Search
Data source
EU member states
Other countries
Keywords
Tags
Displaying 821 - 840 of 2132
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium
MUGEMANGANGO v. Belgium BEL 10/07/2020 00:00:00 29/07/2020 17:07:09 Case Description: The Mugemangango case concerns the absence of a procedure offering adequate and sufficient safeguards to prevent arbitrariness and to ensure effective examination of the EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-55685
MUTISHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria
MUTISHEV AND OTHERS v. Bulgaria BGR 03/03/2010 00:00:00 27/10/2016 15:19:52 Case Description: The cases in the Lyubomir Popov the Sivova and Koleva and the Mutishev and Others groups concern unjustified delays in complying with judgments and EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-3845
Mahmud Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan
Mahmud Hudaybergenov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/115/D/2221/2012 Communication number s : 2221/2012 Author: Mahmud Hudaybergenov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 115 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 29 Oct 2015 JUTBCCPR/C/115/D/2221/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2062/en-US
Maille v. France
Maille v. France CCPR/C/69/D/689/1996 Communication number s : 689/1996 Author: Richard Maille Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 69 Country France Submission date 17 Nov 1995 Date of decision 10 Jul 2000 Comment: Pursuant to rule 85 of the JUTBCCPR/C/69/D/689/1996https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/886/en-US
Maksudov, Rakhimov, Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan,Uzbekistan
Maksudov Rakhimov Tashbaev and Pirmatov v. Kyrgyzstan Uzbekistan CCPR/C/93/D/1461 1462 1476 1477/2006 Communication number s : 1476/2006 1462/2006 1477/2006 1461/2006 Author: Zhakhongir Maksudov and Adil Rakhimov Yakub Tashbaev and Rasuldzhon Pirmatov JUTBCCPR/C/93/D/1461,1462,1476&1477/2006https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1445/en-US
Malika Bendjael et al. v. Algeria
Malika Bendjael et al. v. Algeria CCPR/C/128/D/2893/2016 Communication number s : 2893/2016 Author: Malika Bendjael and Merouane Bendjael Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 128 Country Algeria Submission date 08 Apr 2016 Date of decision 27 JUTBCCPR/C/128/D/2893/2016https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2870/en-US
Matkarim Aminov v. Turkmenistan
Matkarim Aminov v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2220/2012 Communication number s : 2220/2012 Author: Matkarim Aminov Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan Submission date 03 Sep 2012 Date of decision 14 Jul 2016 Comment: JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2220/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2182/en-US
Medina Vela v. Mexico
Medina Vela v. Mexico CRPD/C/22/D/32/2015 Communication number s : 32/2015 Author: Arturo Medina Vela Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 22 Country Mexico Submission date 19 Aug 2015 Date of decision 06 Sep 2019 Comment: This document has no JUTBCRPD/C/22/D/32/2015https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3133/en-US
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan
Mursalov et al v. Azerbaijan CCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018 Communication number s : 3153/2018 Author: Rovshan Mursalov Fatima Balova Milena Makarenko Basti Rasulova Galina Fazliahmadova and Goderdzi Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 136 Country JUTBCCPR/C/136/D/3153/2018https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3681/en-US
N.A.E. v. Spain
N.A.E. v. Spain CEDAW/C/82/D/149/2019 Communication number s : 149/2019 Author: N.A.E. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 82 Country Spain Submission date 10 Nov 2018 Date of decision 27 Jun 2022 Comment: This document has no comment: JUTBCEDAW/C/82/D/149/2019https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/3144/en-US
N.M. v. Switzerland
N.M. v. Switzerland CAT/C/24/D/116/1998 Communication number s : 116/1998 Author: N.M. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 24 Country Switzerland Submission date 10 Jul 1998 Date of decision 09 May 2000 Comment: Under rule 108 paragraph 9 of JUTBCAT/C/24/D/116/1998https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/214/en-US
N.T.W. v. Switzerland
N.T.W. v. Switzerland CAT/C/48/D/414/2010 Communication number s : 414/2010 Author: N.T.W. Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 48 Country Switzerland Submission date 18 Mar 2010 Date of decision 16 May 2012 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/48/D/414/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/34/en-US
NETHERLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NETHERLANDS: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/NLD/CO/5 6 NULL 2022 03 09T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/NLD/CO/5 6 Convention on the Distr.: General 9 March 2022 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/NLD/CO/5-6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/980fbefe-2631-4c69-81ce-d3fc0b9ab6d4
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS
NEW ZEALAND: CONCLUDING OBSERVATIONS CRC/C/NZL/CO/6 NULL 2023 02 10T00:00:00 CRC United Nations CRC/C/NZL/CO/6 Convention on the Distr.: General 28 February 2023 Rights of the Child Original: English Committee on the Rights of the Child Concluding UHRICRC/C/NZL/CO/6https://uhri.ohchr.org/en/document/3a39ddd8-7288-41fa-9328-3570a7cee29b
National report submitted in accordance with paragraph 5 of the annex to Human Rights Council resolution 16/21 - Egypt
United Nations A/HRC/WG.6/34/EGY/1 General Assembly Distr.: General 21 August 2019 English Original: Arabic Human Rights Council Working Group on the Universal Periodic Review Thirty fourth session 4 15 November 2019 National report submitted in UPRA/HRC/WG.6/34/EGY/1https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/country-reports/national-report-submitted-accordance-paragraph-5-annex-human-rights
Navruz Tahirovich Nasyrlayev v. Turkmenistan
Navruz Tahirovich Nasyrlayev v. Turkmenistan CCPR/C/117/D/2219/2012 Communication number s : 2219/2012 Author: Navruz Tahirovich Nasyrlayev represented by counsel Shane H. Brady Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 117 Country Turkmenistan JUTBCCPR/C/117/D/2219/2012https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/2170/en-US
Nirmal Singh v. Canada
Nirmal Singh v. Canada CAT/C/46/D/319/2007 Communication number s : 319/2007 Author: Nirmal Singh Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 46 Country Canada Submission date 20 Jun 2007 Date of decision 30 May 2011 Comment: This document has no JUTBCAT/C/46/D/319/2007https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/60/en-US
Nyusti and Takács v. Hungary
Nyusti and Tak cs v. Hungary CRPD/C/9/D/1/2010 Communication number s : 001/2010 Author: Szilvia Nyusti and P ter Tak cs Type of decision: Decision on merits Session No 9 Country Hungary Submission date 11 Mar 2010 Date of decision 16 Apr 2013 Comment: JUTBCRPD/C/9/D/1/2010https://juris.ohchr.org/casedetails/1986/en-US
OPUZ v. Turkey
OPUZ v. Turkey TUR 09/09/2009 00:00:00 10/11/2016 15:53:30 Case Description: This group of cases concerns the failure of the authorities to protect women the applicants or their female relatives from domestic violence despite having been reasonably EXEChttps://hudoc.exec.coe.int/eng?i=004-37222
Operations of the Voluntary Fund for Financial and Technical Assistance in the Implementation of the Universal Periodic Review - Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights
United Nations A/HRC/38/27 General Assembly Distr.: General 26 April 2018 Original: English Human Rights Council Thirty eighth session 18 June 6 July 2018 Agenda items 2 and 6 Annual report of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights and UPRA/HRC/38/27https://www.ohchr.org//en/documents/reports/operations-voluntary-fund-financial-and-technical-assistance-implementation-1