Zealand CCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014 Communication number s : 2502/2014 Author: Allan Brian Miller and Michael John Carroll Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 119 Country New Zealand Submission date 17 Feb 2014 Date of decision JUTBCCPR/C/119/D/2502/2014https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2433/en-US
Munoz Hermoza v. Peru
Munoz Hermoza v. Peru CCPR/C/34/D/203/1986 Communication number s : 203/1986 Author: Ruben Toribio Munoz Hermoza Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 34 Country Peru Submission date 31 Jan 1986 Date of decision 04 Nov 1988 Comment: Two JUTBCCPR/C/34/D/203/1986https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/655/en-US
N.A.O. v. Sweden
N.A.O. v. Sweden CAT/C/71/D/904/2018 Communication number s : 904/2018 Author: N.A.O. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 71 Country Sweden Submission date 21 Dec 2018 Date of decision 19 Jul 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/71/D/904/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3371/en-US
N’Dour v. Morocco
N Dour v. Morocco CAT/C/72/D/650/2015 Communication number s : 650/2015 Author: Omar N Dour Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 72 Country Morocco Submission date 28 Nov 2014 Date of decision 19 Nov 2021 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/72/D/650/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3338/en-US
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine
NEVMERZHITSKY v. Ukraine UKR 12/10/2005 00:00:00 08/11/2016 10:44:14 Case Description: These cases mainly concern inhuman and/or degrading treatment due to overcrowding poor material conditions and inadequate nutrition in police establishments pre trial EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-31306
NIGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NIGERIA: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CCPR/C/NGA/CO/2 NULL 2019 08 29T00:00:00 CCPR United Nations CCPR/C/NGA/CO/2 International Covenant on Distr.: General 29 August 2019 Civil and Political Rights Original: English Human Rights Committee Concluding UHRICCPR/C/NGA/CO/2https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/5e0fdaed-0128-4080-a728-ec18df7ee659
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan
Nurlanuly v. Kazakhstan CCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015 Communication number s : 2546/2015 Author: Damir Nurlanuly Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 130 Country Kazakhstan Submission date 02 Sep 2014 Date of decision 06 Nov 2020 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/130/D/2546/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3255/en-US
Nyusti and Takács v. Hungary
Nyusti and Tak cs v. Hungary CRPD/C/9/D/1/2010 Communication number s : 001/2010 Author: Szilvia Nyusti and P ter Tak cs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 9 Country Hungary Submission date 11 Mar 2010 Date of decision 16 Apr 2013 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/9/D/1/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1986/en-US
O.M. v. Ukraine
O.M. v. Ukraine CEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015 Communication number s : 087/2015 Author: O.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 73 Country Ukraine Submission date 01 Sep 2014 Date of decision 19 Jul 2019 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/73/D/87/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2655/en-US
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for participation in the universal periodic review - Report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/41/28 General Assembly Distr.: General 1 May 2019 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty first session 24 June 12 July 2019 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and reports UPRA/HRC/41/28https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report-united
Operations of the Voluntary Trust Fund for Participation inthe Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner forHuman Rights
United Nations A/HRC/38/26 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 April 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty eighth session 18 June 6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/38/26https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-trust-fund-participation-inthe-universal-periodic-review
Operations of the voluntary fund for participation in the universal periodic review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/44/18 General Assembly Distr.: General 15 April 2020 Original: English Human Rights Council Forty fourth session 15 June 3 July 2020 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/44/18https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-participation-universal-periodic-review-report-office
P.H.A. v. Denmark
P.H.A. v. Denmark CEDAW/C/65/D/61/2013 Communication number s : 61/2013 Author: P.H.A. Type of decision: Inadmissibility decision Session No 65 Country Denmark Submission date 11 Sep 2013 Date of decision 07 Nov 2016 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/65/D/61/2013https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3453/en-US
PERU : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
PERU : OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/PER/1 NULL 2017 08 09T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/PER/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 9 August 2017 English and Other Cruel Inhuman Original: UHRICAT/OP/PER/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/f2642e4e-8792-4cd9-b0b6-c004eebe10be
POLAND: RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY
POLAND: RECOMMENDATIONS AND OBSERVATIONS TO THE STATE PARTY CAT/OP/POL/ROSP/1 NULL 2020 01 21T00:00:00 SPT United Nations CAT/OP/POL/ROSP/1 Optional Protocol to the Distr.: General Convention against Torture 21 January 2020 and Other Cruel Inhuman UHRICAT/OP/POL/ROSP/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/4c52743e-0f90-41f8-9bf2-7d8d3d1d6bbc
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
PORTUGAL: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CAT/C/PRT/CO/7 NULL 2019 12 18T00:00:00 CAT United Nations CAT/C/PRT/CO/7 Convention against Torture Distr.: General 18 December 2019 and Other Cruel Inhuman or Degrading Treatment Original: English or Punishment UHRICAT/C/PRT/CO/7https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/2d6c6fcd-4ba3-498d-8285-84d30e7d5649
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay
Peirano Basso v. Uruguay CCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009 Communication number s : 1887/2009 Author: Juan Peirano Basso Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 100 Country Uruguay Submission date 05 May 2009 Date of decision 19 Oct 2010 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/100/D/1887/2009https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1604/en-US