Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 521 - 540 of 1301
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - GERMANY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention GERMANY DEU a22 a57 aco GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2022)21_eng_Germany_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) ITALY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ITALY ITA exe 2019 11 15 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2019)18_Italy_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2019)18_Italy_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) - ROMANIA
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention ROMANIA ROU a13 a20 a22 GREVIOGREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO_Inf_2022_6_Romania_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) SWEDEN
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention SWEDEN SWE a24 2018 12 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)15_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)15_Sweden_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
GREVIO’s (Baseline) Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence (Istanbul Convention) TURKEY
GREVIO s Baseline Evaluation Report on legislative and other measures giving effect to the provisions of the Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence Istanbul Convention TURKEY TUR a15 a22 a25 GREVIOGREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_enghttps://hudoc.grevio.coe.int/eng?i=GREVIO-Inf(2018)6_Turkey_Baseline_Evaluation_Report_eng
Gillot et al. v. France
Gillot et al. v. France CCPR/C/75/D/932/2000 Communication number s : 932/2000 Author: Marie H l ne Gillot et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 75 Country France Submission date 25 Jun 1999 Date of decision 15 Jul 2002 Comment: This JUTBCCPR/C/75/D/932/2000https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1011/en-US
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey
Government comments on the fourth report on Turkey TUR 2010 12 10 2011 02 08 Government comments on the report on TURKEY APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the ECRITUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=TUR-COM-IV-2011-005-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom
Government comments on the fourth report on the United Kingdom GBR 2009 01 17 2010 03 02 Government comments on the report on THE UNITED KINGDOM APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and ECRIGBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=GBR-COM-IV-2010-004-ENG
Government comments on the fourth report on "the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia"
Government comments on the fourth report on the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia MKD 2010 04 28 2010 06 15 Government comments on the report on THE FORMER YUGOSLAV REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA APPENDIX: GOVERNMENT S VIEWPOINT APPENDIXThe following appendix ECRIMKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=MKD-COM-IV-2010-019-ENG
Government comments on the second report on Austria
Government comments on the second report on Austria AUT 2000 06 16 2001 04 03 APPENDIX ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in its second report on Austria is dated 16 June 2000 and that any subsequent development is not taken into ECRIAUT-COM-II-2001-003-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=AUT-COM-II-2001-003-ENG
Government comments on the third report on Denmark
Government comments on the third report on Denmark DNK 2005 12 16 2006 05 16 APPENDIX The following appendix does not form part of ECRI s analysis and proposals concerning the situation in Denmark ECRI wishes to point out that the analysis contained in ECRIDNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENGhttps://hudoc.ecri.coe.int/eng?i=DNK-COM-III-2006-018-ENG
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal
Guengueng et al. v. Senegal CAT/C/36/D/181/2001 Communication number s : 181/2001 Author: Suleymane Guengueng et al. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 36 Country Senegal Submission date 18 Apr 2001 Date of decision 17 May 2006 Comment: In JUTBCAT/C/36/D/181/2001https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/116/en-US
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan
Gurbanova and Muradhasilova v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017 Communication number s : 2952/2017 Author: Matanat Baliyar Gizi Gurbanova and Saadat Baliyar Gizi Muradhasilova Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 131 Country Azerbaijan JUTBCCPR/C/131/D/2952/2017https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3249/en-US
H.D. v. Switzerland
H.D. v. Switzerland CAT/C/22/D/112/1998 Communication number s : 112/1998 Author: H.D. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Switzerland Submission date 04 Jun 1998 Date of decision 30 Apr 1999 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCAT/C/22/D/112/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/261/en-US
HONDURAS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
HONDURAS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CMW/C/HND/CO/1 NULL 2016 10 03T00:00:00 CMW United Nations CMW/C/HND/CO/1 International Convention on the Distr.: General 3 October 2016 Protection of the Rights of English All Migrant Workers and Original: Spanish UHRICMW/C/HND/CO/1https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/cb6f6228-706d-4144-89e8-f0dfc46a7b3e
Halima Louddi v. Algeria
Halima Louddi v. Algeria CCPR/C/112/D/2117/2011 Communication number s : 2117/2011 Author: Halima Louddi represented by Philippe Grant of the Swiss organization Track Impunity Always TRIAL Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 112 Country JUTBCCPR/C/112/D/2117/2011https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1920/en-US
Human Rights Council Concludes General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms, Holds General Debate on the Universal Periodic Review
The Human Rights Council this morning concluded its general debate on human rights bodies and mechanisms and held a general debate on the Universal Periodic Review. Among the issues raised by speakers in the continuing general debate on human rights UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/press-releases/2022/09/human-rights-council-concludes-general-debate-human-rights-bodies-and
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Saudi Arabia, Senegal, the Congo and Nigeria
Human Rights CouncilMORNING 14 March 2019 The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Saudi Arabia Senegal the Congo and Nigeria. At the beginning of the meeting Harald Aspelund Vice President of the Human UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/news/2019/03/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review-outcomes-saudi-arabia-senegal
Human Rights Council adopts Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Sweden, Grenada, Turkey and Kiribati
29 September 2020 Begins General Debate on Human Rights Bodies and Mechanisms The Human Rights Council this morning adopted the Universal Periodic Review outcomes of Sweden Grenada Turkey and Kiribati. It also started the general debate on human rights UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/general-comments-and-recommendations/2020/09/human-rights-council-adopts-universal-periodic-review
Human Rights Council adopts outcome of Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina
Human Rights Council AFTERNOON 11 June 2010 Holds General Debate on Universal Periodic Review Mechanism The Human Rights Council this afternoon adopted the outcome of the Universal Periodic Review of Bosnia and Herzegovina following which it held a UPRhttps://www.ohchr.org//en/2010/06/human-rights-council-adopts-outcome-universal-periodic-review-bosnia-and-herzegovina